Abstract
Ever since the Enlightenment, ethics has had a humanist character. Not ‘the good life’ but the individual person now has a central place in it, taken as the fountainhead of moral decisions and practices. Yet, however much our high-technological culture is a product of the Enlightenment, this very culture also reveals the limits of the Enlightenment in ever more compelling ways. Not only have the ideals of manipulability and the positivist slant of Enlightenment thinking been mitigated substantially during the past decades, but also the humanist position that originated from it. The world in which we live, after all, is increasingly populated not only by human beings but also by technological artefacts that help to shape the ways we live our lives — technologies have come to mediate human practices and experiences in myriad ways (cf. Verbeek, 2005).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Achterhuis, H. (1995) ‘De moralisering van de apparaten’, Socialisme en Democratie, 52: 1, 3–12.
Dorrestijn, S. (2004). ‘Bestaanskunst in de technologische cultuur: over de ethiek van door techniek beïnvloed gedrag’. Master’s thesis, University of Twente.
Foucault, M. (1990) [1984] The Care of the Self—the History of Sexuality, vol. 3 ( London: Pengu in Books).
Foucault, M. (1992) [1984] The Use of Pleasure—the History of Sexuality, vol. 2 ( London: Pengu in Books).
Foucault, M. (1997) ‘What is Enlightenment?’, in M. Foucault, Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth, ed. by Paul Rabinow ( New York: The New Press).
Harbers, H. (2005) ‘Epilogue: Political Materials–Material Politics’, in H. Harbers (ed.) Inside the Politics of Technology ( Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press ).
Heidegger, M. (1951) ‘Das Ding’, in Vorträge und Aufsätze ( Pfullingen: Neske).
Heidegger, M. (1976) [1947] ‘Brief über den Humanismus’, in Wegmarken, Gesamtausgabe 9 ( Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann ), pp. 313–64.
Heidegger, M. (1977) ‘The Age of the World Picture’, in The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays (New York: Harper & Row) [translation of ‘Die Zeit des Weltbildes’, in Holzwege (Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1950)].
Kant, I. (2002) Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals (New Haven and London: Yale University Press [1785]).
Latour, B. (1993) We Have Never Been Modern ( Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).
Latour, B. (1997) De Berlijnse sleutel ( Amsterdam: Van Gennep).
Latour, B. (1999) Pandora’s Hope ( Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press).
Latour, B. (2002) ‘Morality and Technology: the End of the Means’, Theory, Culture & Society, 19 (5/6): 247–60.
Latour, B. (2005) ‘From Realpolitik to Dingpolitik, or How to Make Things Public’, in Bruno Latour and Peter Weibel (eds) Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy ( Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press ).
Midden, C. (2006) ‘Sustainable Technology or Sustainable Users?’, in P.P. Verbeek and A. Slob (eds) User Behavior and Technology Development—Shaping Sustainable Relations between Consumers and Technologies ( Dordrecht: Springer ), pp. 191–200.
Mitchell, L. (2001) Baby’s First Picture: Ultrasound and the Politics of Fetal Subjects ( Toronto: University of Toronto Press).
Muis, H. (2006) ‘Eternally Yours: Some Theory and Practice on Cultural Sustainable Products’, in P.P. Verbeek and A. Slob (eds) User Behavior and Technology Development–Shaping Sustainable Relations between Consumers and Technologies ( Dordrecht: Springer ), pp. 277–93.
Rapp, R. (1998) ‘Refusing Prenatal Diagnosis: the Meanings of Bioscience in a Multicultural World’, Science, Technology, and Human Values, 23 (1): 45–70.
Safranski, R. (1999) Martin Heidegger: Between Good and Evil ( Harvard: Harvard University Press).
Sloterdijk, P. (1999) Regeln für den Menschenpark ( Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp).
Smith, A. (2003) ‘Do You Believe in Ethics? Latour and Ihde in the Trenches of the Science Wars (Or: Watch Out, Latour, Ihde’s Got a Gun)’, in D. Ihde and E. Selinger (eds) Chasing Technoscience: Matrix for Materiality ( Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press ).
Verbeek, P.P. (2005) What Things Do: Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design (University Park, Pa: Pennsylvania State University Press).
Verbeek, P.P. (2006a) ‘The Morality of Things—a Postphenomenological Inquiry’, in E. Selinger (ed.) Postphenomenology: a Critical Companion to Ihde ( New York: State University of New York Press ).
Verbeek, P.P. (2006b), ‘Materalizing Morality—Design Ethics and Technological Mediation’, Science, Technology and Human Values, 31 (3): 361–80.
Verbeek, P.P. (2008) ‘Obstetric Ultrasound and the Technological Mediation of Morality—a Postphenomenological Analysis’, Human Studies 2008 (1): 11–26.
Vries, G. de (1999) Zeppelins: over filosofie, technologie en cultuur ( Amsterdam: Van Gennep).
Zechmeister, I. (2001) ‘Foetal Images: the Power of Visual Technology in Antenatal Care and the Implications for Women’s Reproductive Freedom’, Health Care Analysis, 9 (4): 387–400.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2009 Peter-Paul Verbeek
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Verbeek, PP. (2009). Cultivating Humanity: towards a Non-Humanist Ethics of Technology. In: Olsen, J.K.B., Selinger, E., Riis, S. (eds) New Waves in Philosophy of Technology. New Waves in Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230227279_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230227279_12
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-230-22000-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-22727-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)