Abstract
When the Multi-fibre Arrangement (MFA) was phased out on 1 January 2005, textile and garment1 exporters in World Trade Organization (WTO) member countries in principle became subject to tough competition in the non-quota market (WTO 1996; Raffaelli 1998; Nordås 2004). Before 2005, there was concern about the possible negative impact of the MFA phase-out in countries such as Bangladesh that believed they were protected by the quota regime (Bhattacharya and Rahman 2001: 9–12). Since January 2005, however, Bangladesh has continued to perform well. There are several explanations for this performance such as: (1) that the effect of MFA phase-out was and still is limited because China agreed to export restrictions on textile and garment products to the US and EU in 2005 (Yamagata 2006),2 (2) that international textile and garment buyers would not import exclusively from China in order to diversify risks (Saxena and Wiebe 2005), or (3) that more time is needed to truly assess the effects of phasing out the MFA.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Baland, Jean-Marie, Jean Dreze and Luc Leruth (1999) ‘Daily Wages and Piece Rates in Agrarian Economies’. Journal of Development Economics 59(2): 445–61.
Bhattacharya, Debapriya and Mustafizur Rahman (2001) ‘Bangladesh’s Apparel Sector: Growth Trends and the Post-MFA Challenges’. In Pratima Paul-Majumder and Binayak Sen (eds), Growth of Garment Industry in Bangladesh: Economic and Social Dimensions. Dhaka: Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies, pp. 2–26.
Easterly, William (2003) ‘The Political Economy of Growth without Development: a Case Study of Pakistan’. In Dani Rodrik (ed.) In Search of Prosperity. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 439–72.
Freeman, Richard B. and Morris M. Kleiner (1998) ‘The Last American Shoe Manufacturers: Changing the Method of Pay to Survive Foreign Competition’, NBER Working Paper Series, no. 6750. Cambridge, Mass.
Fukunishi, Takahiro (2005) ‘Competitiveness of the Apparel Industry in Kenya: Comparison with Bangladesh’. In Katsumi Hirano (ed.) Empirical Analysis of African Economies. Chiba: Institute of Developing Economies, pp. 235–63 (in Japanese).
GoP (Government of Pakistan) (2004) Pakistan Labour Force Survey 2003–2004. Karachi: :Statistics Division, Federal Bureau of Statistics.
Higuchi, Yoshio (1996) Labour Economics. Tokyo: Toyokeizai (in Japanese).
Hirano, Katsumi (2005) ‘Poverty Linkage between Agriculture and Industry’. In Katsumi Hirano (ed.) Empirical Analysis of African Economies. Chiba: Institute of Developing Economies, pp. 131–90 (in Japanese).
Krugman, Paul and Maurice Obstfeld (eds) (2000) ‘Resources and Trade: the Heckscher–Ohlin Model’. In International Economics: Theory and Policy, 5th edn. Reading; Mass.: Addison Wesley, pp. 66–91.
Lazear, Edward P. (1986) ‘Salaries and Piece Rates’. The Journal of Business 59(3): 405–31.
Lazear, Edward P. (2000) ‘Performance Pay and Productivity’. The American Economics Review 90(5): 1346–61.
Makino, Momoe (2006a) ‘Pakistan Labour-Intensive Industries Struggling with Cheap Products from China: Footwear Case’. Ajia Keizai 47(6): 55–82 (in Japanese).
Makino, Momoe (2006b) ‘Competitiveness of the Apparel Industry in Pakistan in the post-MFA Era’. In Hiroshi Sato (ed.) Globalization in South Asia: Its Impact on Employment and Labour Issues, Research Report Series 2005-IV-08. Chiba: Institute of Developing Economies, pp. 55–105 (in Japanese).
Murayama, Mayumi (2006) ‘Globalization and Female Employment in Bangladesh: ReadyMade Garment Workers in Post-MFA Era’. In Mayumi Murayama (ed.) Employment in Readymade Garment Industry in Post-MFA Era: the Cases of India, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka, JRP Series no. 140. Chiba: Institute of Developing Economies, pp. 53–101.
Nordås, Hildegunn K. (2004) ‘The Global Textile and Clothing Industry post the Agreement on Textiles and Clothing’, WTO Discussion Papers no. 5. Geneva: World Trade Organization.
OTEXA (Office of Textiles and Apparel) (2005) ‘Announcement of Request for Bilateral Textile Consultations with the Government of the People’s Republic of China’, OTEXA Federal Register Notices, 20 May 2005, Office of Textiles and Apparel, US Department of Commerce (http://otexa.ita.doc.gov/fr2005.htm, accessed January 2006).
OTEXA (Office of Textiles and Apparel) (2006) Trade Data — U.S. Imports and Exports of Textiles and Apparel (http://otexa.ita.doc.gov/msrpoint.htm, downloaded January 2006).
Raffaelli, Marcelo (1998) ‘Bringing Textiles and Clothing into the Multilateral Trading System’. In Jagdish Bhagwati and Mathias Hirsch (eds) The Uruguay Round and Beyond. Berlin: Springer, pp. 51–9.
Saxena, Sanchita B. and Franck Wiebe (2005) ‘The Phase-Out of the Multi-Fiber Arrangement: Policy Options and Opportunities for Asia’. San Francisco: Asia Foundation.
SBP (State Bank of Pakistan) (2006) Statistical Bulletin. State Bank of Pakistan (http://www.sbp.org.pk/reports/stat_reviews/bulletin/2006/index.htm, downloaded December 2006).
Shearer, Bruce (1996) Piece-Rates, Principal-Agent Models, and Productivity Profiles: Parametric and Semi-Parametric Evidence from Payroll Records’. The Journal of Human Resources 31(2): 275–303.
Shearer, Bruce (2004) ‘Piece Rates, Fixed Wages and Incentives: Evidence from a Field Experiment’. Review of Economic Studies 71(2): 513–34.
Siegmann, Karin Astrid (2005) ‘The Agreement on Textiles and Clothing: Potential Effects on Gendered Employment in Pakistan’. International Labour Review 144(4): 401–21.
SMEDA (Small and Medium Enterprise Development Authority) (2005) ‘Pakistan’s Textile Garments: the Exports Growth Engine’. Lahore: Small and Medium Enterprise Development Authority, Ministry of Industries, Production and Special Initiatives, Government of Pakistan.
UNIDO (United Nations Industrial Development Organization) (2005a) INDSTAT3 ISIC Rev.2 (CD-ROM). Vienna: United Nations Industrial Development Organization.
UNIDO (United Nations Industrial Development Organization) (2005b) INDSTAT4 ISIC Rev.2&3 (CD-ROM). Vienna: United Nations Industrial Development Organization.
United Nations. COMTRADE Database, Statistics Division (http://unstats.un.org/unsd/comtrade).
US GAO (Government Accountability Office) (2005) ‘U.S.-China Trade: Textile Safeguard Procedures Should Be Improved’. Report to Congressional Committees, GAO-05–296 (http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05296.pdf, accessed January 2006).
World Bank (1988) World Tables 1987 The Fourth Edition. Washington, DC: World Bank.
World Bank (1988) (1998) World Development Indicators 1998. Washington, DC: World Bank.
World Bank and SMEDA (2003) ‘Improving the Investment Climate in Pakistan: an Investment Climate Assessment’. Mimeo.
WTO (World Trade Organization) (1996) ‘Textiles’, Press Brief, Singapore WTO Ministerial 1996 (http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/minist_e/min96_e/textiles.htm, accessed January 2006).
WTO (World Trade Organization) — (2001) ‘WTO Successfully Concludes Negotiations on China’s Entry’, WTO News: 2001 Press releases, Press/243. 17 September 2001 (http://www.wto.org/english/news_e/pres01e/pr243e.htm. accessed January 2006).
Yarnagata, Tatsufumi (2006) ‘Textile Goods Trade: Consequence of Liberalization’. Ajiken World Trend no. 125. February: 20–3 (in Jananese).
Zaidi, Akbar S. (1999) Issues in Pakistan’s Economy. Karachi: Oxford University Press.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2008 Institute of Developing Economies (IDE), JETRO
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Makino, M. (2008). Competitiveness of the Garment Industry in Pakistan with Particular Focus on Piece Rate Workers. In: Sato, H., Murayama, M. (eds) Globalization, Employment and Mobility. IDE-JETRO Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230227750_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230227750_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-35959-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-22775-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)