Skip to main content

Philosophy of Technology as Empirical Philosophy: Comparing Technological Scales in Practice

  • Chapter
New Waves in Philosophy of Technology

Part of the book series: New Waves in Philosophy ((NWIP))

Abstract

Throughout its history, science and technology studies (STS) have been inspired by continental philosophy in various guises. In this essay we argue that inspiration does not have to be one-way but that philosophy might likewise learn from STS. Engaging philosophy through STS enables us to develop the notion of empirical philosophy proposed by STS scholar Annemarie Mol (2002). Empirical philosophy takes seriously the ways in which actors deal in practice with what are usually considered philosophical concerns: what is good, what is right, what is true, and so on. Thus John Law and Annemarie Mol have argued that:

Most everyday practices make use of, or try to create, scales to measure or contrast ‘goods’ and ‘bads’. This opens a space for an empirical philosophy. An ethnographic interest in practice can be combined with a philosophical concern with ‘the good’ to explore which ‘good/bad’ scale is being enacted, and how this is being done. (Law and Mol, 2002, p. 85)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Achterhuis, H. (ed.) (1999) American Philosophy of Technology: the Empirical Turn ( Bloomington: Indiana University Press ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Appadurai, A. (ed.) (1986) The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective ( Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity ( London: Sage Publications).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski, L. and L. Thévenot (2006) On Justification Economies of Worth, trans. by Catherine Porter ( Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgmann, A. (1984) Technology and the Character of Contemporary Life–a Philosophical Inquiry ( Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, A. E. (2005) Situational Analysis: Grounded Theory after the Postmodern Turn ( Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Flor, Jan Riis (1982) ‘Den logiske positivisme’, in P. Lübcke (ed.) Vor tids filosofi ( Copenhagen: Politikkens forlag ), pp. 114–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology ( Englewood Cliffs, NY: Prentice-Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G. and A. L. Strauss (1967). Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies of Qualitative Research ( Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastrup, K. (2004) ‘Getting it Right: Knowledge and Evidence in Anthropology’, Anthropological Theory, 4: 455–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1977) The Question Concerning Technology, and Other Essays (New York: Harper & Row).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E. (1995) Cognition in the Wild ( Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihde, D. (1990) Technology and the Lifeworld—from Garden to Earth ( Bloomington: Indiana University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihde, D. (2002) Bodies in Technology ( Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, C. B. (2007) ‘Infrastructural Fractals: Revisiting the Micro-Macro Distinction in Social Theory’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 25(5): 832–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1994) ‘On Technical Mediation’, Common Knowledge, 3 (Fall): 29–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. and A. Mol (2002) ‘Local Entanglements or Utopian Moves: an Inquiry into Train Accidents’, in M. Parker (ed.) Organisation and Utopia ( Oxford: Blackwell ), pp. 82–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lützhöft, M. (2004) ‘The Technology is Great When it Works: Maritime Technology and Human Integration on the Ships’ Bridge’. Dissertation, University of Linköping.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M. (1997) ‘Theorizing Practice’, Human Studies, 20: 335–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mol, A. (1999) ‘Ontological Politics: a Word and Some Questions’, in J. Law and J. Hassard (eds), Actor Network Theory and After ( Oxford: Blackwell ), pp. 74–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mol, A. (2002) The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice ( Durham: Duke University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mol, A. and M. de Laet (2000) ‘The Zimbabwe Bush Pump: Mechanics of a Fluid Technology’, Social Studies of Science, 30 (2): 225–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parks, L. (2005) Cultures in Orbit: Satellites and the Televisual ( Durham: Duke University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, A. (ed.) (1992) Science as Practice and Culture ( Chicago: University of Chicago Press ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabinow, P. (1986) ‘Representations are Social Facts: Modernity and Post-Modernity in Anthropology’, in J. Clifford and G. E. Marcus (eds) Writing Culture—the Poetics and Politics of Ethnography ( Los Angeles: University of California Press ), pp. 234–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, E. (1978) Orientalism—Western Conceptions of the Orient ( London: Pengu in Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, T. R., K. Knorr Cetina et al. (eds) (2001) The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory ( London: Routledge ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Selinger, E. M. (2007) ‘Technology Transfer: What Can Philosophers Contribute?’ Philosophy and Public Affairs Quarterly, 27 (1/2): 12–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, S. L. and J. Griesemer (1989) ‘Institutional Ecology, “Translations”, and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology’, Social Studies of Science, 19: 387–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strathern, M. (1996) ‘Enabling Identity? Biology, Choice and the New Reproductive Technologies’, in S. Hall and P. du Gay (eds) Questions of Cultural Identity ( London: Sage ), pp. 37–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, S. (1994) The Social Theory of Practices: Tradition, Knowledge and Presuppositions ( Cambridge: Polity Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsing, A. L. (2005) Friction: an Ethnography of Global Connection ( Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Viveiros de Castro, E. (2004) ‘Exchanging Perspectives: the Transformation of Objects into Subjects in Amerindian Ontologies’, Common Knowledge, 10 (3): 463–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. ( 1958 [1953]) Philosophical Investigations ( Oxford: Basil Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2009 Casper Bruun Jensen and Christopher Gad

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jensen, C.B., Gad, C. (2009). Philosophy of Technology as Empirical Philosophy: Comparing Technological Scales in Practice. In: Olsen, J.K.B., Selinger, E., Riis, S. (eds) New Waves in Philosophy of Technology. New Waves in Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230227279_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics