Skip to main content

First Person Reflection: Origins of the Marginal Disposition

Theorists under the Big Top, Disorientated

  • Chapter
Writing Diaspora in the West
  • 69 Accesses

Abstract

While writing of the marginalist enterprise from another angle, Craig Ireland has adroitly traced something of its origins to the political and discursive fracas between the British and French Marxisms of the early 1960s. After various political skirmishes, cultural theory emerged in the late 1970s and early 1980s as a kind of feral subaltern inquiry that sought to gain ascendancy in the name of a certain politics of identity, an ‘immediate experience’ that ‘can as readily foster progressive subaltern politicking as they can exacerbate regressive, convulsive tribalism’.1 The British culturalist Marxist E.P. Thompson had savaged the French structuralist Marxism of Louis Althusser, arguing that a true counter-hegemonic political agenda required agency and the specific cultural experiences of its agents to conduct it; the Althusserian structuralist move, he argued, was simply too deterministic to allow for the necessary play of such agency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Craig Ireland, The Subaltern Appeal to Experience: Self-Identity, Late Modernity, and the Politics of Immediacy (Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2003), 4. Ireland’s main bout here is between British culturalist E.P. Thompson and French structuralist Louis Althusser, which, he rightly argues, spawned an entire growth industry–part popular ‘history from below’ (Alltagsgeschichte), part ‘High Theory’ and historiography, it continues today. His articulation of the ‘appeal to experience’ is an erudite piece of cultural critique to which justice cannot be done here.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Stuart Hall, ‘Cultural Studies: Two Paradigms’, in Tony Bennet, Graham Martin, Colin Mercer and Janet Woollacott eds. Culture, Ideology and Social Process (London: Batsford Academic and Educational Ltd, 1981), 25. See also ibid., 8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alexandre Kojève, Introduction to the Reading of Hegel: Lectures on the Phenomenology of Spirit, assembled Raymond Queneau, ed. Allan Bloom, trans. JamesH. Nichols (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jean-François Lyotard, ‘The dream-work does not think’, The Lyotard Reader, ed. Andrew Benjamin (Cambridge, Mass: Blackwell, 1992), 31.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Vincent B. Leitch, ‘Birmingham Cultural Studies: Popular Arts, Post-structuralism, Radical Critique’, The Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association, 24(1) Cultural Studies and New Historicism (Spring 1991): 74–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Richard Johnson, ‘What is Cultural Studies Anyway?’, Social Text 16 (Winter 1986–1987): 38.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Michel de Certeau, The Practice of Everyday Life, trans. Stephen Rendall (Berkley: University of California Press, 1984), xvii, 99.

    Google Scholar 

  8. John Barth, Giles Goat Boy or, The Revised New Syllabus (London: Secker and Warburg, 1967), x.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Edward W. Said, ‘The Politics of Knowledge’, Raritan (Summer 1991): 24, 26.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Edward W. Said, ‘Secular Criticism’, The World, the Text, and the Critic (London: Vintage, 1991), 3.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Walter Benjamin, ‘Theses on the Philosophy of History’, Illuminations, trans. Harry Zohn (London: Fontana, 1992), 251.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Homi Bhabha, ‘The World and the Home’, Social Text 31 /32 (1992): 152.

    Google Scholar 

  13. G.W.F. Hegel, The Phenomenology of Mind, trans. J.B. Baillie (New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1967), 219.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Martin Heidegger, Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. Parvis Emad and Kenneth Maly (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1994), 140.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time, trans. John Macquarie and Edward Robinson (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1962), 233.

    Google Scholar 

  16. G.W.F. Hegel, The Difference between Fichte’s and Schelling’s System of Philosophy, trans. H.S. Harris and Walter Cerf (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1977), 262.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Friedrich Nietzsche, On the Genealogy of Morals and Ecce Homo, ed. and trans. Walter Kaufmann and R.J. Hollingdale (New York: Vintage Books, 1989), 92.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Martin Heidegger, ‘Letter on Humanism’, Basic Writings, ed. David Farrell Krell (London: Routledge, 1996), 217.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Martin Heidegger, ‘Building Dwelling Thinking’, Poetry, Language, Thought, trans. Albert Hofstadter (New York: Harper and Row, 1971), 144, 154.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Homi K. Bhabha, ‘Dissemination: Time, Narrative, and the Margins of the Modern Nation’ in Nation and Narration, ed. Homi K. Bhabha (London: Routledge, 1993), 291–332.

    Google Scholar 

  21. George Steiner, Extraterritorial: Papers on Literature and the Language of Revolution (London: Faber and Faber, 1972), 4, viii.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2009 Peter McCarthy

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McCarthy, P. (2009). First Person Reflection: Origins of the Marginal Disposition. In: Writing Diaspora in the West. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230233843_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics