Abstract
Having arranged our selection of contested states in order of seniority, beginning with the most ‘junior’ pretender, we have to end with the Republic of China (ROC or Taiwan). With its contested statehood dating back to the late 1940s, the ROC was the doyen of this corps. But longevity was not the main reason why the ROC deserved special attention in this inquiry. Taiwan provided a rich illustration of the diversity among contested states and served as an outstanding example of how such an entity can skillfully exploit its limited international space. Unlike many contested states, the ROC was not a secessionist entity that proclaimed unilateral independence. Instead it owed its contested statehood to revolutionary regime change in mainland China, which reduced the ROC to the last outpost of the ancien regime. Even so Taiwan has managed to retain a measure of international recognition, with the result that its diplomatic isolation has not been as severe as that of most other contested states. Not content to be boxed in, the ROC has become a pioneer in the development of semiofficial foreign representation as a substitute for normal diplomatic ties. One of the reasons for its success in this endeavour was Taiwan’s economic muscle — a feature that has also helped the ROC develop its empirical statehood to a level far superior to that of any other contested state. Its extensive socio-economic ties with its veto state, China, added to Taiwan’s uniqueness.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Florence Elliott, A Dictionary of Politics, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, 1977, pp.89–90
AW Palmer, A Dictionary of Modern History, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, 1972, pp.78, 180
Guido Acquaviva, ‘Subjects of international law: A power-based analysis’, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 38(2), March 2005, pp.369–70
Jonathan I Charney & JRV Prescott, ‘Resolving cross-Strait relations between China and Taiwan’, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 94(3), July 2000, pp.454–8
Michael D Swaine, ‘Trouble in Taiwan’, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 83(2), March/April 2004, p.40.
Paul Johnson, Modern Times: A History of the World from the 1920s to the 1990s, Phoenix, London, 1992, p.388.
Robert A Madsen, ‘The struggle for sovereignty between China and Taiwan’, in Stephen D Krasner (ed.), Problematic Sovereignty: Contested Rules and Political Possibilities, Columbia University Press, New York, 2001, pp.147–8.
A LeRoy Bennett & James K Oliver, International Organizations: Principles and Issues, seventh edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 2002, p.89.
Robert A Madsen, p.176; Thomas D Grant, ‘Hallstein revisited: Unilateral enforcement of regimes of nonrecognition since the two Germanies’, Stanford Journal of International Law, Vol. 36, 2000, p.231.
Steven Kuan-tsyh Yu, ‘Republic of China’s international legal status as exemplified by the Taiwan Relations Act’, in Yu San Wang (ed.), The China Question: Essays on Current Relations between Mainland China and Taiwan, Praeger, New York, 1985, p.62
Deon Geldenhuys, South Africa and the China Question: A Case for Dual Recognition, East Asia Project, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, 1995, pp.9–10.
Eric Ting-Lun Huang, ‘Taiwan’s status in a changing world: United Nations representation and membership for Taiwan’, Annual Survey of International and Comparative Law, Vol. 9(1), 2003, p.85
Alan M Wachman, ‘A cold war of words’, Orbis, Vol. 46(4), Fall 2002, p.700. détente across the Taiwan Strait’, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 34(3), May 2001, p.510.
Alan M Wachman, p.698; Markus G Puder, ‘The grass will not be trampled because the tigers need not fight — New thoughts and old paradigms for détente across the Taiwan Strait’, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 34(3), May 2001, p.510.
Quoted by Jaw-Ling J Chang, ‘New dimensions of U.S.-Taiwan relations’, American Foreign Policy Interests, Vol. 26, 2004, p.309.
Markus G Puder, p.517; Stephen Allen, ‘Recreating “one China”: Internal self-determination, autonomy and the future of Taiwan’, Asia-Pacific Journal on Human Rights and the Law, Vol. 4(1), 2003, pp.24–5.
Steve Allen, ‘Statehood, self-determination and the “Taiwan question”’, Asian Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 9, 2000, p.199.
Ivan Shearer, ‘International legal relations between Australia and Taiwan: Behind the fac¸ade’, Australian Year Book of International Law, Vol. 21, 2000, p.121.
Leanne Kao, ‘Rallying relief’, Taiwan Review, Vol. 55(4), April 2005, pp.36–41;
Kelly Her, ‘Itinerant doctors’, Taiwan Review, Vol. 55(5), May 2005, pp.12–16.
Scott Pegg, ‘The “Taiwan of the Balkans”? The de facto state option for Kosovo’, Southeast European Politics, Vol. 1(2), December 2000, p.95.
James C Hsiung, ‘The ROC’s (Taiwan’s) quest for wider international participation’, American Foreign Policy Interests, Vol. 28, 2006, p.266.
Oscar Chung, ‘Being seen, being heard’, Taiwan Review, Vol. 54(11), November 2004, p.40
Oscar Chung, ‘Trade secrets on display’, Taiwan Review, Vol. 55(10), October 2005, pp.34–6.
Pat Gao, ‘In support of health’, Taiwan Review, Vol. 55(5), May 2005, p.6.
Quoted by Dennis van Vranken Hickey, ‘America, China and Taiwan: three challenges for Chen Shui-Bian’, Journal of Contemporary China, Vol. 15(48), August 2006, p.465.
Byron SJ Weng, ‘“One country, two systems” from a Taiwan perspective’, Orbis, Vol. 46(4), Fall 2002, p.731; Alan M Wachman, p.703; Taiwan Yearbook 2006, p.86.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2009 Deon Geldenhuys
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Geldenhuys, D. (2009). Taiwan. In: Contested States in World Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230234185_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230234185_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-36567-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-23418-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)