Skip to main content

Parallels and Divergences of Integration in Ukraine and Belarus

  • Chapter
The CIS, the EU and Russia

Part of the book series: Studies in Central and Eastern Europe ((SCEE))

Abstract

The past century was in many respects an exceptional one for the European continent. Not only was it scarred by two World Wars, but it was at the same time marked by several economic and political integration processes. Some of these processes were democratic and economically motivated, whereas others were considered totalitarian and ideologically motivated. The twenty-first century is seeing a continuation of integrational processes. The EU’s most recent enlargement has both strengthened and weakened the European Union. In Eastern Europe, the Commonwealth of Independent States persists as a looser structure of post-Soviet states. It is often claimed that CIS integration mirrors the EU example. It is therefore interesting to look whether ‘parallels of integration’ really exist between the European Union and the integration initiatives among the members of the Commonwealth of Independent States. Second, the countries ‘in between’ deserve some attention as well. Both members of the CIS, Belarus and Ukraine simultaneously find themselves at the border of an enlarged Europe, and are often labelled ‘outsider states’. This chapter intends to assess divergent institutional developments and parallels of integration in Ukraine and Belarus after 1991.

‘When we blindly adopt a religion, a political system, a literary dogma, we become automatons. We cease to grow.’

(Anaïs Nin)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Three different trajectories pointed out by Taras Kuzio (European, Westernizing, and Russophile) also illustrate these different paths, in T. Kuzio, ‘Promoting Geopolitical Pluralism in the CIS: GUUAM and Western Foreign Policy’, Problems of Post-Communism, 47 (2000): 25–35.

    Google Scholar 

  2. W. Powell and P.J. DiMaggio, The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (Illinois: University of Chicago Press, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  3. D’Anieri, R. Kravchuk and T. Kuzio, Politics and Society in Ukraine (Boulder: Westview, 1999): 86.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Caiden, in M. Nordberg, ‘State and Institution Building in Ukraine’, in T. Kuzio (ed.), Contemporary Ukraine: Dynamics of Post-Soviet Transformation (London/NY: M.E. Sharpe, 1998): 41.

    Google Scholar 

  5. In Belarus, the legislature was overall weak and compliant. When reform minded Stanislau Shushkevich was, moreover, ousted from the Supreme Soviet chairmanship on claims of corruption, Kebich was in pole position for the 1994 presidential elections. Olga Belova rightly remarks that the situation in Russia, Belarus and Ukraine required a similar presidential model: ‘a famous Soviet administrative manager, who had been in charge of some high offices in the Communist Party apparatus and in central executive bodies, organizes the transfer of his position of power in the next presidential institution’, in O. Belova-Gille, ‘The Difficulties of Elite Formation in Belarus after 1991’, in E. Korosteleva, C. Lawson and R. Marsh (eds), Contemporary Belarus: Between Democracy and Dictatorship (London: Curzon Press, 2003): 57. This trajectory was most obvious in Belarus, since the institution of presidency was tailored to fit then Prime Minister Viacheslau Kebich.

    Google Scholar 

  6. W. Powell and P.J. DiMaggio, ‘The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields’, in American Sociological Review, 48 (1983): 147–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2007 Lien Verpoest

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Verpoest, L. (2007). Parallels and Divergences of Integration in Ukraine and Belarus. In: Malfliet, K., Verpoest, L., Vinokurov, E. (eds) The CIS, the EU and Russia. Studies in Central and Eastern Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230210998_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics