Abstract
The year 2006 marked the bicentenary of two seminal events in German and French history: the dissolution of the old Reich or Holy Roman Empire that had encompassed much of Europe for over a millennium, and its replacement by a new, French-sponsored political order. The juxtaposition of the two empires in 1806 offers an ideal opportunity for a comparative approach to the transition towards modernity and serves as a snapshot moment in the vacillating balance of power and influence between France and Germany in the construction of Europe. The rapidity of these changes suggests a major turning point, to some even the birth of modernity itself, as Napoleon, the inheritor of the dynamic, rationalising traditions of the French Revolution, triumphed over a socio-political order that had its roots in the early middle ages and claimed direct descent from the ancient Roman Empire. However, recent research on both countries suggests that the contrast is considerably more complex than is commonly assumed. To date this research has been conducted largely in parallel and remains dominated by the concerns of two distinct national historiographies. The anniversary of 1806 is an ideal moment to draw these lines of investigation together.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
T.A. Brady, ‘Princes’ Reformation versus Urban Liberty. Strasbourg and the Restoration in Württemberg 1534’, in I. Batori (ed.), Städtische Gesellschaft und Reformation (Stuttgart, 1980), pp. 265–91.
S.S. Biro, The German Policy of Revolutionary France. A Study in French Diplomacy during the War of the First Coalition (2 vols., Cambridge, Mass., 1957);
T.C.W. Blanning, The French Revolutionary Wars, 1787–1802 (London, 1996).
P.H. Wilson, German Armies: War and German Politics 1648–1806 (London, 1998), esp. pp. 280–97.
Excellent overview in H.M. Scott, The Birth of a Great Power System 1740–1815 (Harlow, 2006), pp. 185–213.
Further detail in M. Hochedlinger, ‘Who’s Afraid of the French Revolution? Austrian Foreign Policy and the European Crisis 1787–1797’, German History, 21 (2003), 293–318;
J. Lukowski, The Partitions of Poland. 1772, 1793, 1795 (Harlow, 1999).
The eastern dimension is especially stressed by T.C.W. Blanning, The Origins of the French Revolutionary Wars (London, 1986).
D.M. Luebke, ‘Serfdom and Honour in Eighteenth-Century Germany’, Social History, 18 (1993), 141–61.
For example, by exchanging enclaves with the elector of Trier after 1763: B.J. Kreuzberg, Die politischen und wirtschaftlichen Beziehungen des Kurstaates Trier zu Frankreich in der zweiten Hälfte des 18. Jahrhunderts bis zum ausbruch der Französischen Revolution (Bonn, 1932).
J. Smets, ‘Von der “Dorfidylle” zur preußischen Nation’, Historische Zeitschrift, 262 (1996), pp. 695–738 at 696.
H. Berding (ed.), Soziale Unruhen in Deutschland während der französischen Revolution (Göttingen, 1988).
For a critique of the relationship of the Peace to state sovereignty, see D. Croxton, ‘The Peace of Westphalia of 1648 and the Origins of Sovereignty’, International History Review, 21 (1999), 569–91.
The former claim is made by G. Schmidt, Geschichte des alten Reiches. Staat und Nation in der Frühen Neuzeit 1495–1806 (Munich, 1999);
P.C. Hartmann, Kulturgeschichte des Heiligen Römischen Reiches 1648 bis 1806 (Vienna, 2001).
This aspect is discussed further in P.H. Wilson, ‘Still a Monstrosity? Some Reflections on Early Modern German Statehood’, The Historical Journal, 49 (2006), 565–76.
The literature on the courts is now extensive, but the following provide good guides: W. Sellert (ed.), Reichshofrat und Reichskammergericht (Cologne, 1999);
R. Sailer, Untertanprozesse vor dem Reichskammergericht (Cologne, 1999).
For the partial revival of the Reichskammergericht at the end of the eighteenth century, see K.O. Frhr. v. Aretin, ‘Kaiser Joseph II und die Reichskammergerichtvisitation 1766–1776’, Zeitschrift für Neuere Rechtsgeschichte, 13 (1991), 129–44.
K. Härter, Reichstag und Revolution 1789–1806 (Göttingen, 1992).
See the contributions to C.D. Storrs (ed.), The Fiscal-Military State in Eighteenth-Century Europe (Aldershot, 2008).
T.C.W. Blanning, The French Revolution in Germany: Occupation and Resistance in the Rhineland, 1792–1802 (Oxford, 1983);
M. Rowe, From Reich to State. The Rhineland in the Revolutionary Age, 1780–1830 (Cambridge, 2003). See also David Hopkin’s Chapter 11 in this volume.
M. Hochedlinger, Austria’s Wars of Emergence 1683–1797 (Harlow, 2003), pp. 401–42;
P.H. Wilson, ‘German Military Preparedness on the Eve of the Revolutionary Wars’, in F.C. Schneid (ed.), Warfare in Europe 1792–1815 (Aldershot, 2007), pp. 415–30.
See W. Burgdorf, Reichskonstitution und Nation. Verfassungsrefromprojekte für das Heilige Römische Reich deutscher Nation im politischen Schriftum von 1648 bis 1806 (Mainz, 1998).
Further coverage of the public debates can be found in J.G. Gagliardo, Reich and Nation: the Holy Roman Empire as Idea and Reality, 1763–1806 (Bloomington, 1980).
For the national question, see M. Hughes, Nationalism and Society. Germany 1800–1945 (London, 1988); J. Breuilly’s Chapter 13 in this volume.
P.H. Wilson, ‘Bolstering the Prestige of the Habsburgs: the End of the Holy Roman Empire in 1806’, International History Review, 28 (2006), 709–36.
A. Fahrmeier, ‘Centralism versus Particularism in the “Third Germany”’, in M. Rowe (ed.), Collaboration and Resistance in Napoleonic Europe (Basingstoke, 2003), pp. 107–20;
T.C.W. Blanning, The Culture of Power and the Power of Culture: Old Regime Europe 1660–1789 (Oxford, 2002).
J.Q. Whitman, The Legacy of Roman Law in the German Romantic Era (Princeton, 1990).
See for example, M. Umbach, Federalism and Enlightenment in Germany 1740– 1806 (London, 2000).
In addition to the works cited in n. 12 above, see also M. Hughes, ‘Fiat justitia, pereat Germania? The Imperial Supreme Jurisdiction and Imperial Reform in the later Holy Roman Empire’, in J. Breuilly (ed.), The State in Germany (Harlow, 1992), pp. 29–46.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2009 Alan Forrest and Peter H. Wilson
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Forrest, A., Wilson, P.H. (2009). Introduction. In: Forrest, A., Wilson, P.H. (eds) The Bee and the Eagle. War, Culture and Society, 1750–1850. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230236738_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230236738_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-28437-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-23673-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)