Skip to main content

Usable Pasts: Comparing Approaches to Popular and Public History

  • Chapter
People and their Pasts

Abstract

The publication of Roy Rosenzweig and David Thelen’s The Presence of the Past: Popular Uses of History in American Life in 1998 signalled a landmark in the empirical study of popular and public history.1 It outlined a way of conceptualising the character of popular and public forms of history, and was the first major attempt to generate sociological insight into the ways in which ordinary people understand and use history in their everyday lives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. R. Rosenzweig and D. Thelen, The Presence of the Past: Popular Uses of History in American Life ( New York: Columbia University Press, 1998 ).

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Zuckerman, ‘The Presence of the Present, The End of History’, The Public Historian, 22: 1 (2000) 19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. R. Rosenzweig, ‘Not A Simple Task: Professional Historians Meet Popular Historymakers’, The Public Historian, 22: 1 (2000) 37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. D. Thelen, ‘But Is It History?’, The Public Historian, 22: 1 (2000) 40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. However, there are also those historians who seek to bridge the gap between popular and academic history. Cf H. Kean, P. Martin and S. J. Morgan (eds) Seeing History: Public History in Britain Now ( London: Francis Boutle, 2000 ).

    Google Scholar 

  6. L. Jordanova, History in Practice (London: Arnold Publishers, 2000) chapter 6 and

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Liddington. Jordanova, History in Practice (London: Arnold Publishers, 2000) chapter 6 and J. Liddington, ‘What Is Public History?’, Oral History, 30: 1 (2002) 83–93.

    Google Scholar 

  8. C. L. Becker, Everyman His Own Historian: Essays on History and Politics ( New York: Crofts & Co., 1935 ) p. 235.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Samuel, ‘History Workshop Methods’, History Workshop Journal, 9 (1980) 168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. R. Samuel and P. Thompson (eds), The Myths We Live By ( London: Routledge, 1990 ), p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  11. The quote from Faulkner is not wholly accurate. The phrase in Requiem for a Nun reads: ‘The past is never dead. It’s not even past’. W. Faulkner, Requiem for a Nun ( Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1960 ), p. 81.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. Samuel, Theatres of Memory: Past and Present in Contemporary Culture ( London: Verso, 1994 ), p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  13. B. E. Jensen, Historie–livsverden og fag ( Copenhagen: Gyldendal, 2003 ).

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. Schörken, ‘Geschichte als Lebenswelt’, in K. Bergmann et al (eds) Handbuch der Geschichtsdidaktik, 1st edn ( Düsseldorf: Schwann, 1979 ), pp. 3–4.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. Schörken, ‘Geschichte als Lebenswelt’, in Bergmann et al (eds) Handbuch der Geschichtsdidaktik, 3rd edn ( Düsseldorf: Schwann, 1985 ), p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  16. E. Kessler, ‘Historia magistra vitae. Zur Rehabilitation eines überwundenen Topos’, in R. Schörken (ed.) Der Gegenwartsbezug der Geschichte ( Stuttgart: Klett, 1981 ), p. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. Schörken, Geschichte in der Alltagswelt. Wie uns Geschichte begegnet und was wir mit ihr machen ( Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1981 ), p. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Roy Rosenzweig, ‘How Americans Use and Think about the Past’, in P. N. Stearns et al (eds) Knowing, Teaching, and Learning History: National and International Perspectives ( New York: New York University Press, 2000 ), p. 280.

    Google Scholar 

  19. H. Welzer and H. J. Markowitsch, ‘Towards a Bio-psycho-social Model of Autobiographical Memory’, Memory, 13: 1 (2005) 73.

    Google Scholar 

  20. K. Nelson and R. Fivush, ‘The Emergence of Autobiographical Memory: A Social Cultural Developmental Theory’, Psychological Review, 111: 2 (2004) 486–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2009 Bernard Eric Jensen

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jensen, B.E. (2009). Usable Pasts: Comparing Approaches to Popular and Public History. In: Ashton, P., Kean, H. (eds) People and their Pasts. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230234468_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230234468_3

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-36109-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-230-23446-8

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics