Skip to main content

The ‘Meso’ Level: The Region vs. the Département

  • Chapter
Subnational Government

Part of the book series: French Politics, Society and Culture Series ((FPSC))

  • 104 Accesses

Abstract

While most unitary states have at the most one level of intermediate or ‘meso’ government,1 France has two: the department, created at the time of the French Revolution, and its great rival, the region, which has emerged from the shadows of the French institutional labyrinth only with great difficulty. Each institution has its partisans: ‘departmentalists’ and ‘regionalists’ — each is founded in a particular understanding of the French state and how its territory should be organized. The ‘departmentalists’ are firm Jacobins and believe in the unity and indivisibility of the Republic, while the ‘regionalists’ are more like the Girondins and believe it necessary to recognize the diversity of France. It is not surprising that geographers such as Jean-François Gravier or historians such as Fernand Braudel should be among the regionalists, while national politicians such as François Mitterrand on the left or Jacques Chirac on the right should favour the department. But the region slowly asserted itself throughout the second half of the 20th century in the form of indirectly elected agencies of regional development, and this slow emergence came to fruition with the creation of elected regional councils by the 1982 decentralization reforms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. F. Dreyfus and F. D’Arcy, Les Institutions Politiques et Administratives de la Franc ( Paris: Economica, 1985 ).

    Google Scholar 

  2. For a detailed account see: V. Schmidt, Democratizing France: the political and administrative history of decentralization ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990 ).

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Delcamp, Le Sénat et la Décentralisation ( Paris: Economica, 1991 ), p. 103.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Quoted in P. Deuvet, ‘The Role of the département’, Local Government in France (Paris: La Documentation Française, 2001), a chapter on which the following section draws.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J.P. Worms, ‘Le préfet et ses notables’, Sociologie du Travail no. 3, juillet-août 1966, pp. 249–275.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J.-J. Dayries and M. Dayries, La Régionalisation 3rd edition (Paris: PUF, 1978) mention that there were 44 reports or bills tabled along these lines during the Third Republic.

    Google Scholar 

  7. For a good history of this movement, see M. Nicolas, Emsav: Histoire du mouvement breton ( Paris, Syros, 1982 ).

    Google Scholar 

  8. See J. Loughlin, ‘Regionalism and Ethnic Nationalism in France’, in Yves Mény and Vincent Wright (eds), Centre-periphery relations in Western Europe ( London: Allen & Unwin, 1985 );

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Loughlin, Regionalism and Ethnic Nationalism in France: a Case-study of Corsica ( Florence: European University Institute, 1989 ).

    Google Scholar 

  10. See J. Loughlin, Regionalism and Ethnic Nationalism in France: a Case-study of Corsica ( Florence: European University Institute, 1989 )

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Loughlin and E. BernabéuCasanova, Le Nationalisme Corse: Genèse, succès et échec ( Paris: L’Harmattan, 1997 ).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jean-François Gravier, Paris et le désert français ( Paris, Le Portulan, 1947 ).

    Google Scholar 

  13. There are numerous studies on this movement. A classical study is J. E. S. Hayward, ‘From functional regionalism to functional representation in France’, Political Studies, vol. XVII, March 1969, pp. 48–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. See also Michel Nicolas, Emsav: Histoire du mouvement breton ( Paris, Syros, 1982 ).

    Google Scholar 

  15. See L. Cohen-Solal, C. Bunodière, Les nouveaux socialistes (Paris: 1977 ).

    Google Scholar 

  16. On the attitudes of the French left to the regional problem, see Yves Mény, Centralisation et décentralisation dans le débat politique français ( 1945–1969 ) ( Paris: Librairie Générale de Droit et de Jurisprudence, 1974 );

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Phlipponeau, ‘La gauche et le régionalisme (1945–1974)’, in Gras et Livet (eds.), Régions et régionalisme en France (du XVIIIe siècle jusqu’à nos jours) ( Paris: PUF, 1977 ), pp. 529–543;

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. Rocard, ‘La région, une idée neuve pour la Gauche’, and P. Sadran, ‘Les socialistes et la région’, both in Pouvoirs, no. 19 (1981), pp. 131–147; for the attitude of the PCF see L’Humanité, 12/6/1976.

    Google Scholar 

  19. The issue arose when Pierre Joxe, then Minister of the Interior, reformed the Corsican Statut Particulier in 1991, with a parliamentary bill that included a reference to ‘le people corse’. See H. Hintjens, J. Loughlin and C. Olivesi, ‘The Status of Overseas France and Corsica’, in J. Loughlin and S. Mazey (eds), The End of the French Unitary State? Ten Years of Regionalization in France ( London: Frank Cass Ltd., 1995 ).

    Google Scholar 

  20. See Jacques Rodin, Le sacre des notables, Fayard, 1985. See also Yves Mény, ‘La décentralisation’, in Administration 82 (Institut International d’Administration Publique), Paris, 1983, pp. 13–57

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yves Mény and by the same author, ‘Decentralization in Socialist France’, West European Politics, Vol. 7, no. 1, 1984, pp. 65–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. See M. Keating, J. Loughlin and K. Deschouwer, Culture, Institutions and Regional Development: a Study of Eight European Regions (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar), 2003, chapter 5, ‘Brittany and Languedoc-Roussillon.’

    Google Scholar 

  23. The result was: 51 per cent voted NO; 49 per cent voted YES! On the background to the referendum see J. Loughlin and C. Olivesi (eds), Autonomies Insulaires: vers une politique de différence pour la Corse ( Ajaccio: Albiana, 1999 )

    Google Scholar 

  24. H. Hintjens, J. Loughlin and C. Olivesi), ‘The Status of Overseas France and Corsica’ in J. Loughlin and S. Mazey, The End of the French Unitary State? Ten Years of Regionalization in France ( London: Frank Cass Ltd., 1995 ).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2007 John Loughlin

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Loughlin, J. (2007). The ‘Meso’ Level: The Region vs. the Département. In: Subnational Government. French Politics, Society and Culture Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230210622_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics