Abstract
While most unitary states have at the most one level of intermediate or ‘meso’ government,1 France has two: the department, created at the time of the French Revolution, and its great rival, the region, which has emerged from the shadows of the French institutional labyrinth only with great difficulty. Each institution has its partisans: ‘departmentalists’ and ‘regionalists’ — each is founded in a particular understanding of the French state and how its territory should be organized. The ‘departmentalists’ are firm Jacobins and believe in the unity and indivisibility of the Republic, while the ‘regionalists’ are more like the Girondins and believe it necessary to recognize the diversity of France. It is not surprising that geographers such as Jean-François Gravier or historians such as Fernand Braudel should be among the regionalists, while national politicians such as François Mitterrand on the left or Jacques Chirac on the right should favour the department. But the region slowly asserted itself throughout the second half of the 20th century in the form of indirectly elected agencies of regional development, and this slow emergence came to fruition with the creation of elected regional councils by the 1982 decentralization reforms.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
F. Dreyfus and F. D’Arcy, Les Institutions Politiques et Administratives de la Franc ( Paris: Economica, 1985 ).
For a detailed account see: V. Schmidt, Democratizing France: the political and administrative history of decentralization ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990 ).
A. Delcamp, Le Sénat et la Décentralisation ( Paris: Economica, 1991 ), p. 103.
Quoted in P. Deuvet, ‘The Role of the département’, Local Government in France (Paris: La Documentation Française, 2001), a chapter on which the following section draws.
J.P. Worms, ‘Le préfet et ses notables’, Sociologie du Travail no. 3, juillet-août 1966, pp. 249–275.
J.-J. Dayries and M. Dayries, La Régionalisation 3rd edition (Paris: PUF, 1978) mention that there were 44 reports or bills tabled along these lines during the Third Republic.
For a good history of this movement, see M. Nicolas, Emsav: Histoire du mouvement breton ( Paris, Syros, 1982 ).
See J. Loughlin, ‘Regionalism and Ethnic Nationalism in France’, in Yves Mény and Vincent Wright (eds), Centre-periphery relations in Western Europe ( London: Allen & Unwin, 1985 );
J. Loughlin, Regionalism and Ethnic Nationalism in France: a Case-study of Corsica ( Florence: European University Institute, 1989 ).
See J. Loughlin, Regionalism and Ethnic Nationalism in France: a Case-study of Corsica ( Florence: European University Institute, 1989 )
J. Loughlin and E. BernabéuCasanova, Le Nationalisme Corse: Genèse, succès et échec ( Paris: L’Harmattan, 1997 ).
Jean-François Gravier, Paris et le désert français ( Paris, Le Portulan, 1947 ).
There are numerous studies on this movement. A classical study is J. E. S. Hayward, ‘From functional regionalism to functional representation in France’, Political Studies, vol. XVII, March 1969, pp. 48–75.
See also Michel Nicolas, Emsav: Histoire du mouvement breton ( Paris, Syros, 1982 ).
See L. Cohen-Solal, C. Bunodière, Les nouveaux socialistes (Paris: 1977 ).
On the attitudes of the French left to the regional problem, see Yves Mény, Centralisation et décentralisation dans le débat politique français ( 1945–1969 ) ( Paris: Librairie Générale de Droit et de Jurisprudence, 1974 );
M. Phlipponeau, ‘La gauche et le régionalisme (1945–1974)’, in Gras et Livet (eds.), Régions et régionalisme en France (du XVIIIe siècle jusqu’à nos jours) ( Paris: PUF, 1977 ), pp. 529–543;
M. Rocard, ‘La région, une idée neuve pour la Gauche’, and P. Sadran, ‘Les socialistes et la région’, both in Pouvoirs, no. 19 (1981), pp. 131–147; for the attitude of the PCF see L’Humanité, 12/6/1976.
The issue arose when Pierre Joxe, then Minister of the Interior, reformed the Corsican Statut Particulier in 1991, with a parliamentary bill that included a reference to ‘le people corse’. See H. Hintjens, J. Loughlin and C. Olivesi, ‘The Status of Overseas France and Corsica’, in J. Loughlin and S. Mazey (eds), The End of the French Unitary State? Ten Years of Regionalization in France ( London: Frank Cass Ltd., 1995 ).
See Jacques Rodin, Le sacre des notables, Fayard, 1985. See also Yves Mény, ‘La décentralisation’, in Administration 82 (Institut International d’Administration Publique), Paris, 1983, pp. 13–57
Yves Mény and by the same author, ‘Decentralization in Socialist France’, West European Politics, Vol. 7, no. 1, 1984, pp. 65–79.
See M. Keating, J. Loughlin and K. Deschouwer, Culture, Institutions and Regional Development: a Study of Eight European Regions (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar), 2003, chapter 5, ‘Brittany and Languedoc-Roussillon.’
The result was: 51 per cent voted NO; 49 per cent voted YES! On the background to the referendum see J. Loughlin and C. Olivesi (eds), Autonomies Insulaires: vers une politique de différence pour la Corse ( Ajaccio: Albiana, 1999 )
H. Hintjens, J. Loughlin and C. Olivesi), ‘The Status of Overseas France and Corsica’ in J. Loughlin and S. Mazey, The End of the French Unitary State? Ten Years of Regionalization in France ( London: Frank Cass Ltd., 1995 ).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2007 John Loughlin
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Loughlin, J. (2007). The ‘Meso’ Level: The Region vs. the Département. In: Subnational Government. French Politics, Society and Culture Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230210622_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230210622_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-43244-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-21062-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)