Abstract
Some historians have claimed that aside from humanitarian benefits, anaesthesia did not affect surgery in any significant way until surgeons had gained control over the problem of infection through antisepsis techniques in the 1870s. Greene, for example, compared the types of operations performed between 1846 and the 1870s and concluded that anaesthesia had ‘little immediate effect’ on the development of surgery.1 It is certainly true that the use of ether and chloroform did not remove the risk of post-operative wound infection, and surgical mortality remained relatively unchanged until the 1870s. But, as this chapter will show, by providing a solution to the problem of surgical pain, anaesthesia changed surgical thinking and practice, and revolutionised patient attitudes to operations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See for example Henry Potter, ‘Cautions in the administration of chloroform’, L II (1858) 32–4 and letter L II (1858) 289.
Copyright information
© 2006 Stephanie J. Snow
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Snow, S.J. (2006). Anaesthesia in London: John Snow’s Casebooks. In: Operations Without Pain. Science, Technology and Medicine in Modern History. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230209497_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230209497_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-51718-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-20949-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)