Advertisement

‘Parties in Converse’: Literary and Economic Dialogue in Michael Almereyda’s Hamlet

Chapter
  • 27 Downloads

Abstract

In his magisterial study of the interrelations that make up the literary text, Gérard Genette introduces the term ‘paratextuality’, which encompasses the ‘peritext’ (internal ‘devices and conventions’ such as forewords, dedications and prefaces) and the ‘epitext’ (external features such as publishers’ announcements, ‘authorial correspondence’ and ‘oral confidences’ [Genette 1997, 1, 5; Macksey 1997, xviii]). Unconnected to ‘the text within the same volume’, the ‘epitext’ circulates ‘freely, in a virtually limitless physical and social space’ (Genette 1997, 344). But this does not mean, Genette argues, that the ‘epitext’ is ideologically divorced from the host ‘text’; rather, the two inhabit a ‘zone of transition [and] … translation’ — they are in constant dialogue, with the claims of the one informing the other, and the tendencies of the other fashioning the one (ibid., 2). ‘Paratexts’ as a whole are among the elements of culture that prevent the ‘text’ from enjoying a hermetically sealed existence and ‘immutable identity’, and ensure that it partakes of the ‘empirical (sociohistorical) reality of … public [life]’, conversing with its environment and reaching out beyond itself in negotiations with its own meaning and reflections upon its dynamic potential (ibid., 408).

Keywords

Late Capitalism Camera Shutter Magisterial Study Home Movie Economic Dialogue 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abbate, Alessandro. 2004. ‘To Be or Inter-Be’: Almereyda’s end-of-millennium Hamlet. Literature/Film Quarterly 32. 2.Google Scholar
  2. Almereyda, Michael. 2000. William Shakespeare’s ‘Hamlet’: A Screenplay Adaptation. London: Faber.Google Scholar
  3. Anderegg, Michael. 2004. Cinematic Shakespeare. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  4. Anderegg, Michael. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. ed. and trans. Michael Holquist and Caryl Emerson. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1986. Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. Trans. Ladislaw Matejka and I R Titunik. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Ball, Kirstie and Webster, Frank. 2003. The Intensification of Surveillance. In The Intensification of Surveillance: Crime, Terrorism and Warfare in the Information Age, eds. Kirstie Ball and Frank Webster. London: Pluto.Google Scholar
  7. Bogart, Michele H. 1989. Public Sculpture and the Civic Ideal in New York City, 1890–1930. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Buber, Martin. 1947. I and Thou, trans. Ronald Gregor Smith. Edinburgh: Clark.Google Scholar
  9. Crowl, Samuel. 2003. Shakespeare at the Cineplex: The Kenneth Branagh Era. Athens: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dandeker, Christopher. 1990. Surveillance, Power and Modernity: Bureaucracy and Discipline from 1700 to the Present Day. Oxford: Polity.Google Scholar
  11. Debord, Guy. 1983. Society of the Spectacle. Detroit: Black and Red.Google Scholar
  12. Downs, Donald A. 1989. The New Politics of Pornography. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  13. Edwards, Tim. 2000. Contradictions of Consumption: Concepts, Practices and Politics in Consumer Society. Buckingham and Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Foucault, Michel. 1986. Of Other Spaces. Diacritics, 16. 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Genette, Gérard. 1997. Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation, trans. Jane E Lewin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Giddens, Anthony. 1990. The Consequences of Modernity. Oxford: Polity.Google Scholar
  17. Goldman, Robert and Papson, Stephen. 1998. Nike Culture: The Sign of the Swoosh. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Hatchuel, Sarah. 2004. Shakespeare, from Stage to Screen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hodgdon, Barbara. 2003. Re-Incarnations. In Remaking Shakespeare: Performance Across Media, Genres, and Cultures, eds. Pascale Aebischer, Edward J. Esche and Nigel Wheale. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  20. Holquist, Michael. 1981. Introduction. In Mikhail Bakhtin, The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, ed. and trans. Michael Holquist and Caryl Emerson. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  21. Holquist, Michael. 1990. Dialogism: Mikhail Bakhtin and his World. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jameson, Fredric. 1991. Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  23. Jameson, Fredric. 1992. The Geopolitical Aesthetic: Cinema and Space in the World System. London: BFI Publishing.Google Scholar
  24. Jess, Carolyn. 2004. The Promethean Apparatus: Michael Almereyda’s Hamlet as Cinematic Allegory. Literature/Film Quarterly. 32. 2.Google Scholar
  25. Johnson, Thomas H. and Wish, Harvey, eds. 1966. The Oxford Companion to American History. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Lanier, Douglas M. 2002. Shakescorp Noir. Shakespeare Quarterly. 53. 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lehmann, Courtney. 2002. Shakespeare Remains: Theatre to Film, Early Modern to Postmodern. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Lotman, Jurij. 1977. The Structure of the Artistic Text, trans. R. Vroon. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  29. Lyon, David. 2003. Surveillance after September 11. Oxford: Polity.Google Scholar
  30. Macksey, Richard. 1997. Foreword to Gérard Genette, Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation, trans. Jane E. Lewin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. McRobbie, Angela. 1986. Postmodernism and Popular Culture. In Postmodernism: ICA Documents 5, ed. Lisa Appignanesi. London: ICA.Google Scholar
  32. Rowe, Katherine. 2003. ‘Remember me’: Technologies of memory in Michael Almereyda’s Hamlet. In Shakespeare, the Movie, II: Popularizing the Plays on Film, TV, Video, and DVD, eds. Richard Burt and Lynda E. Boose. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Segal, Lynne. 1993. Does Pornography Cause Violence? The Search for Evidence. In Dirty Looks: Women, Pornography, Power, eds. Pamela Church Gibson and Roma Gibson. London: BFI.Google Scholar
  34. Shakespeare, William. 1987. Hamlet, ed. Harold Jenkins. London and New York: Methuen.Google Scholar
  35. Shakespeare, William. 2000. Hamlet. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  36. Sinfield, Alan. 1992. Faultlines: Cultural Materialism and the Politics of Dissident Reading. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  37. Soja, Edward W. 1995. Heterotopologies: A Remembrance of Other Spaces in the Citadel-LA. In Postmodern Cities and Spaces, eds. Sophie Watson and Katherine Gibson. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  38. Wood, David, Konvitz, Eli and Ball, Kirstie. 2003. The Constant State of Emergency?: Surveillance after 9/11. In The Intensification of Surveillance: Crime, Terrorism and Warfare in the Information Age, eds. Kirstie Ball and Frank Webster. London: Pluto.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2007

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations