Abstract
The marketing mix concept is quintessential to marketing. It follows directly from and expresses the very nature of marketing. It is inherent to anymarketing situation – even if this ismore obvious in somesituations than in others. Logically therefore its origin and traces are intertwined with those of the marketing discipline. The antecedents of marketing go way back into the history of many economies, even if these show different time patterns (Fullerton, 1988). Taken together a study of marketing history reveals that marketing theory and managerial practice resulted from fundamentally and substantially changing market circumstances in the Western world, mainly around the end of the nineteenth and during the first half of the twentieth century. An increasing divide between production and consumption implied the structural presence of supply as well as of demand in diverse product and service areas. Over the course of history, both supply and demand potential tended to become increasingly substantial as well as heterogeneous and consequently also more or less non-transparent. Importantly also, even if potential demand typically increased (for example, because of rising incomes) potential supply was or became typically even larger in relative terms (for example, because of innovations). The emergence of these buyers’ markets forced marketers to engage in all sorts of marketing efforts to attract the attention
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alderson, W. (1954), ‘Factors governing the development of marketing channels,’ in R. M. Clewitt (ed.), Marketing Channels for Manufactured Products, Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
Arndt, Johan (1985), ‘On making marketing science more scientific. The role of orientations, paradigms, metaphors, and puzzle solving,’ Journal of Marketing, 49(3) (Summer): 11–23.
Bartels, R. (1962), The Development of Marketing Thought, Homewood, IL: R. D. Irwin.
Booms, B. H. and M. J. Bitner (1981), ‘Marketing strategies and organization structures for service firms,’ in J. H. Donnelly and W. R. George (eds), Marketing of Services, Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association, pp. 47–51.
Borden, N. (1964), ‘The concept of the marketing mix,’ Journal of Advertising Research, 4: 2–7.
Bremer, Kristine and Moonkyu Lee (1997), ‘Metaphors in marketing: review and implications for marketers,’ Advances in Consumer Research, 24: 419–24.
Bucklin, L. P. (1966), A Theory of Distribution Channel Structure, Berkeley, CA: IBER Special Publications.
Bucklin, L. P. (1972), Competition and Evolution in the Distributive Trades, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Cornelissen, Joep P. (2003), ‘Metaphor as a method in the domain of marketing,’ Psychology & Marketing, 20(3): 209–25.
Cornelissen, Joep P., Lars Thöger Christensen and Pieter Vijn (2006), ‘Understanding the development and diffusion of integrated marketing communications – a metaphorical perspective,’ NRG Working Paper no. 06-02.
Culliton, J. W. (1948), ‘The management of marketing costs,’ Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, Boston, MA.
Fullerton, Ronald A. (1988), ‘How modern is modern marketing? Marketing’s evolution and the myth of the “production era”,’ Journal of Marketing, 52(1) (January): 108–25.
Hunt, Shelby D. (1976), Marketing Theory, Columbus, OH: Grid.
Hunt, Shelby D. (2002), Foundations of Marketing Theory: Toward a General Theory of Marketing, Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
Hunt, Shelby D. and Anil Menon (1994), ‘Is it “metaphor at work” or is it “metaphors, theories, and models at work”?,’ in G. Laurent, G. Lilien and B. Bras (eds), Research Traditions in Marketing, Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publications, pp. 426–32.
Hunt, Shelby D. and Anil Menon (1995), ‘Metaphors and competitive advantage: evaluating the use of metaphors in theories of competitive strategy,’ Journal of Business Research, 33: 81–90.
Kotler, P. (1972), ‘A generic concept of marketing,’ Journal of Marketing, 36: 46–54.
McCarthy, Jerome (1960), Basic Marketing: a Managerial Approach, Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
Rust, Roland T. and Tuck Siong Chung (2006), ‘Marketing models of service and relationships,’ Marketing Science, 25(6) (November-December): 560–80.
Van den Bulte, Christophe (1991), ‘The concept of the marketing mix revisited – a case analysis of metaphor in marketing theory and management,’ the Vlerick School of Management, University of Ghent, Belgium.
Van den Bulte, Christophe (1992), ‘The concept of the marketing mix revisited – a case analysis of metaphor in marketing theory and management,’ paper presented at the Conference on Research Traditions in Marketing, Brussels, European Institute for Advanced Studies in Management, 9–10 January.
Van den Bulte, Christophe (1994a), ‘Metaphor at work,’ in G. Laurent, G. Lilien and B. Bras (eds), Research Traditions in Marketing, Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publications, pp. 405–25.
Van den Bulte, Christophe (1994b), ‘Can literal truth safeguard models and theories from metaphor?,’ in G. Laurent, G. Lilien and B. Bras (eds), Research Traditions in Marketing, Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publications, pp. 433–4.
van Waterschoot, Walter (1995), ‘The marketing mix,’ in M. J. Baker (ed.), Companion Encyclopedia of Marketing, London: Routledge, Chapter 25, pp. 443–8.
van Waterschoot, Walter (1997), ‘The marketing mix,’ in M. Warner (ed.), The International Encyclopaedia for Business and Management, London: Thomson Business Press, pp. 3307–14.
van Waterschoot, Walter (1999), ‘The marketing mix,’ in M. J. Baker (ed.), The IEBM Encyclopedia of Marketing, London: Thomson, pp. 317–30.
van Waterschoot Walter (2000), ‘The marketing mix as a creator of differentiation,’ in K. Blois (ed.), The Oxford Textbook of Marketing, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 183–211.
van Waterschoot, Walter (2007), ‘Is the Marketing Discipline Product(ion) Orientated,’ presentation, EIRASS conference, San Francisco.
van Waterschoot, Walter and Joeri De Haes (2001), ‘Entries on the Marketing Mix: Explications and Extensions; Functions; Functional Classification; Influencing Demand; Pragmatic Classifications; Origins of the Metaphor and the Concept; Criticism; Instruments; Multiple Functions of Instruments,’ in P. Kitchen and T. Proctor (ed.), The Informed Student Guide to Marketing, London: Thomson Learning, pp. 175–97.
van Waterschoot, Walter and Els Gijsbrechts (2003), ‘Knowledge transfer through marketing textbooks: the Howard and Sheth typology as a case in point,’ in P. Kitchen (ed.), The Future of Marketing, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 59–81.
van Waterschoot, Walter and Christophe Van den Bulte (1992), ‘The 4P classification of the marketing mix revisited,’ Journal of Marketing, 56(4) (October): 83–93.
van Waterschoot, Walter, Piyush Kumar Sinha, Steve Burt, Joeri De Haes and Annouk Lievens (2004), ‘Revisiting the concept and classification of distribution service outputs,’ working paper, Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad, available at https://www.iimahd.ernet.in/publications/public.
van Waterschoot, Walter, Leen Lagasse and Robert Bilsen (2006), Marketingbeleid: Theorie en Praktijk, 11th revised edition, Antwerpen: De Boeck.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2008 contributors
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
van Waterschoot, W., De Haes, J. (2008). Marketing Mix Metaphorosis: the Heavy Toll of too much Popularity. In: Kitchen, P.J. (eds) Marketing Metaphors and Metamorphosis. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230227538_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230227538_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-54709-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-22753-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)