Abstract
The previous chapter has opened a quest for a new paradigm, or even possibly for a new ontology. If we would like to understand the world differently, we might need a new set of basic assumptions, beliefs that we hold about how nature itself functions. It is generally accepted that the world functions according to the laws of Nature given to us by Newton. We would operate in a fixed time-space concept. Events are causally related, and if we know what happens today, we know with certitude what happened yesterday and what is happening tomorrow. Clearly, however, our relationship with the past is a much easier one than our relationship with the future. We know exactly what happened yesterday; we have no clue what is going to happen tomorrow. In reality, in practice, a Newtonian world does not seem to hold. Nevertheless, our managerial thinking is still heavily based on causal thinking. We claim that we can only manage causalities. But in reality again, what a manager, a leader, deals with is interconnectedness of people, and that seems to follow its own pattern of logic.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography and further readings
Arthur, B. (1998) ‘The end of certainty in economies’, in D. Aerts, J. Broekaert, and E. Mathijs (eds), Einstein meets Margritte, Kluwer Academic.
Baets, W. (2005) Knowledge Management and Management Learning: Extending the Horizons of Knowledge-Based Management, Springer.
Baets, W. (2006a) Complexity, Learning and Organisations: A Quantum Interpretation of Business, Routledge.
Baets, W. (2006b) ‘Complexity theory: dynamics and non-linearity are the only reason for knowledge management to exist’, in I. Boughzala and J-L. Ermine (eds) (2006) Trends in applied knowledge management, Edition Henries Penton Science.
Bogdanov, I. and Bogdanov, G. (2004) Avant le Big Bang, Editions Grasset & Fasquelle.
Caro, M. and Murphy, J. (eds) (2002) The World of Quantum Culture, Greenwood Press.
Chopra, D. (1990) Quantum Healing: Exploring the Frontiers of Mind Body Medicine, Bantam Books.
Clauser, J. E and Shimony, A. (1978) ‘Bell’s Theorem: Experimental Tests and Implications’, in Reports on Progress in Physics, 41.
Cushing, J. (1998) Philosophical concepts in physics, Cambridge University Press.
Dalla Chiara, M. L. and Giuntini, R. (1999) ‘Quantum Logical Semantics, Historical Truths and Interpretations in Art’, in D. Aerts and J. Pykacz J. (eds) (1999) Quantum structures and the nature of reality, Kluwer Academic.
De Meijgaard, H. (2002) Wolfgang Pauli Centennial 1900–2000, PhD Thesis TU Twente.
Dirac, P. (1958) The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 4th edn, Oxford University Press.
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., and Rosen, N. (1935) ‘Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?’, in Physical Review, 47, reprinted in J. A. Wheeler and W. D. Zurek (eds), Quantum Theory and Measurement, Princeton University Press.
Heisenberg, W. (1927) ‘Uber den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik’, Zeitschrift für Physik, 43. In English translation: Wheeler J. A. and Zurek W. D. (eds) (1983) ‘The Physical Content of Quantum Kinematics and Mechanistics’, in J. A. Wheeler and W. D. Zurek (eds), Quantum Theory and Measurement, Princeton University Press.
Klein, M. J. (1964) ‘Einstein and the Wave-Particle Duality’, in D. E. Geherson and D. A. Greensberg (eds), The Natural Philosopher.
Mitchell, E. and Williams, D. (1996) The Way of the Explorer: An Apollo Astronaut’s Journey Through the Material and Mystical World, Putman’s Sons.
Pauli, G. and Jung, H. (1955), The Interpretation of Nature and Psyche, translated from German, Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Polkinghorne, J. (1990) The Quantum World, Penguin.
Schrödinger, E. (1935) ‘Die Gegenwartige Situation in der Quantummechanik’, Die Naturwissenschaften, 23. English translation by Wheeler J. A. and Zurek W. D. (eds) (1983) ‘The Present Situation in Quantum Mechanics’, Quantum Theory and Measurement, Princeton University Press.
Sheldrake, R. (1995) The Presence of the Past, Park Street Press.
Sheldrake, R. and Bohm, D. (1982) ‘Morphogenetic fields and the implicate order’, ReVision, 5: 41–8.
Varela, R (1979) Principles of Biological Autonomy, Elsevier-North Holland.
Wilber, K. (2000) A Brief History of Everything, Gateway.
Copyright information
© 2009 Walter Baets and Erna Oldenboom
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Baets, W., Oldenboom, E. (2009). Emergence and Dynamics: A Quantum Ontology of A-causality. In: Rethinking Growth. The Diversity, Leadership and Responsibility Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230235793_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230235793_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-29952-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-23579-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)