Advertisement

Writing to the Defence of Empire: Winston Churchill’s Press Campaign against Constitutional Reform in India, 1929–1935

  • Ian St John
Part of the Palgrave Studies in the History of the Media book series (PSHM)

Abstract

It was while touring North America in the autumn of 1929 that Churchill heard of the Viceroy, Lord Irwin’s, declaration that the goal of British policy in India was the granting of self-governing Dominion status within the Empire. Churchill was outraged at what he took to be the hoisting of the white flag of surrender in India. He was not alone. On 1 November, the day after Irwin’s announcement, the Daily Mail attacked the Conservative leader, Stanley Baldwin, for his willingness to endorse the initiative without consulting his Cabinet colleagues. In the Commons later that day Baldwin responded to the Mail’s allegation, declaring that ‘every statement of fact and every implication of fact contained in that article is untrue, and in my opinion gravely injurious to the public interest, not only in this country, but throughout the Empire’.1 But the Mail was not to be deflected and, on 16 November, carried an article by Churchill in which he denounced Irwin’s declaration as ‘criminally mischievous’. Dominion status could not be accorded to a nation in which 60 million persons were ‘untouchables’, the political class represented only a tiny fraction of the population, and racial and religious antagonisms meant that ‘the withdrawal of British protection would mean the immediate resumption of mediaeval wars’.

Keywords

Conservative Party Indian Policy Daily Mail Mass Circulation British Politics 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Quoted in K. Middlemas and J. Barnes, Baldwin: A Biography (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1969), p. 541.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Quoted in J. Charmley, Churchill: the End of Glory (London: BCA, 1993), p. 258.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    A. Clark, The Tories: The Conservatives and the Nation State 1922–1997 (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1998); Middlemas and Barnes, Baldwin, p. 580.Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    C. Bridge, Holding India to the Empire: The British Conservative Party and the 1935 Constitution (London: Oriental University Press, 1986), p. 61.Google Scholar
  5. 22.
    K. Young, Churchill and Beaverbrook: A Study in Friendship and Politics (London: Eyre and Spottiswoode, 1966), p. 94.Google Scholar
  6. 23.
    For this, see P. Anderson, ‘Patriotism under Pressure: Lord Rothermere and British Foreign Policy’, in G. Peele and C. Cook (eds), The Politics of Reappraisal 1918–1939 (London: Macmillan, 1975).Google Scholar
  7. 40.
    A. Chisholm and M. Davie, Lord Beaverbrook: A Life (New York: Alfred Knopf, 1993), p. 292.Google Scholar
  8. 41.
    S. Koss, The Rise and Fall of the Political Press in Britain (London: Fontana Press, 1990 edition), p. 905.Google Scholar
  9. 42.
    Quoted in A. J. P. Taylor, Beaverbrook (London: Hamish Hamilton, 1972), p. 337.Google Scholar
  10. 53.
    C. Kaul, Reporting the Raj: The British Press and India 1880–1922 (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
  11. 58.
    Earl Halifax, Fulness of Days (Collins, London, 1957), p. 123.Google Scholar
  12. 71.
    C. Coote, Editorial: The Memoirs of Colin Coote (London: Eyre and Spottiswode, 1965), p. 162.Google Scholar
  13. 75.
    D. Ayerst, Garvin of the Observer (London: Croom Helm, 1985), p. 223.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Ian St John 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ian St John

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations