Abstract
One of the remarkable features of medical ethics in Imperial Germany was its ambiguous and sometimes openly controversial relationship with the law. An area where a conflict between doctors’ and lawyers’ differing conceptions of the therapeutic relationship was played out was the issue of patient consent to medical interventions, in particular to surgical operations. This chapter traces the debate on this issue from its beginnings in the early 1890s to the First World War. As I will show, the traditional paternalism of physicians and surgeons was challenged in court decisions, which forced them to adopt practices of consent-seeking and to consider the appropriate amount of patient information before treatment. However, in spite of those new requirements, doctors kept a paternalistic attitude.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2009 Andreas-Holger Maehle
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Maehle, AH. (2009). Patient Information and Consent: Self-Determination versus Paternalism. In: Doctors, Honour and the Law. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230234390_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230234390_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-36313-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-23439-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)