Abstract
A distinctive part of our everyday adult way of making sense of one another involves making sense of actions performed for reasons. This practice, which has been the focus of intense scrutiny, frequently dons the somewhat unfortunate label ‘Folk Psychology’ (or FP) in the philosophical literature.1 It travels under many other names too: common-sense psychology; naïve psychology; Homo sapiens psychology; the person theory of humans; belief/ desire psychology — to name but a few.2
It is difficult to write today about understanding people without reference to the words Theory of Mind’. Google Scholar yields an incredible 36,000 publications using the term, 13,000 of which also refer to infants or children. And the manner in which the term is used is awesomely matter-of-fact — with a taken-for-grantedness hitherto reserved for those other staples of psychology such as growth spurt’, toilet training’, short-term memory’ and secure attachment’.
(Reddy and Morris, this volume, Chapter 5, p. 91)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2009 Daniel D. Hutto
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hutto, D.D. (2009). ToM Rules, but It Is Not OK. In: Leudar, I., Costall, A. (eds) Against Theory of Mind. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230234383_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230234383_12
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-230-55274-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-23438-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)