Socially Responsible Investment: Global Convergence or Local Divergence?

  • Céline Louche


The chapter conceptualizes the mechanisms that sustain the development of socially responsible investment (SRI). Empirical observations show that SRI has gained unprecedented momentum worldwide in recent years and has diffused on a global scale. The idea of SRI started several hundred years ago (Domini 2001). It was at that time a curiosity and a niche market phenomenon. No one would have ever expected SRI to grow beyond a marginal movement and cross national boundaries. Today, in 2008, SRI is embraced in most countries around the world — Europe, Asia, Latin America and Africa. The diffusion of SRI is characterized by the increase of SRI funds. Between 1995 and 2007, the number of SRI funds in the US has almost multiplied by five, from 55 to 260 (US SIF 2008) and by eight in Europe from 54 to 437 (SIRI Group 2002, 2007). Another feature of the development of SRI is the diversification of SRI-related products. SRI shifted from one single approach based on exclusion, also called “sin stocks,” to multiple approaches offering different strategies able to satisfy a variety of growing demands.


Corporate Social Responsibility Business Ethic Global Convergence Socially Responsible Investment Responsible Investment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Amable, B. (2003) The Diversity of Modern Capitalism. Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ambachtsheer, J. (2005) SRI: What Do Investment Managers Think? Mercer Investment Consulting, Belgium.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, D., Frost, G., Hogson, P. E., Minogue, K., O’Hear, A., and Scruton, R. (1996) What Has “Ethical Investment” to Do with Ethic? The Social Affairs Unit, London.Google Scholar
  4. Aspen Institute (2008) “Long-Term Value Creation: Guiding Principles for Corporations and Investors,”
  5. Bengtsson, E. (2007) “A History of Scandinavian Socially Responsible Investing,” Journal of Business Ethics, 16/3 (November): 155–68.Google Scholar
  6. Boxenbaum, E. and Gond, J.-P. (2006) Micro-Strategies of Contextualization: Cross-National Transfer of Socially Responsible Investment, DRUID Summer Conference 2006.Google Scholar
  7. Brunsson, N. and Olsen, J.P. (1998) “Organization Theory: Thirty Years of Dismantling and then?” in Brunsson, N. and Olsen, J.P. (eds) Organizing Organizations, Copenhagen Business School Press, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  8. Casper, S. and Hancké, B. (1999) “Global Quality Norms within National Production Regimes: ISO 9000 Standards in the French and German Car Industries,” Organization Studies, 20/6: 961–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chappel, W., Gond, J.-P. et al. (2008) The Influence of Institutional Varieties of Capitalism on Corporate Stakeholder Responsibility, Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Anaheim, Calif.Google Scholar
  10. Clark, G.L. and Hebb, T (2004) “Pension Fund Corporate Engagement,” Industrial Relations, 59/1: 142–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cowton, C. (1994) “The Development of Ethical Investment Products,” in Prindl, A.R. and and Prodhan, B. (eds) Ethical Conflicts in Finance, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  12. Cowton, C. (1998) “Socially Responsible Investment,” in Chadwick, R. (ed.) Encyclopaedia of Applied Ethics, Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
  13. CSR Europe, Deloitte and Euronext (2003) Investing in Responsible Business: the 2003 Survey of European Fund Managers, Financial. London.Google Scholar
  14. Czarniawska, B. and Joerges, B. (1998) “Winds of Organizational Change: How Ideas Translate into Objects and Actions,” in Brunsson, N. and Olsen, J.P. (eds) Organizing Organizations, Copenhagen Business School Press, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  15. Czarniawska, B. and Sevón, G. (eds) (1996) Translating Organizational Change. Walter de Gruyter, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Deloitte (2002) Socially Responsible Investment Survey 2002. London.Google Scholar
  17. DiMaggio, P.J. and Powell, W.W. (1983) “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Field,” American Sociological Review, 48/2: 147–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Domini, A.L. (2001) Socially Responsible Investing: Making a Difference in Making Money. Dearborn Trade, Chicago.Google Scholar
  19. European Commission (2001) Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility. Green Paper, European Commission, Brussels.Google Scholar
  20. Eurosil (2006) European SRI Study. Paris.Google Scholar
  21. Goldman Sachs (2007) “GS Sustain.” 200 7/gs_esg_embargoed_until030 70 7pdf.pdf.Google Scholar
  22. Gond, J.-P. and Boxenbaum, E. (2004) “Importing’ socially Responsible Investment’ in France and Quebec: Work of Contextualization across Varieties of Capitalism,” EGOS Conference, Ljubljana.Google Scholar
  23. Hall, P.A. and Gingerich, D.W. (2004) “Varieties of Capitalism and Institutional Complementarities in the Macroeconomy: an Empirical Analysis,” Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, MPIfG discussion paper 04/5.Google Scholar
  24. Hall, P.A. and Soskice, D. (2001) “An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism,” in Hall, P.A. and Soskice, D. (eds) Varieties of Capitalism: the Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 1–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jayne, M.R. and Skenatt, G. (2003) “Socially Responsible Investment in the UK — Criteria that are Used to Evaluate Suitability,” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 10/1: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kinder, P., Lydenberg, S.D. et al. (1994) Investing for Good, Making Money While Being Socially Responsible. Harper Business, New York.Google Scholar
  27. Latour, B. (1987) La science en action. Gallimard, Paris.Google Scholar
  28. Latour, B. (1996) Aramis, or the Love of Technology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  29. Louche, C. (2004) “Ethical Investment: Processes and Mechanisms of Institution-alisation in the Netherlands, 1990–2002.” PhD dissertation, Erasmus University Rotterdam. Optima Grafische Communicatie, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
  30. Louche, C. and Lydenberg, S. (2006) “Socially Responsible Investment: Difference between Europe and United States,” Working Paper, Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School.Google Scholar
  31. Louche, C, Markowtiz, L. et al. (forthcoming) “How Social Movements Generate New, Profit Driven Organizational Forms: Exploring Socially Responsible Investment Changes across Time and Space.”Google Scholar
  32. Matten, D. and Moon, J. (2008) “‘Implicit’’and ‘Explicit’ CSR: a Conceptual Framework for Comparative Understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility,” Academy of Management Review, 33/2.Google Scholar
  33. Meyer, J.W. (2000) “Globalization: Sources and Effects on National States and Societies,” International Sociology, 15/2: 233–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Meyer, J.W., Boli, J., Thomas, G.M., and Ramirez, F.O. (1997) “World Society and the Nation-State,” American Journal of Sociology, 103/1: 144–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Meyer, J.W. and Rowan, B. (1977) “The Effects of Education as an Institution,” American Journal of Sociology, 87: 53–77.Google Scholar
  36. Olson, N.R., Ventresca, M.J. et al. (2003) “How Institutions Emerge: Mechanisms in the Origins and Elaboration of Emerging Environmental Management Codes Field,” Working Paper, School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  37. Robertson, R. (1995) “Globalisation: Time-Space and Homogeneity-Heterogeneity,” in Featherstone, M., Lash, S. and Robertson, R. (eds) Global Modernities, Sage Publications, London.Google Scholar
  38. Roome, N. J. (2006) “Competitiveness, Corporate Responsibility and Innovation.” Presentation to the EU Conference on Competitiveness, Corporate Responsibility and Innovation under the Finnish Presidency, Brussels.Google Scholar
  39. Sakuma, K. and Louche, C. (2008) “Socially Responsible Investment in Japan: Its Mechanism and Drivers,” Journal of Business Ethics, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  40. Schmidt, V. (2002) The Futures of European Capitalism. Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schueth, S. (2003) “Socially Responsible Investing in the United States,” Journal of Business Ethics, 43/3: 189–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Scott, W. R. (1994) “Conceptualizing Organisational Fields: Linking Organizations and Societal Systems,” in Derlien, H.-U. (ed.), Systemrationalitaet und Partialin-teresse: Festschrift für Renate Mayntz. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, Baden-Baden, Germany.Google Scholar
  43. Scott, W.R. (2001) Institutions and Organizations. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, Calif.Google Scholar
  44. SIRI Group (2002) Green, Social ana Ethical Funds in Europe 2002. SiRi Group/ Avanzi.Google Scholar
  45. SIRI Group (2007) Green, Social and Ethical Funds in Europe — 2007 Review. SiRi Group/Avanzi, Milan.Google Scholar
  46. Solomon, A., Solomon, J., and Suto, M. (2004) “Can the UK Experience Provide Lessons for the Evolution of SRI in Japan?” Corporate Governance: an International Review, 12/4: 552–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sparkes, R. (1995) The Ethical Investor. HarperCollins, London.Google Scholar
  48. Sparkes, R. (2001) “Ethical Investment: Whose Ethics, Which Investment?” Business Ethics: a European Review, 10/3: 194–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Star, S.L. and Griesemer, J.R. (1989) “Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’, and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–1939,” Social Studies of Science, 19:387–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Taylor Nelson Sofres (2003) Investing in Responsible Business — the 2003 Survey of European Fund Managers, Financial Analysts and Investor Relations Officers. CSR Europe, Deloitte, Euronext.Google Scholar
  51. Tempel, A. and Walgenbach, P. (2007) “Global Standardization of Organizational Forms and Management Practices? What New Institutionalism and the Business-Systems Approach Can Learn from Each Other,” Journal of Management Studies, 44/1: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tolbert, P.S. and Zucker, L.G. (1996) “The Institutionalisation of Institutional Theory,” in Handbook of Organisational Studies, Sage Publications, London.Google Scholar
  53. US SIF (2008) 2007 Report on Socially Responsible Investing Trends in US — Executive Summary. US Social Investment Forum, Washington.Google Scholar
  54. Whitley, R. (1997) “Business Systems,” in Sorge, A. (ed.) Organization, Thomson Learning, London, pp. 178–86.Google Scholar
  55. Whitley, R. (1998) “Internationalization and Varieties of Capitalism: the Limited Effect of Cross-National Coordination of Economic Activities on the Nature of the Business System,” Review of International Political Economy, 5: 445–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Whitley, R. (1999) Divergent Capitalisms: the Social Structuring of Change of Business Systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Céline Louche 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Céline Louche

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations