Abstract
Proposals for the twentieth century to be understood as the century of traumatic witness have dominated post-millennial criticism and analysis in multiple genres of life-writing and history.2 For the media, the claim has been made directly that ‘television sealed the twentieth century’s fate as the century of witness’ (Ellis, 2000, p. 32). It would seem, then, that trauma and its attendance in witnesses and testimonies are central to understanding the century gone and the one recently begun. The sciences sit peculiarly on the edge of this claim. On the one hand, scientific witnessing suggests a remove from the witness to trauma; ‘the objective witness is very different from the survivor … the objective witness claims disembodiment and passivity, a cold indifference to the story, offering “just the facts”’ (Peters, 2001, p. 716). On the other hand, scientists may claim objectivity and disinterestedness in the way they go about research, but they certainly are not disinterested in the results, the ‘story’, or the interpretations of their data. Further, the goals of science do not include only representation, but intervention, belying the passivity in the appeal to objective witness; the point of science is both to represent the world and do things in it (Hacking, 1983; Pickering, 1995). Finally, through tracing the history of the position of scientific witness, historians of science have drawn attention to the mediated nature of scientific observation and the moral, political, and epistemic commitments of scientific observers as they invent (in the rhetorical sense of inventio) testimony from observation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
J. Adler (1994) ‘Testimony, Trust, and Knowing’, Journal of Philosophy, vol. 91, 264–75.
Aristotle, ‘The Art of Rhetoric’, in Jonathan Barnes (ed.), The Complete Works of Aristotle, 2 vols (Princeton: Princeton University Press; publication date: 1984).
C. Barron (2003) ‘A Strong Distinction between Humans and Non-Humans is No Longer Required for Research Purposes’, History of the Human Sciences, vol. 16, no. 2, 77–9.
C.A.J. Coady (2002) ‘Testimony and Intellectual Autonomy’, Studies In History and Philosophy of Science Part A, vol. 33, no. 2, 355–72.
V. Das, A. Kleinman, M. Lock, M. Ramphele, and P. Reynolds (eds) (2001) Remaking a World: Violence, Social Suffering and Recovery (London: University of California Press).
J. Durant (1989) ‘The Public Understanding of Science’, Nature, vol. 340, 11–4.
J. Ellis (2000) Seeing Things: Television in the Age of Uncertainty (London: I. B. Tauris).
S. Felman and D. Laub (1992) Testimony: Crises of Witnessing in Literature, Psychoanalysis, and History (New York: Routledge).
S. Fuller (1996) ‘Recent Work in Social Epistemology’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 3, 149–66.
L. Gilmore (2001) The Limits of Autobiography: Trauma and Testimony (London: Cornell University Press).
I. Hacking (1983) Representing and Intervening (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
D. Haraway (1985) ‘A Manifesto for Cyborgs’, Socialist Review, vol. 80, 65–88.
D. Haraway (1996) Modest Witness@Second Millennium: Femaleman Meets Oncomouse (New York: Routledge).
J. Hardwig (1985) ‘Epistemic Dependence’, The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 82, 335–49.
J.E. Harmon and A. Gross (2007) The Scientific Literature: A Guided Tour (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
L. Hunter (1999) Critiques of Knowing: Situated Textualities in Science, Computing and the Arts (London: Routledge).
E. Hutchins (1995) Cognition in the Wild (Cambridge: MIT Press).
M. Kusch and P. Lipton (2002) ‘Testimony: A Primer’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 33, 209–17.
D. Laub and S. Feldman (1991) Testimony: Crises of Witnessing in Literature, Psychoanalyis and History (New York: Routledge).
P. Lipton (1998) ‘The Epistemology of Testimony’, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 29, no. 1, 1–33.
J. Metcalfe and T. Gascoigne (1997) ‘Incentives and Impediments to Scientists Communicating through the Media’, Science Communication, vol. 18, no. 3, 265–82.
M. Mead and R. Metraux (1957) ‘The Image of the Scientist among High-School Students’, Science, vol. 126, no. 3270, 384–90.
S. Montgomery (1995) The Scientific Voice (London: Guilford Press).
A. Pickering (1995) The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency and Science (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
J.D. Peters (2001) ‘Witnessing’, Media, Culture and Society, vol. 23, no. 6, 707–23. Also in this volume, Chapter 1.
V. Postrel (2007) ‘Beautiful Minds’, The Atlantic, vol. 300, no. 2, 140–1.
K. Rolin (2002) ‘Gender and Trust in Science’, Hypatia, vol. 17, no. 4, 95–118.
S. Shapin (1984) ‘Pump and Circumstance: Robert Boyle’s Literary Technology’, Social Studies of Science, vol. 14, 481–520.
S. Shapin (1994) A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth Century England (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
B. Shapiro (2002) ‘Testimony in Seventeenth-Century English Natural Philosophy: Legal Origins and Early Development’, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 33, 243–63.
L. Suchman (2007) Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions, 2nd edn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
D. Wilson and D. Sperber (1981) ‘On Grice’s Theory of Conversation’, in P. Wersh (ed.), Conversation and Discourse (New York: St. Martin’s Press).
J. Ziman (2000) Real Science: What It Is and What It means (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2009 Joan Leach
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Leach, J. (2009). Scientific Witness, Testimony, and Mediation. In: Frosh, P., Pinchevski, A. (eds) Media Witnessing. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230235762_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230235762_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-36236-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-23576-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)