Skip to main content

Between Republicanism and the Enlightenment: Turgot and Adams

  • Chapter
Rethinking the Atlantic World
  • 333 Accesses

Abstract

For about thirty years republicanism has been claiming for itself increasingly broad swaths of the Age of Enlightenment. Thanks to numerous discoveries and reinterpretations of the period, a large number of versions of that period have emerged in which republican tenets have been opposed to, or superimposed on, Enlightenment points of view, or in which these two have been seen as simply moving in the same direction. Actually, it is not particularly easy to compare republicanism and the Enlightenment as historiographical paradigms. This is because the historical object known as republicanism has from the very beginning been proposed as a paradigm in and of itself, while the Enlightenment has rarely been considered one as such. In an attempt to shed some light on this issue, it is possible to contrast the work of two important historians who have both explored these phenomena, namely Franco Venturi and John Pocock.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. On the distinction between paradigm as political ideal and interpretative matrix see J.G.A. Pocock (1983) ‘Cambridge Paradigms and Scotch Philosophers: A Study of the Relations between the Civic Humanist and the Civil Jurisprudential Interpretation of Eighteenth Century Social Thought’, in I. Hont and M. Ignatieff (eds) Wealth and Virtue: The Shaping of Political Economy in the Scottish Enlightenment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 235–52.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. F. Venturi (1971) Utopia and Reform in the Enlightenment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. J.G.A. Pocock (1999) Barbarism and Religion, I, The Enlightenments of Edward Gibbon, 1737–1764 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 7–9

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Price (1777) Additional Observations on the Nature and Value of Civil Liberty, and the War with America, here quoted from (1991) Political Writings (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 78–82

    Google Scholar 

  5. K. Baker (1990) Inventing the French Revolution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 281ff.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. G. Schelle (1923) Œuvres de Turgot et documents le concernant (Paris: Alcan), vol. 4, pp. 627–8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2009 Maria Luisa Pesante

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pesante, M.L. (2009). Between Republicanism and the Enlightenment: Turgot and Adams. In: Albertone, M., Francesco, A.D. (eds) Rethinking the Atlantic World. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230233805_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230233805_4

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-30244-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-230-23380-5

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics