Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Human Needs and Political Judgment

  • Chapter
New Waves in Political Philosophy

Part of the book series: New Waves in Philosophy ((NWIP))

Abstract

In general, the best way to judge men is by their interests; and the best method of persuading them is to make them see their own interest in what you propose.

René-Louis de Voyer de Paulmy, marquis d’Argenson1

Judgment is central to politics and political theory. But it is also elusive. It requires and involves a wide range of skills, capacities, sentiments, values, and institutions. Some theorists respond to this elusive jumble of abilities, emotions, and forms of interaction by transcending them or abstracting from them. They resort to reason alone. This is particularly true of contemporary liberal political thought and its dependence on the odd coupling of “rights” and “preferences”.2 Rights, it is supposed, have a natural association with individual utility via the notion of subjective “preferences” (or avowed human wants): a properly instituted and enforced objective rights structure guarantees human life and liberty, and provides equal freedom for all with regard to their preferences and choices (Rawls 1996, pp. xli, xlviii). This is not only untrue (Geuss 2001, p. 148), but also detrimental to thinking about political judgment. In these terms a good political judgment becomes one that accords with a set of pre-determined, abstract rights. This jettisons understanding the various reasons or motivations for actions (rational or irrational) in favor of prescription: political judgment conceived in terms of maxims or principles for action, with rights acting as the universal criteria for judgment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Argenson, René Louis de Voyer d’ (1764) Considérations sur le gouvernement ancient et present de la France, Amsterdam: Marc Michel Rey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argenson, René Louis de Voyer d’ (1784) Considérations sur le gouvernement ancient et present de la France, 2nd ed, ed. the marquis de Paulmy, Amsterdam: Marc Michel Rey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle (2004) The Nicomachean Ethics, ed. J. A. K. Thomson, H. Tredennick & J. Barnes, London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle (1988) The Politics, ed. S. Everson, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle (1991) The Art of Rhetoric, London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, B. R. (1988) The Conquest of Politics: Liberal Philosophy in Democratic Times, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beiner, R. (1983) Political Judgment, London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braybrooke, D. (1987) Meeting Needs, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cicero (1997) Orator, trans. H. M. Hubbell, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicero (1999) On the Commonwealth and On the Laws, ed. J. E. G. Zetzel, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cicero (2001) De Oratore, trans. J. M. May and J. Wisse, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, W. E. (1983) The Terms of Political Discourse, Oxford: Martin Robertson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyal, L. and I. Gough (1991) A Theory of Human Need, London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J. (1980a) “Practising history and social science on “realist” assumptions,” in Political Obligation in its Historical Context: Essays in Political Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J. (1980b) “Political Obligations and Political Possibilities,” in Political Obligation in its Historical Context: Essays in Political Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J. (2005) Setting the People Free: The Story of Democracy, London: Atlantic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, R. (1977) Taking Rights Seriously, London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmerich, Z. (2006) “Toward a Needs-Based Conception of Intersubjectivity,” in the Symposium on Hamilton, The Political Philosophy of Needs, South African Journal of Philosophy, 25.3 (August), 249–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emmerich, Z. (2008) “Political Theory and the Realistic Spirit,” in Bell, D. (ed.), Political Thought and International Relations, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehér, F., Heller, A. and Markus, G. (1983) The Dictatorship Over Needs, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankfurt, H. (1998) “Necessity and Desire,” in G. Brock (ed.), Necessary Goods: Our Responsibilities to Meet Others’ Needs, Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 19–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garsten, B. (2006) Saving Persuasion: A Defense of Rhetoric and Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Geuss, R. (2001) History and Illusion in Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geuss, R. (2008) Philosophy and Real Politics, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, A., Madison, J. and Jay, J. (2003 [1787]) The Federalist, ed. T. Ball, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, L. (1999) “A Theory of True Interests in the Work of Amartya Sen,” Government and Opposition, 34. 4, 516–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, L. (2003) The Political Philosophy of Needs, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, L. (2006a) “The Context and Argument of The Political Philosophy of Needs’ and ‘Response to Critics’,” Symposium on my The Political Philosophy of Needs, in The South African Journal of Philosophy, 25. 3 (August), 224–32; 258–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, L. (2006b) “Human Needs, Land Reform and the South African Constitution,” Politikon, 33. 2, 133–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, L. (2008) “Needs and Agency,” in Jan Peil and Irene van Staveren (eds), Handbook of Economics and Ethics, Cheltenham, Glos: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, L. (2009a) “I’ve Never Met a Nice South African: Popular sovereignty, Citizenship and the South African Constitution,” in New Political Science, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, L. (2009b) “Human Needs and Economic Necessity,” Constellations (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardimon, M. (1994) Hegel’s Social Philosophy: The Project of Reconciliation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1969 [1812, 1816]) Hegel’s Science of Logic, trans. A. V. Miller. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1991 [1821]) Elements of the Philosophy of Right, ed. A. W. Wood trans. H. B. Nisbet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. (1991 [1651]) Leviathan, ed. R. Tuck, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hont, I. (2005) The Jealousy of Trade: International Competition and the Nation-State in Historical Perspective, Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humboldt, W. von (1967) Ideen zu einem Versuch, die Grenzen der Wirksamkeit des Staates zu bestimmen, Stuttgart: Reclam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (2000) Critique of the Power of Judgment, ed. P. Guyer, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1996) “On the Common Saying: That May Be Correct in Theory, But It Is of No Use in Practice,” in I. Kant (ed), Practical Philosophy, trans. Mary J. Gregor, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 273–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, N. O. (1980) Philosophy and the State in France: The Renaissance to the Enlightenment, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lear, J. (1988) Aristotle: The Desire to Understand, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lenin, V. I. (1969) What Is To Be Done?, New York: International Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenin, V. I. (1972) Materialism and Empirico-criticism, Peking: Foreign Languages Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J. (1988) Two Treatises of Government, ed. P. Laslett, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mandela, N. (1994). Long Walk to Freedom: The Autobiography of Nelson Mandela, London: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1847) “The Poverty of Philosophy,” in Karl Marx Frederick Engels Collected Works Vol. 6 (1976), London: Lawrence & Wishart, pp. 105–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1867) Capital, 3 vols, intro. E. Mandel, trans. D. Fernbach (1976–8), Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1890–1) “Critique of the Gotha Programme,” in T. Carver (ed.) (1996), Marx: Later Political Writings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 208–26.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1932) “Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts,” in Colletti (ed.) (1992), Karl Marx Early Writings, London: Penguin, pp. 279–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1939–41) Grundrisse, trans. M. Nicolaus (1973), Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. (1989) On Liberty, with the Subjection of Liberty and Essays on Socialism, ed. S. Collini, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R. (1974) Anarchy, State and Utopia, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (1996) “Aristotle on Emotions and Rational Persuasion,” in A. O Rorty, (ed.), Essays on Aristotle’s Rhetoric, Berkeley; London: University of California Press, pp. 303–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (1986) The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, M. (2007) Automobile Politics: Ecology and Cultural Political Economy Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato (2003) Republic, trans. D. Lee and H. D. P. Lee, Rev. ed., London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato (2004) Gorgias, trans. W. Hamilton and C. Emlyn-Jones, Rev. ed., London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proudhon, P.-J. (1994 [1840]) What is Property?, trans. and ed. D. R. Kelly and B. G. Smith, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raz, J. (1986) The Morality of Freedom, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1973) A Theory of Justice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1996) Political Liberalism, New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, A. O. (ed.) (1996) Essays on Aristotle’s Rhetoric, Berkeley; London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1993a) “Capability and Well-Being,” in M. C. Nussbaum and A. K. Sen (1993), The Quality of Life, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 30–53.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1993b) “Positional Objectivity,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 22, 126–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Q. (1996) Reason and Rhetoric in the Philosophy of Hobbes, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sonenscher, M. (2007) Before the Deluge: Public Debt, Inequality, and the Intellectual Origins of the French Revolution, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberger, P. J. (1993) The Concept of Political Judgment, Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Striker, G. (1996) “Emotions in Context: Aristotle’s Treatment of the Passions in the Rhetoric and His Moral Psychology,” in A. O. Rorty, (ed.), Essays on Aristotle’s Rhetoric, Berkeley; London: University of California Press, pp. 286–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, G. (1987) Needs, London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuck, R. (1997) “The Dangers of Natural Rights,” in Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 20. 3, 683–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickers, B. (1989) In Defence of Rhetoric, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1994 [1919]) “The Profession and Vocation of Politics,” in P. Lassman and R. Spiers (eds), Weber: Political Writings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 309–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, D. (1998a) “Claims of Need,” in Needs, Values, Truth, Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, D. (1998b) “Deliberation and Practical Reason,” in Needs, Values, Truth, Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. (1981) Moral Luck, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1997) Philosophical Investigations, trans. G. E. M. Anscombe, 2nd ed, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolin, S. (2004) Politics and Vision (Expanded Edition), Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Lawrence Hamilton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Groningen, The Netherlands

    Boudewijn de Bruin (Assistant Professor of philosophy) (Assistant Professor of philosophy)

  2. University of Kentucky, USA

    Christopher F. Zurn (Associate Professor of philosophy) (Associate Professor of philosophy)

Copyright information

© 2009 Lawrence Hamilton

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hamilton, L. (2009). Human Needs and Political Judgment. In: de Bruin, B., Zurn, C.F. (eds) New Waves in Political Philosophy. New Waves in Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230234994_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation