Skip to main content

From African Missions to Global Sisterhood: The Mothers’ Union and Colonial Christianity, 1900–1930

  • Chapter
Empires of Religion

Part of the book series: Cambridge Imperial and Post-Colonial Studies Series ((CIPCSS))

  • 286 Accesses

Abstract

Recent studies of feminist networks in the British Empire have highlighted the difficulties of reconciling universal claims of sisterhood with competing hierarchical categories of race, class and nation. Although the discourse of ‘imperial feminism’ which emerged in Britain in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries projected womanhood as a common basis of oppression and source of empowerment, many scholars have argued that British women’s reform movements legitimized the ‘civilizing mission’ through the oppositional image of non-white and working-class woman’s degradation, by claiming that only fellow women could rescue their sisters from the Indian zenana or the East End slum.1 Since feminists, philanthropists and missionaries could only establish their own authority outside the home by casting British womanhood against the uncivilized female ‘other’, white, middle-class women won their own emancipation at the expense of their ‘heathen’ sisters, preventing any real possibility of partnership between them. Scholars of gender and empire have thus underscored how these missions of sisterhood established a divisive legacy of British women ‘speaking for’, rather than with, non-Western women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Mothers Union Journal (MUJ), March 1930, 15. See also D. Marshall, Around the World in 100 Years: A History of the Work of the Mothers’ Union Overseas (London: Mothers’ Union, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  2. See A. Davin, ‘Imperialism and Motherhood’, History Workshop Journal, V (1978) 9–66; C. Summers, ‘Intimate Colonialism: The Imperial Production of Reproduction in Uganda, 1907–1925’, Signs, XVI (1991) 787–807.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Maude to Gertrude King, 13 November 1912, MU/OS/005/13/08. In 1913, the Central Council in London passed the resolution that (1) ‘as a result of experience … Native Branches should be run on a communicant basis’, and that (2) divorce would disqualify any potential or standing member from MU membership, ‘even if the disciplinary laws of the Church admitted her to Communion at the end of an interval of years.’ In conveying this development to Bishop King, the central secretary added that ‘the passing of this minute was really due to the example set by Madagascar’. Maude to George King, 13 March 1914, MU/OS/005/13/08; see also Violet B. Lancaster, A Short History of the Mothers’ Union (London: Mothers’ Union, 1958), p. 119.

    Google Scholar 

Further reading

  • Allman, J., S. Geiger, and N. Musisi, eds. Women in African Colonial Histories. (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowie, F., D. Kirkwood, and S. Ardener, eds. Women and Missions: Past and Present, Anthropological and Historical Perspectives (Oxford: Berg, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, A. M. Burdens of History: British Feminists, Indian Women, and Imperial Culture, 1865–1915 (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis-Dehqani, G. Religious Feminism in an Age of Empire: CMS Women Missionaries in Iran, 1869–1934 (Bristol: Center for Comparative Studies in Religion and Gender, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, M. T. and N. C. Lutkehaus, eds. Gendered Missions: Women and Men in Missionary Discourse and Practice (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, P., ed. Gender and Empire (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, C., ed. Gender and Imperialism (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, S., ed. Women, Religion, and Feminism in Britain, 1750–1900 (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Semple, R. A. Missionary Women: Gender, Professionalism, and the Victorian Idea of Christian Mission (Woodbridge: Boydell and Brewer, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Strobel, M. and N. Chaudhuri, eds. Western Women and Imperialism: Complicity and Resistance (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2008 Elizabeth E. Prevost

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Prevost, E.E. (2008). From African Missions to Global Sisterhood: The Mothers’ Union and Colonial Christianity, 1900–1930. In: Carey, H.M. (eds) Empires of Religion. Cambridge Imperial and Post-Colonial Studies Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230228726_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230228726_12

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-30262-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-230-22872-6

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics