Skip to main content

Ernest Jones’ Mutiny: The People’s Paper, English Popular Politics and the Indian Rebellion 1857–58

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in the History of the Media ((PSHM))

Abstract

The Indian Mutiny of 1857–581 was relayed to the British parliament, press and people through a modernising communications network that brought Indian affairs to the imperial metropole more rapidly than ever before. This network, and the information that flowed through it, was constituted by a mixture of public and private investment, expertise and knowledge. The imperial governing authorities had developed the newly instituted Indian telegraph system, enabling the very latest information to be transmitted to Britain in a matter of hours, whilst private shipping companies had developed an ‘overland’ route that enabled mails carrying private correspondence and official documents to reach Britain in little more than a month, information that fleshed out the skeletal details provided via the wires. Although the means of transmitting news from India was either recently implemented or improved, much of the material constituting it thus remained of a largely similar character to the period preceding these innovations.2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. D. Peers and D. Finkelstein, ‘“A Great System of Circulation”: Introducing India to the Nineteenth Century Media’, in D. Peers and D. Finkelstein (eds.), Negotiating India in the Nineteenth Century Media, (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 2000), p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. Dawson, Soldier Heroes: British Adventure, Empire and the Imagining of Masculinities (London: Routledge, 1994), pp. 86–8.

    Google Scholar 

  3. K. T. Hoppen, The Mid-Victorian Generation 1846–1886 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998), pp. 167–94.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See E. Palmegiano, ‘The Indian Mutiny and the Mid-Victorian Press’, Journal of Newspaper and Periodical History, 7 (London, 1991): 3–11; L. Peters, ‘“Double-dyed Traitors and Infernal Villains”: Illustrated London News, Household Words, Charles Dickens and the Indian Rebellion’, in Peers and Finkelstein (eds.), Negotiating India, pp. 110–34.

    Google Scholar 

  5. T. R. Metcalf, The Aftermath of Revolt: India, 1857–1870 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1965), pp. 72–3.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Finn, After Chartism: Nation and Class in English Radical Politics, 1848–1874 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), pp. 137–41.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Christopher Hill, ‘The Norman Yoke’, in his Puritans and Revolutionaries: Studies in Interpretation of the English Revolution of the Seventeenth Century (London: Panther, 1968), pp. 58–125.

    Google Scholar 

  8. B. Porter, The Refugee Question in Mid-Victorian Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Taylor, Ernest Jones, Chartism, and the Romance of Politics 1819–69 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003), pp. 181–3.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Peter Mandler has recently identified a reckless analysis of texts without careful consideration of their reception, or ‘throw’, as a major ‘problem’ with what has been termed ‘the New Cultural History’. P. Mandler, ‘The Problem with Cultural History’, Cultural and Social History, 1 (London: Arnold, 2004), pp. 94–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Beetham, ‘Towards a Theory of the Periodical as a Publishing Genre’, and A. Humphreys, ‘Popular Narrative and Political Discourse in Reynolds Weekly Newspaper’, both in L. Brake, A. Jones and L. Madden (eds.), Investigating Victorian Journalism (London: Macmillan, 1990), pp. 19–32 and pp. 33–47.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Andrew Barry, ‘Lines of Communication and Spaces of Rule’, in Andrew Barry, Thomas Osborne and Nikolas Rose (eds.), Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-Liberalism and Rationalities of Government (London: UCL Press, 1996), p. 131.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Belchem and J. Epstein, ‘The Nineteeenth-Century Gentleman Leader Revisited’, Social History, 22 (London: Routledge, 1997): 174–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2006 Tim Pratt

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pratt, T. (2006). Ernest Jones’ Mutiny: The People’s Paper, English Popular Politics and the Indian Rebellion 1857–58. In: Kaul, C. (eds) Media and the British Empire. Palgrave Studies in the History of the Media. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230205147_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230205147_6

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-52522-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-230-20514-7

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics