Skip to main content

The Profit-Motive and Morality

  • Chapter
The Morality of Money

Abstract

Our attitudes towards the profit-motive are more vexed than might at first appear. On the one hand, we typically deem profit-seeking socially desirable, even necessary. We appreciate the plethora of commodities that markets, fuelled by the profit-motive, produce and, like Adam Smith, are well aware that it is not from the benevolence of the butcher or the baker that we expect to find bread or meat upon our table.

There are not many of us who remain sober when we have the opportunity to grow wealthy, or prefer measure to abundance. The great multitude of men are of a completely contrary temper — what they desire they desire out o f all measure — when they have the option o f making a reasonable one they prefer to make an exorbitant one.

Plato, The Laws, Bk. XI, 918d–918e

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. R. Chandler, ‘The Long Good-bye’, in The Chandler Collection, Vol. 2 (London: Picador, 1983), p. 403.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Smith, An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, Vol. 1, R.H. Campbell and A.S. Skinner (General Editors), A. Todd (Textual Editor) (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976), p. 145.

    Google Scholar 

  3. As H. Grotius wrote in The Law of War and Peace (New York: Bobbs-Merrill, 1962), ‘Acts are of a mixed character, either in their essential elements or through the association of another act. Thus [for instance] if I knowingly buy a thing at a price higher than it is worth, and give the excess in price to the seller, the act will be partly gift, partly purchase’ (p. 346). It requires drawing distinctions within the marketplace to generate varieties of profit-motives.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cited in G. Dostaler and B. Maris, ‘Dr. Freud and Mr. Keynes on Money and Capitalism’, in J. Smithin (ed.), What is Money? (London: Routledge, 2000), p. 249.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Aristotle, The Politics of Aristotle, trans. E. Barker (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1946), Bk. I, Ch. IX, [1257b28], p. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cited in E. Rothschild, Economic Sentiments: Adam Smith, Condorcet and the Enlightenment (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2001), p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J.K. Galbraith, Economics in Perspective: A Critical Histoiy (Boston: Houghton Miflin Company, 1987), p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Interestingly in the Gorgias [494–495], Callicles has a conception of pleasure in which endlessness is a constitutive feature. Callicles suggests that the pleasure of living depends on maintaining the largest possible influx. See Plato, The Collected Dialogues, in E. Hamilton and H. Cairns (eds) (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  9. The Medieval thinkers later suggested that action undertaken for the sake of wealth has no limits. See J. Baldwin, ‘The Medieval Theories of Just Price: Romanists, Canonists, and Theologians in the Twelfth and Thirteenth Centuries’, Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 49, part 4, 1959, p. 13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Interestingly Keynes used a similar argument, but in his case it involved banana-farmers. See J.M. Keynes, A Treatise on Money, Vol. 1 (London: Macmillan, 1930), p. 176.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Plato, ‘The Republic’, in The Dialogues of Plato, Vol. II, trans. B. Jowett, 4th edition (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1953), [373e].

    Google Scholar 

  12. Plato, The Laws, translated with an introduction by T.J. Saunders (Harmondsworth, Middl.: Penguin, 1970), Bk. X, [918d-918e].

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Cowley, ‘Of Avarice’ [1665], in J. Gross (ed.), The Oxford Book of Essays (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991), pp. 27–28.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. De Roover, San Bernadino of Sienna and Sant’antonino of Florence: The Two Great Economic Thinkers of the Middle Ages (Boston: Baker Library, 1967), p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  15. From A.A. Long, Epictetus: A Stoic and Socratic Guide to Life (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), p. 115.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. See C.J. Berry, The Idea of Luxury: A Conceptual and Historical Investigation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994), p. 67.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. See E. Roll, A History of Economic Thought (London: Faber and Faber, 1938).

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. Schopenhauer, ‘Human Nature’, in The Essays of Arthur Schopenhauer, trans. T.B. Saunders (Mila, U.S.A.: Kessing Press, 2004), p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  19. D. Wood, Medieval Economic Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), p. 102.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. R. Leachman, A History of Economic Ideas (New York: Harper & Row, 1959).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pribram suggests that Oresme was the first theologian to deal in a separate trea-tise with a specific economic problem, the original nature of economies and their debasement. See K. Pribram, A History of Economic Reasoning (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1983), p. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  22. J.W. Baldwin, Masters, Princes and Merchants: The Social Views of Peter the Chanter and His Circle (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1970), p. 265.

    Google Scholar 

  23. K. Marx, Early Writings [1], Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts, trans. T.B. Bottomore (London: Watts, 1963), p. 191.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cicero, ‘On Duties’ III, Cicero, Selected Works (Harmondsworth, Middl.: Penguin, 1974), pp. 166–167.

    Google Scholar 

  25. T. Carlyle, ‘The Gospel of Mammonism’, in Past and Present (London: Champan and Hall, 1843), p. 126.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Janet Coleman, ‘Property and Poverty’, in J.H. Burns (ed.), The Cambridge Histoty of Medieval Political Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988), p. 631.

    Google Scholar 

  27. R.H. Tawney, Religion and the Rise of Capitalism (London: John Murray, 1926), p. 35.

    Google Scholar 

  28. See T. Lynch, ‘Temperance, Temptation and Silence’, Philosophy, April 2001, 76, no. 296, pp. 251–269.

    Google Scholar 

  29. D. Wiggins, ‘Truth Invention and the Meaning of Life’, in Needs, Values, Truth: Essays in the Philosophy of Value, 3rd edition (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998), p. 100.

    Google Scholar 

  30. A. Flew, ‘The Profit Motive’, Ethics, 1976, 86, p. 314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bishop Butler, Fifteen Sermons Preached at the Rolls Chapel and A Dissertation upon the Nature of Virtue, W.R. Matthews (ed.) (London: G. Bell & Sons Ltd., 1949 [1726]), pp. 251–252.

    Google Scholar 

  32. See M. Weber, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (London: Unwin, 1930 [1904/1905]).

    Google Scholar 

  33. The philosopher C.A. Mace (1894–1971), discussing motivation, recalls Dos-toevsky’s remark that no one ever acts from a single motive. He rejects the suggestion that the only effective incentive is the pay packet, because this overlooks ‘the complexity of this motive’. See C.A. Mace, Selected Papers (London: Methuen, 1973), pp. 178–179.

    Google Scholar 

  34. J.J. Mansbridge notes: ‘This is a sustained argument in favour of the idea that people often take account of both other individuals’ interest and the com-mon good when they decide what constitutes a “benefit” that they want to maximize’, Introduction to J.J. Mansbridge (ed.), Beyond Self-Interest (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990), p. x.

    Google Scholar 

  35. R. Nozick, Anarchy, State and Utopia (New York: Basic Books, 1975), pp. 28–33.

    Google Scholar 

  36. J. Elster, ‘Selfishness and Altruism’, in J.J. Mansbridge (ed.), Beyond Self-Interest (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990), p. 49.

    Google Scholar 

  37. See B. Gordon, Economic Analysis before Adam Smith (London: Macmillan, 1975), p. 88.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  38. G. O’Brien, An Essay on Medieval Economic Teaching (London: A.M. Kelley, 1920), p. 154.

    Google Scholar 

  39. L. Jardine, Worldly Goods (London: Macmillan, 1996), pp. 324–325.

    Google Scholar 

  40. J. Wesley, ‘The Use of Money’, in The Works of John Wesley, Vol. VI (Grands Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan Publishing House, 1872), pp. 124–136.

    Google Scholar 

  41. E.J. Mishan, The Costs of Economic Growth (Harmondsworth, Middl.: Penguin, 1967), p. 205.

    Google Scholar 

  42. D. Hume, ‘Of the Dignity or Meanness of Human Nature’, in J. Gross (ed.), The Oxford Book of Essays (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991), pp. 85–86.

    Google Scholar 

  43. G. Trease, The Condottieri: Soldiers of Fortune (London: Thames and Hudson, 1970), p. 150. Another mercenary from the period, Federigo, once claimed that ‘[K]eeping faith is better still and worth more than all the gold in the world’ (Trease, The Condottieri, p. 317).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2008 Adrian Walsh and Tony Lynch

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Walsh, A., Lynch, T. (2008). The Profit-Motive and Morality. In: The Morality of Money. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230227804_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics