Skip to main content

Taiwan

  • Chapter

Abstract

Having arranged our selection of contested states in order of seniority, beginning with the most ‘junior’ pretender, we have to end with the Republic of China (ROC or Taiwan). With its contested statehood dating back to the late 1940s, the ROC was the doyen of this corps. But longevity was not the main reason why the ROC deserved special attention in this inquiry. Taiwan provided a rich illustration of the diversity among contested states and served as an outstanding example of how such an entity can skillfully exploit its limited international space. Unlike many contested states, the ROC was not a secessionist entity that proclaimed unilateral independence. Instead it owed its contested statehood to revolutionary regime change in mainland China, which reduced the ROC to the last outpost of the ancien regime. Even so Taiwan has managed to retain a measure of international recognition, with the result that its diplomatic isolation has not been as severe as that of most other contested states. Not content to be boxed in, the ROC has become a pioneer in the development of semiofficial foreign representation as a substitute for normal diplomatic ties. One of the reasons for its success in this endeavour was Taiwan’s economic muscle — a feature that has also helped the ROC develop its empirical statehood to a level far superior to that of any other contested state. Its extensive socio-economic ties with its veto state, China, added to Taiwan’s uniqueness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Florence Elliott, A Dictionary of Politics, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, 1977, pp.89–90

    Google Scholar 

  2. AW Palmer, A Dictionary of Modern History, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, 1972, pp.78, 180

    Google Scholar 

  3. Guido Acquaviva, ‘Subjects of international law: A power-based analysis’, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 38(2), March 2005, pp.369–70

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jonathan I Charney & JRV Prescott, ‘Resolving cross-Strait relations between China and Taiwan’, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 94(3), July 2000, pp.454–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Michael D Swaine, ‘Trouble in Taiwan’, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 83(2), March/April 2004, p.40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Paul Johnson, Modern Times: A History of the World from the 1920s to the 1990s, Phoenix, London, 1992, p.388.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Robert A Madsen, ‘The struggle for sovereignty between China and Taiwan’, in Stephen D Krasner (ed.), Problematic Sovereignty: Contested Rules and Political Possibilities, Columbia University Press, New York, 2001, pp.147–8.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A LeRoy Bennett & James K Oliver, International Organizations: Principles and Issues, seventh edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 2002, p.89.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Robert A Madsen, p.176; Thomas D Grant, ‘Hallstein revisited: Unilateral enforcement of regimes of nonrecognition since the two Germanies’, Stanford Journal of International Law, Vol. 36, 2000, p.231.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Steven Kuan-tsyh Yu, ‘Republic of China’s international legal status as exemplified by the Taiwan Relations Act’, in Yu San Wang (ed.), The China Question: Essays on Current Relations between Mainland China and Taiwan, Praeger, New York, 1985, p.62

    Google Scholar 

  11. Deon Geldenhuys, South Africa and the China Question: A Case for Dual Recognition, East Asia Project, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, 1995, pp.9–10.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Eric Ting-Lun Huang, ‘Taiwan’s status in a changing world: United Nations representation and membership for Taiwan’, Annual Survey of International and Comparative Law, Vol. 9(1), 2003, p.85

    Google Scholar 

  13. Alan M Wachman, ‘A cold war of words’, Orbis, Vol. 46(4), Fall 2002, p.700. détente across the Taiwan Strait’, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 34(3), May 2001, p.510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Alan M Wachman, p.698; Markus G Puder, ‘The grass will not be trampled because the tigers need not fight — New thoughts and old paradigms for détente across the Taiwan Strait’, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 34(3), May 2001, p.510.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Quoted by Jaw-Ling J Chang, ‘New dimensions of U.S.-Taiwan relations’, American Foreign Policy Interests, Vol. 26, 2004, p.309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Markus G Puder, p.517; Stephen Allen, ‘Recreating “one China”: Internal self-determination, autonomy and the future of Taiwan’, Asia-Pacific Journal on Human Rights and the Law, Vol. 4(1), 2003, pp.24–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Steve Allen, ‘Statehood, self-determination and the “Taiwan question”’, Asian Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 9, 2000, p.199.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ivan Shearer, ‘International legal relations between Australia and Taiwan: Behind the fac¸ade’, Australian Year Book of International Law, Vol. 21, 2000, p.121.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Leanne Kao, ‘Rallying relief’, Taiwan Review, Vol. 55(4), April 2005, pp.36–41;

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kelly Her, ‘Itinerant doctors’, Taiwan Review, Vol. 55(5), May 2005, pp.12–16.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Scott Pegg, ‘The “Taiwan of the Balkans”? The de facto state option for Kosovo’, Southeast European Politics, Vol. 1(2), December 2000, p.95.

    Google Scholar 

  22. James C Hsiung, ‘The ROC’s (Taiwan’s) quest for wider international participation’, American Foreign Policy Interests, Vol. 28, 2006, p.266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Oscar Chung, ‘Being seen, being heard’, Taiwan Review, Vol. 54(11), November 2004, p.40

    Google Scholar 

  24. Oscar Chung, ‘Trade secrets on display’, Taiwan Review, Vol. 55(10), October 2005, pp.34–6.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pat Gao, ‘In support of health’, Taiwan Review, Vol. 55(5), May 2005, p.6.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Quoted by Dennis van Vranken Hickey, ‘America, China and Taiwan: three challenges for Chen Shui-Bian’, Journal of Contemporary China, Vol. 15(48), August 2006, p.465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Byron SJ Weng, ‘“One country, two systems” from a Taiwan perspective’, Orbis, Vol. 46(4), Fall 2002, p.731; Alan M Wachman, p.703; Taiwan Yearbook 2006, p.86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2009 Deon Geldenhuys

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Geldenhuys, D. (2009). Taiwan. In: Contested States in World Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230234185_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics