Skip to main content

Human Enhancement and Personal Identity

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: New Waves in Philosophy ((NWIP))

Abstract

In this essay, I will investigate the implications of human enhancement for personal identity and assess likely social and ethical consequences of these changes. Human enhancement, also called human augmentation, is an emerging field within medicine and bioengineering that aims to develop technologies and techniques for overcoming current limitations of human cognitive and physical abilities (Naam, 2004; Wilsdon and Miller, 2006; Garreau, 2005; Parens, 1998; Agar, 2004). Technologies developed in this field are called human enhancement technologies (HETs). HETs rely on advances in genetic engineering, pharmacology, bioengineering, cybernetics and nanotechnology. In these fields, it is becoming possible to develop techniques that improve human functions beyond a normal range. The envisioned applications are limitless, and include the enhancement of human traits like muscular strength, endurance, vision, intelligence, mood and personality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Agar, N. (2004) Liberal Eugenics: in Defence of Human Enhancement (Blackwell Publishers).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977) ‘Self-Efficacy: toward a Unifying Theory of Behaviour Change’, Psychological Review, 84: 191–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baylis, F. andJ. Robert (2004)‘The Inevitability of Genetic Enhancement Technologies’, Bioethics, 18(1): 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bordo, S. (1998) ‘Braveheart, Babe, and the Contemporary Body’, in E. Parens (ed.) Enhancing Human Traits: Ethical and Social Issues ( Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press ), pp. 189–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bostrom N. (2003a) ‘Human Genetic Enhancements: a Transhumanist Perspective’, The Journal of Value Inquiry, 37 (4): 493–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bostrom N. ((2003b) ‘Transhumanist Values’, in F. Adams (ed.) Ethical Issues for the 21st Century (Philosophical Documentation Center Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bostrom N. ( (2005) ‘In Defense of Posthuman Dignity’, Bioethics, 19 (3): 202–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brey, P. (2005) ‘Prosthetics’, in C. Mitcham (ed.) Macmillan Encyclopedia of Science, Technology and Ethics (Macmillan Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cash, T. and T. Pruzinsky (1990) Body Images: Development, Deviance and Change (Guilford Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • DeGrazia, D. (2005) ‘Enhancement Technologies and Human Identity’, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 30: 261–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, C. (2003) Better Than Well: American Medicine Meets the American Dream (Norton).

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, S. (1973) ‘The Self-Concept Revisited: or a Theory of a Theory’, American Psychologist, 28: 405–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, R. (1992) Who You Are: Personality and Its Development (Franklin Watts).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freitas, R. (1999) Nanomedicine, Vol. I: Basic Capabilities ( Georgetown, Tex.: Landes Bioscience).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (2002) Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution ( Farrar, Straus and Giroux).

    Google Scholar 

  • Garreau, J. (2005) Radical Evolution: the Promise and Peril of Enhancing Our Minds, Our Bodies—and What It Means to Be Human (Doubleday).

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity. Self and Society in the Late Modern Age ( Cambridge: Polity Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (2003) The Future of Human Nature (Polity Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1985) ‘A Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the 1980’s’, Socialist Review, 80: 56–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogle, L. (2005) ‘Enhancement Technologies and the Body’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 34: 695–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kass, L. (2002) Life, Liberty and the Defense of Dignity: the Challenge for Bioethics (Encounter Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurzweil, R. (2005) The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology (Viking Adult).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M. and J. Brooks-Gunn (1979) Social Cognition and the Acquisition of Self ( New York: Plenum Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Little, M. (1998) ‘Cosmetic Surgery, Suspect Norms, and the Ethics of Complicity’, in E. Parens (ed.) Enhancing Human Traits: Ethical and Social Issues ( Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H. and E. Wurf (1987) ‘The Dynamic Self-Concept: a Social Psychological Perspective’, Psychological Review, 38: 299–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naam, Ramez (2004) More Than Human: Embracing the Promise of Biological Enhancement (Joseph Henry Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Parens, E. (ed.) (1998) Enhancing Human Traits: Ethical and Social Issues ( Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press ).

    Google Scholar 

  • President’s Council on Bioethics, The (2003) Beyond Therapy: Biotechnology and the Pursuit of Happiness (New York: Regan Books), retrieved at http://www.bioethics.gov/reports/beyondtherapy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice ( Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1993) Political Liberalism (Columbia University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J. and F. Baylis (2003) ‘Crossing Species Boundaries’, The American Journal of Bioethics, 3 (3): 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandel, M. (2002) ‘What’s Wrong with Enhancement’, retrieved at: http://www.bioethics.gov/background/sandelpaper.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon, C. (2005) ‘The Price of Beauty in South Korea’, BBC News, 3 February. Retrieved at http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/from_our_own_correspondent/4229995.stm

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrauger, J. and T. Scheneman (1979) ‘Symbolic Interactionist View of Self-Concept: through the Looking Glass Darkly’, Psychological Bulletin, 86: 549–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, D. (1997) Consumer Culture and Modernity (Polity Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stock, G. (2002) Redesigning Humans: Our Inevitable Genetic Future (Houghton Mifflin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stock, G. and J. Campbell (eds) (2000) Engineering the Human Germline: an Exploration of the Science and Ethics of Altering the Genes We Pass to Our Children (Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (ed.) (1982) Social Identity and Intergroup Relations ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1989) Sources of the Self: the Making of the Modern Identity ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wachbroit, R. (2000) ‘Human Enhancement Uses of Biotechnology: Overview’, in T. Murray and M. Mehlman (eds) Encyclopedia of Ethical, Legal and Policy Issues in Biotechnology (Wiley-Interscience).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilsdon, J. and P. Miller (eds) (2006) Better Humans: the Politics of Human Enhancement and Life Extension (Demos).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, R., P. Miller, S. Cowles and A. Wilson (1979) The Self-Concept. Vol. 2: Theory and Research on Selected Topics ( Lincoln, Neb.: University of Nebraska Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, S. (2005) Designer Evolution: a Transhumanist Manifesto (Prometheus Books).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2009 Philip Brey

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brey, P. (2009). Human Enhancement and Personal Identity. In: Olsen, J.K.B., Selinger, E., Riis, S. (eds) New Waves in Philosophy of Technology. New Waves in Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230227279_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics