Abstract
Cooperation among states and regional organizations can take on various forms. Governance modes vary from supranational to intergovernmental; material policies may include trade, common markets, the environment, and fundamental rights, from soft security issues to military, strategic politics and geopolitics. How does cooperation take place and why are regional organizations such as the European Union (EU) interested in associating with other regions or states? The following contribution tries to develop an answer by focusing on the EU’s Ostpolitik.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
M. Jachtenfuchs (ed.), Europäische Integration (Opladen: Leske & Budrich 2003).
C. Dupont and H. Engelen, ‘Elusive Interregionalism: The EU and Eastern Europe’, in V. Aggarwal and E. Fogarty (eds), EU Trade Strategies (New York: Palgrave Macmillan 2004): 169.
For the concepts of societal, soft and human security see H. Moroff, ‘Introduction and Theoretical Considerations’, in H. Moroff (ed.), European Soft Security Policies — The Northern Dimension, (Helsinki/Berlin: Ulkopolitiinen Institute, 2002): 24.
R.O. Keohane and J.S. Nye, Power and Interdependence (Boston: Little, Brown, 1977).
B. Buzan et al., Security: A Framework for Analysis (Boulder/London: Lynne Rienner, 1998).
J.P. Olsen, ‘The many faces of Europeanization’, in Journal of Common Market Studies 40/5 (2002): 921–51.
P. Pierson, ‘The Path to European Integration. A Historical Institutionalist Analysis’, in: Comparative Political Studies, 29/2 (1996): 123–63.
M. Filtenborg et al., ‘An Alternative Theoretical Approach to EU Foreign Policy. “Network Governance” and the Case of the Northern Dimension Initiative’, in: Cooperation and Conflict, 37/4 (2002): 387–407.
B. White, ‘The European Challenge to Foreign Policy Analysis’, in European Journal of International Relations, 5/1 (1999): 37–66.
I. Manners et al. (eds), The Foreign Policies of European Union Member States (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000).
T. Christiansen et al., ‘Fuzzy Politics Around Fuzzy Borders: The European Union’s “Near Abroad”, in: Cooperation and Conflict, 35/4 (2000) 389–415.
H. Smith, European Foreign Policy: What It Is and What It Does (London: Pluto Press, 2002).
C. Bretherton et al.The European Union as a Global Actor (London: Routledge, 1999).
T. Risse et al., “Something Rotten and the Social Construction of Social Constructivism: Comment on Comments”, in Journal of European Public Policy, 6/5 (2001): 775–82.
A. Malcom, ‘Frontiers of the European Union’, in Advancing the Union: Report by the Independent Commission for the Reform of the Institutions and Procedures of the Union (London: ICRI, 2000): xiii.
H. Moroff, ‘The EU’s Northern Soft Security Policy: Emergence and Effectiveness’, in H. Moroff (ed.), European Soft Security Policies - The Northern Dimension, Helsinki/Berlin: Ulkopolitiinen Institute 2002): 150–227.
See M. Emerson, The Elephant and the Bear (Brussels: CEPS 2001).
L. Fairlie et al., Are Borders Barriers? EU Enlargement and the Russian Region of Kaliningrad (Berlin/Helsinki: Finnish Institute of International Affairs and Institut für Europäische Politik, 2001).
V. Shemiatenkov, EU-Russia: The Sociology of Approximation (Brussels 2003) accessed at http://www.ecsanet.org/ecsaworld6/contributions/session2/Shemiatenkov.doc on 10 February 2006.
H. Timmermann, ‘Die Europäische Union und Russland — Dimensionen und Perspektiven der Partnerschaft’, in Integration 19/4 (1996): 195–207.
W. Franzen, Haarland, H.P. and Niessen, H.J. Transformationsbarometer Osteuropa 2001 (Frankfurt a.M: Campus-Verlag, 2001): 23–5.
I. Kempe, ‘Die EU als Modernisierungspartner für Russland’, in O. Hillenbrand, Der schwerfällige Riese: Wie Russland den Wandel gestalten soll (Gütersloh: Verlug Bertalsman SK-J King 2003): 279.
H. Haukkala, ‘Two Reluctant Regionalizers? The European Union and Russia in Europe’s North’, UPI Working Paper 32 (Helsinki: Ulkopolitiinen Institute, 2001): 7.
H. Höhmann et al.Auf dem Weg zu neuen gesamteuropäischen Strukturen? Die Europäische Gemeinschaft, Russland und die GUS (Cologne: Bundesinstitut für Ostwissenschaftliche und Internationale studien, 1992): 42.
Y. Borko, Rußland und die Europäische Union: Perspektiven der Partnerschaft (Cologne: Bundesinstitut für Ostwissenschaftliche und Internationale studien, 1996): 8–11.
J. Gower, ‘Russia and the European Union’, in: M. Webber (ed.), Russia and Europe: Conflict or Cooperation? (Basingstoke: Macmillan 2000): 66–98.
See F. Riccardi, ‘A Look Behind the News’, Bulletin Quotidien Europe 8224, 3, 4 June (2002): 3.
On this front, much has been achieved already. See M. Webber, ‘Third-Party Inclusion in European Security and Defence Policy: A Case Study on Russia’, in European Foreign Affairs Review, 6 (2001): 407–26.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2007 Holger Moroff
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Moroff, H. (2007). Russia, the CIS and the EU: Secondary Integration by Association?. In: Malfliet, K., Verpoest, L., Vinokurov, E. (eds) The CIS, the EU and Russia. Studies in Central and Eastern Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230210998_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230210998_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-35604-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-21099-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)