Skip to main content

Insurers’ Corporate Responsibility Policies: a Response to the Industry’s Bad Image?

  • Chapter
Finance for a Better World

Abstract

The German sociologist Beck argues that a new frame of reference is needed to understand the world in which we have entered: that of a risk society on the global setting (Beck 1992, 1999). The alarming trend of environmental degradation, as well as the multiple advances of technological progress, bring about unprecedented risks and challenges; we thus need to learn how to address these new problems posed to our socioeconomic system and to our culture, for instance by climate change and the mounting threats on ecosystems, or by the development of genetics or nanotechnologies. The advent of this “world risk society” with all its consequences provides new opportunities for insurance companies, which can find in this evolution new fields to apply their expertise, and strong motivations to develop innovative policies and practices that will contribute to restore the industry’s tarnished reputation. This chapter will strive to answer three questions: why is the image of this industry so bad today? What are the corporate responsibility (CR) policies adopted by a group of pioneering companies? And is there a clear relationship between these two facts?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allianz Group (2005) Status Report 2005, Sustainability in the Allianz Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allianz Group (2006) Status Report 2006, Sustainability in the Allianz Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, K. et al. (2003) “Life Insurance and Breast Cancer Risk Assessment: Adverse Selection, Genetic Testing Decisions, and Discrimination,” American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 120A/3: 359–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Association of British Insurers (2005) Concordat and Moratorium on Genetics and Insurance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avila, S. and Borna, S. (1999) “Genetic Information: Consumers’ Right to Privacy versus Insurance Companies’ Right to Know a Public Opinion Survey,” Journal of Business Ethics, 19/4:355–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aviva (2005) Corporate Social Responsibility Report 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aviva (2006) Corporate Social Responsibility Report 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • AXA (2006) 2005 Activity and Sustainable Development Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1999) World Risk Society. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belth, J. and Dorfman, J. (1996) “Insurance Companies Should Divest their Tobacco Investments,” Business and Society Review, 97: 26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. (2001) “Most Americans Oppose Giving Genetic Information to Health Insurers and Employers,” Gallup News Service, July 11, http://www.gallup.com

  • Charles River Associates (2005) Study of Intermediary Remuneration. A Report for the Association of British Insurers. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements-Hunt, P. (2004) “The Challenge of Sustainability for Financial Institutions,” in Seiler-Hausmann, J.-D. et al. (eds), Eco-Efficiency and Beyond. Towards the Sustainable Enterprise, Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield, UK, pp. 182–95.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. and Frank, G. (2001) “Key Ethical Issues Facing the Property and Casualty Insurance Industry: Has a Decade Made a Difference?” CPCU Journal, 54/2:99–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. and Frank, G. (2006) “The Property and Casualty Insurance Industry’s Ethical Environment: an Update,” CPCU ejournal, 59/3: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R., Frank, G. and Williams, A. (2003) “The Life Insurance Industry’s Ethical Environment: Has it Improved in the New Millennium?” Journal of Financial Service Professionals, 57/6: 38–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cupach, W. and Carson, J. (2002) “The Influence of Compensation on Product Recommendations Made by Insurance Agents,” Journal of Business Ethics, 40/2: 167–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Bettignies, H.-C. and Lépineux, F. (forthcoming) “Can Multinational Corporations Afford to Ignore the Global Common Good?” Business and Society Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diacon, S. and Ennew, C. (1996) “Ethical Issues in Insurance Marketing in the UK,” European Journal of Marketing, 30/5: 67–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Financial Ombudsman Service (2005) Annual Review and Report and Financial Statements: April 2004 to March 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Financial Services Authority (2005) Mortgage Endowments: Shortfalls and Consumer Action.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallup (2003) “Public Rates Nursing as Most Honest and Ethical Profession,” Gallup News Service, December 1, http://www.gallup.com

  • Global Compact (2004) Who Cares Wins: Connecting Financial Markets to a Changing World. United Nations Global Compact Office, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • House of Commons Treasury Committee (2004) Restoring Confidence in Long-Term Savings: Endowment Mortgages. Fifth report of session 2003–2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, V., Hoffman, D. and Hardigree, D. (1994) “The Relationship between Ethical and Customer-Oriented Service Provider Behaviors,” Journal of Business Ethics, 13/7:497–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Human Genetics Commission (2001) Public Attitudes to Human Genetic Information.

    Google Scholar 

  • ING Group (2005) Corporate Responsibility Report 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • ING Group (2006) Corporate Responsibility Report 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Insurance Australia Group (2005) Sustainability Report 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Insurance Australia Group (2006) Sustainability Report 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M., Mothersbaugh, D. and Beatty, S. (2000) “Switching Barriers and Repurchase Intentions in Services,” Journal of Retailing, 76/2: 259–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knoppers, B.M., Godard, B. and Joly, Y. (2004) “A Comparative International Overview,” in Rothstein, M. (ed.) Genetics and Life Insurance: Medical Underwriting and Social Policy, MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 173–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurland, N. (1995) “Ethics, Incentives, and Conflicts of Interest: a Practical Solution,” Journal of Business Ethics, 14/6: 465–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lapham, V., Kozma, C. and Weiss, J. (1996) “Genetic Discrimination: Perspectives of Consumers,” Science, 214: 621–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyds TSB (2006) Corporate Responsibility Report 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, J. and Walsh, J. (2001) People and Profits? The Search for a Link between a Company’s Social and Financial Performance. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Synthesis Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, D. (2001) “Firelighters Top Gallup’s ‘Honesty and Ethics’ List,” Gallup News Service, December 5, http://www.gallup.com

  • Penrose, G. (2004) Report of the Equitable Life Inquiry. House of Commons, The Stationery Office, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saad, L. (2006) “Nurses Top List of Most Honest and Ethical Professions,” Gallup News Service, December 14, http://www.gallup.com

  • Schwepker Jr., C. and Good, D. (1999) “The Impact of Sales Quotas on Moral Judgment in the Financial Services Industry,” Journal of Services Marketing, 13/1: 38–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sompo Japan Insurance (2005) Corporate Social Responsibility Report 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • State Farm Insurance (2006) 2005 Year in Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinbart, E. et al. (2001) “Impact of DNA Testing for Early-Onset Familial Alzheimer Disease and Front otemporal Dementia,” A rchives of Neurology, 58/11: 1828–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swiss Reinsurance Company (2005) Sustainability Report 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swiss Reinsurance Company (2006) Sustainability Report 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, L. (2005) “Some ILPs Not Suitable for Older Folk: Guidebook,” The Straits Times, September 26, Singapore Press Holdings, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP Finance Initiative (2002) The UNEP Sustainable Energy Finance Initiative.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP Finance Initiative (2004) The Materiality of Social, Environmental and Corporate Governance Issues to Equity Pricing.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Environment Program (2005) 2004 Annual Report, UNEP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, O. (2005) “Sustainability Benchmarking of European Banks and Financial Service Organizations,” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 12/2: 73–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wingrove, K. et al. (1996) “Experiences and Attitudes Concerning Genetic Testing and Insurance in a Colorado Population: a Survey of Families Diagnosed with Fragile X Syndrome,” American Journal of Medical Genetics, 64/2: 378–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zick, C. et al. (2000) “Genetic Testing, Adverse Selection, and the Demand for Life Insurance,” American Journal of Medical Genetics, 93/1: 29–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2009 Henri-Claude de Bettignies, François Lépineux and Cheon Kheong Tan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

de Bettignies, HC., Lépineux, F., Tan, C.K. (2009). Insurers’ Corporate Responsibility Policies: a Response to the Industry’s Bad Image?. In: de Bettignies, HC., Lépineux, F. (eds) Finance for a Better World. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230235755_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics