Abstract
The German sociologist Beck argues that a new frame of reference is needed to understand the world in which we have entered: that of a risk society on the global setting (Beck 1992, 1999). The alarming trend of environmental degradation, as well as the multiple advances of technological progress, bring about unprecedented risks and challenges; we thus need to learn how to address these new problems posed to our socioeconomic system and to our culture, for instance by climate change and the mounting threats on ecosystems, or by the development of genetics or nanotechnologies. The advent of this “world risk society” with all its consequences provides new opportunities for insurance companies, which can find in this evolution new fields to apply their expertise, and strong motivations to develop innovative policies and practices that will contribute to restore the industry’s tarnished reputation. This chapter will strive to answer three questions: why is the image of this industry so bad today? What are the corporate responsibility (CR) policies adopted by a group of pioneering companies? And is there a clear relationship between these two facts?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allianz Group (2005) Status Report 2005, Sustainability in the Allianz Group.
Allianz Group (2006) Status Report 2006, Sustainability in the Allianz Group.
Armstrong, K. et al. (2003) “Life Insurance and Breast Cancer Risk Assessment: Adverse Selection, Genetic Testing Decisions, and Discrimination,” American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 120A/3: 359–64.
Association of British Insurers (2005) Concordat and Moratorium on Genetics and Insurance.
Avila, S. and Borna, S. (1999) “Genetic Information: Consumers’ Right to Privacy versus Insurance Companies’ Right to Know a Public Opinion Survey,” Journal of Business Ethics, 19/4:355–62.
Aviva (2005) Corporate Social Responsibility Report 2005.
Aviva (2006) Corporate Social Responsibility Report 2006.
AXA (2006) 2005 Activity and Sustainable Development Report.
Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Sage Publications.
Beck, U. (1999) World Risk Society. Polity Press.
Belth, J. and Dorfman, J. (1996) “Insurance Companies Should Divest their Tobacco Investments,” Business and Society Review, 97: 26–31.
Carroll, J. (2001) “Most Americans Oppose Giving Genetic Information to Health Insurers and Employers,” Gallup News Service, July 11, http://www.gallup.com
Charles River Associates (2005) Study of Intermediary Remuneration. A Report for the Association of British Insurers. London.
Clements-Hunt, P. (2004) “The Challenge of Sustainability for Financial Institutions,” in Seiler-Hausmann, J.-D. et al. (eds), Eco-Efficiency and Beyond. Towards the Sustainable Enterprise, Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield, UK, pp. 182–95.
Cooper, R. and Frank, G. (2001) “Key Ethical Issues Facing the Property and Casualty Insurance Industry: Has a Decade Made a Difference?” CPCU Journal, 54/2:99–111.
Cooper, R. and Frank, G. (2006) “The Property and Casualty Insurance Industry’s Ethical Environment: an Update,” CPCU ejournal, 59/3: 1–12.
Cooper, R., Frank, G. and Williams, A. (2003) “The Life Insurance Industry’s Ethical Environment: Has it Improved in the New Millennium?” Journal of Financial Service Professionals, 57/6: 38–50.
Cupach, W. and Carson, J. (2002) “The Influence of Compensation on Product Recommendations Made by Insurance Agents,” Journal of Business Ethics, 40/2: 167–76.
De Bettignies, H.-C. and Lépineux, F. (forthcoming) “Can Multinational Corporations Afford to Ignore the Global Common Good?” Business and Society Review.
Diacon, S. and Ennew, C. (1996) “Ethical Issues in Insurance Marketing in the UK,” European Journal of Marketing, 30/5: 67–80.
Financial Ombudsman Service (2005) Annual Review and Report and Financial Statements: April 2004 to March 2005.
Financial Services Authority (2005) Mortgage Endowments: Shortfalls and Consumer Action.
Gallup (2003) “Public Rates Nursing as Most Honest and Ethical Profession,” Gallup News Service, December 1, http://www.gallup.com
Global Compact (2004) Who Cares Wins: Connecting Financial Markets to a Changing World. United Nations Global Compact Office, New York.
House of Commons Treasury Committee (2004) Restoring Confidence in Long-Term Savings: Endowment Mortgages. Fifth report of session 2003–2004.
Howe, V., Hoffman, D. and Hardigree, D. (1994) “The Relationship between Ethical and Customer-Oriented Service Provider Behaviors,” Journal of Business Ethics, 13/7:497–506.
Human Genetics Commission (2001) Public Attitudes to Human Genetic Information.
ING Group (2005) Corporate Responsibility Report 2004.
ING Group (2006) Corporate Responsibility Report 2005.
Insurance Australia Group (2005) Sustainability Report 2005.
Insurance Australia Group (2006) Sustainability Report 2006.
Jones, M., Mothersbaugh, D. and Beatty, S. (2000) “Switching Barriers and Repurchase Intentions in Services,” Journal of Retailing, 76/2: 259–74.
Knoppers, B.M., Godard, B. and Joly, Y. (2004) “A Comparative International Overview,” in Rothstein, M. (ed.) Genetics and Life Insurance: Medical Underwriting and Social Policy, MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 173–94.
Kurland, N. (1995) “Ethics, Incentives, and Conflicts of Interest: a Practical Solution,” Journal of Business Ethics, 14/6: 465–75.
Lapham, V., Kozma, C. and Weiss, J. (1996) “Genetic Discrimination: Perspectives of Consumers,” Science, 214: 621–4.
Lloyds TSB (2006) Corporate Responsibility Report 2005.
Margolis, J. and Walsh, J. (2001) People and Profits? The Search for a Link between a Company’s Social and Financial Performance. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Synthesis Report.
Moore, D. (2001) “Firelighters Top Gallup’s ‘Honesty and Ethics’ List,” Gallup News Service, December 5, http://www.gallup.com
Penrose, G. (2004) Report of the Equitable Life Inquiry. House of Commons, The Stationery Office, London.
Saad, L. (2006) “Nurses Top List of Most Honest and Ethical Professions,” Gallup News Service, December 14, http://www.gallup.com
Schwepker Jr., C. and Good, D. (1999) “The Impact of Sales Quotas on Moral Judgment in the Financial Services Industry,” Journal of Services Marketing, 13/1: 38–58.
Sompo Japan Insurance (2005) Corporate Social Responsibility Report 2005.
State Farm Insurance (2006) 2005 Year in Review.
Steinbart, E. et al. (2001) “Impact of DNA Testing for Early-Onset Familial Alzheimer Disease and Front otemporal Dementia,” A rchives of Neurology, 58/11: 1828–31.
Swiss Reinsurance Company (2005) Sustainability Report 2004.
Swiss Reinsurance Company (2006) Sustainability Report 2005.
Tan, L. (2005) “Some ILPs Not Suitable for Older Folk: Guidebook,” The Straits Times, September 26, Singapore Press Holdings, Singapore.
UNEP Finance Initiative (2002) The UNEP Sustainable Energy Finance Initiative.
UNEP Finance Initiative (2004) The Materiality of Social, Environmental and Corporate Governance Issues to Equity Pricing.
United Nations Environment Program (2005) 2004 Annual Report, UNEP.
Weber, O. (2005) “Sustainability Benchmarking of European Banks and Financial Service Organizations,” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 12/2: 73–87.
Wingrove, K. et al. (1996) “Experiences and Attitudes Concerning Genetic Testing and Insurance in a Colorado Population: a Survey of Families Diagnosed with Fragile X Syndrome,” American Journal of Medical Genetics, 64/2: 378–81.
Zick, C. et al. (2000) “Genetic Testing, Adverse Selection, and the Demand for Life Insurance,” American Journal of Medical Genetics, 93/1: 29–39.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2009 Henri-Claude de Bettignies, François Lépineux and Cheon Kheong Tan
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
de Bettignies, HC., Lépineux, F., Tan, C.K. (2009). Insurers’ Corporate Responsibility Policies: a Response to the Industry’s Bad Image?. In: de Bettignies, HC., Lépineux, F. (eds) Finance for a Better World. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230235755_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230235755_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-36212-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-23575-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)