Skip to main content

Conclusion: the Age of Formula Fiction

  • Chapter
A Counter-History of Crime Fiction

Part of the book series: Crime Files Series ((CF))

  • 276 Accesses

Abstract

In my attempt to write a counter-history of crime fiction I have touched on a variety of sub-genres, including the ghost story, adventures of psychic detection, sensation fiction, the ‘literature’ of London and anarchist fiction, so as to shed light on the variety of discourses that intertwined in nineteenth-century ‘criminography’. To conclude my survey, I need to focus on the important changes that took place within crime fiction itself at the turn of the century, for it was these changes that set the ground for the formation of a detective canon. Thus I will first consider the relevance that the Sherlock Holmes saga acquired as a complex cultural phenomenon and the ideological framework underlying the Father Brown stories. Then I will briefly sketch the early development of the new subgenre of spy fiction, and finally I will go on to explain why the burgeoning comprehensive tradition of crime criticism discussed in Chapter 1 was progressively marginalised and a more restrictive tradition of detective criticism became dominant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See Stephen Knight, ‘Enter the Detective: Early Patterns of Crime Fiction’, in Gustav S. Klaus and Stephen Knight (eds), The Art of Murder: New Essays on Detective Fiction (Tübingen: Stauffenberg Verlag, 1998), pp. 10–25.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See Edgar Allan Poe. The Critical Heritage, ed. I.M. Walker, (London and New York. Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  3. The story, which was reissued as ‘The Great Pegram Case’ in 1895, was followed by ‘The Adventure of the Second Swag’ in 1904. See Stephen Knight, ‘Introduction’, in Robert Barr, The Triumphs of Eugène Valmont, ed. Stephen Knight (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1997), pp. x–xi. The two parodies are included in this text (pp. 204–20).

    Google Scholar 

  4. The former appeared only ten years later in Doyle’s autobiography, while the latter was published in a magazine in 1893. Both are included in The Uncollected Sherlock Holmes, ed. Richard Lancelyn Green (Harmondsworth Penguin, 1983), pp. 367–78.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See Bret Harte, Condensed Novels (1867); reprint (New York: P.F. Collies & Son, 1874), pp. 39–61.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A parody of Gillette’s play was published as early as 1901. See M. Watson and E. La Serre, Sheerluck Jones: a Dramatic Criticism in Four Paragraphs and as many Headlines (London and New York: Peter Schoffer, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  7. G.K. Chesterton, ‘A Defence of Detective Stories’ (1902), in The Art of the Mystery Story: a collection of Critical Essays, ed. Howard Haycraft (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1946), pp. 3–4.

    Google Scholar 

  8. G.K. Chesterton, ‘Dedication’, in The Man Who Was Thursday: a Nightmare, Introduction by Kingsley Amis (London: Penguin, 1986), pp. 5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  9. For an insightful reading of this ambiguous novel see Heather Worthington, ‘Anarchy in G.K. Chesterton’s The Man Who Was Thursday’, in ‘To Hell with Culture’: Anarchism and Twentieth Century British Literature, eds H. Gustav Klaus and Stephen Knight (Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 2005), pp. 21–34.

    Google Scholar 

  10. G.K. Chesterton, ‘The Blue Cross’, in The Complete Father Brown (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1981), p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  11. G.K. Chesterton, ‘Sherlock Holmes’, in A Handful of Authors: Essays on Books and Writers, ed. Dorothy Collins (London and New York: Sheed and Ward, 1953), p. 171.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Walter Pater, ‘Conclusion’, in The Renaissance: Studies in Art and Poetry, ed. Adam Phillips (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1986), p. 151.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Erskine Childers, The Riddle of the Sands: a Record of Secret Service, ed. David Trotter (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1998), p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  14. John Buchan, The Thirty-nine Steps, ed. Christopher Harvie (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1993), p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  15. See Richard Usborne, Clubland Heroes: a Nostalgic Study of the Recurrent Characters in the Romantic Fiction of Dornford Yates, John Buchan and ‘Sapper’ (London: Constable, 1953).

    Google Scholar 

  16. See Wesley K. Wark, ‘The Spy Thriller’, in Mystery and Suspense Writers: the Literature of Crime, Detection and Espionage I–II, eds Robin W. Winks and Maureen Corrigan (New York: Charles Scribner’s, 1998), p. 1201.

    Google Scholar 

  17. The Naval Intelligence Board was created in 1887 and the first Official Secrets Act was passed in 1889. The second Official Secrets Act (1911) led in turn to the creation of a counter-intelligence service, MI5, and of a secret intelligence service, MI6. See David A. Stafford, ‘Spies and Gentlemen: the Birth of the British Spy Novel. 1893–1914’, Victorian Studies, 24 (Summer 1981): 493–4.

    Google Scholar 

  18. T.S. Eliot, ‘Wilkie Collins and Dickens’, in Selected Essays (London: Faber and Faber, 1932), p. 460.

    Google Scholar 

  19. E.M. Wrong, ‘Introduction’, in Crime and Detection (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1926), p. xiv.

    Google Scholar 

  20. See Willard Huntington Wright, ‘Introduction’, in The Great Detective Stories: a Chronological Anthology (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1927), p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dorothy Sayers, ‘Introduction’, in Great Short Stories of Detection, Mystery and Horror (London: Gollancz, 1928), p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  22. H.D. Thomson, Masters of Mystery: a Study of the Detective Story (London: Collins, 1931), p. 52.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ford Madox Ford, ‘Conrad and the Sea’, in Mightier than the Sword: Memories and Criticisms (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1938), p. 95.

    Google Scholar 

  24. See Ford Madox Ford, The March of Literature: from Confucius’ Day to Our Own (Normal: The Dalkey Archive Press, 1994), pp. 845–6.

    Google Scholar 

  25. E.M. Forster, Aspects of the Novel (London: Edward Arnold, 1927), p. 88.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Clive Bloom, The Occult Experience and the New Criticism (Sussex: Harvester Press, 1986), pp. 80–1.

    Google Scholar 

  27. See Stephen Knight, Form and Ideology in Crime Fiction (London: Macmillan, 1980), pp. 112–15.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Agatha Christie, The Murder of Roger Ackroyd (London: HarperCollins, 1957), p. 234.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Charles Osborne, The Life and Crimes of Agatha Christie (London: Collins, 1982), p. 63.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Julian Symons, Bloody Murder: from the Detective Story to the Crime Novel: a History (New York: Viking, 1985 [1972]), p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Michel Foucault, ‘Two Lectures’, in Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977, ed. Colin Gordon (New York: Pantheon Books, 1980), p. 82.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2007 Maurizio Ascari

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ascari, M. (2007). Conclusion: the Age of Formula Fiction. In: A Counter-History of Crime Fiction. Crime Files Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230234536_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics