Abstract
The study of the gendered aspects of intellectual history does not enjoy the dubious blessing of being a distinct and well-developed discipline, or even sub-discipline. Perhaps this is as it should be: there are so many aspects of intellectual history which demand gendered attention that it would be unhelpful and reductive to try to unify the field. The range of the work currently being done which might in some way be categorised as gendered intellectual history, or the intellectual history of gender, is staggering. Yet I think there is something to gain here from considering some issues in this range of work under one heading; and this chapter may also point up the fact that, even within this great range of work, there are areas where there is still much to be done.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
G. Lloyd, ‘Feminism in History of Philosophy: appropriating the past’, in M. Fricker and J. Hornsby, eds, The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy (Cambridge, 2000).
G. Lloyd, ‘Introduction’ in G. Lloyd, ed., Feminism and History of Philosophy (Oxford, 2002).
C. Witt, ‘Feminist History of Philosophy’ in E. Zalta, ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2000 edition).
T. Laqueur, Making Sex: body and gender from the Greeks to Freud (Cambridge, Mass., and London, 1990).
D. Riley, ‘Does Sex have a History?’ in J. W. Scott, ed., Feminism and History (Oxford, 1996).
P. Allen, The Concept of Woman (Grand Rapids, Mich., 1997–2002, 2 Vols, 2nd edn).
N. Tuana, The Less Noble Sex: scientific, religious, and philosophical conceptions of woman’s nature (Bloomington and Indianapolis, Ind., 1993).
M. Sommerville, Sex and Subjection: attitudes to women in early-modern society (London, 1995).
A. Shepard, Meanings of Manhood in Early Modern England (Oxford, 2003).
G. Lloyd, ‘Maleness, Metaphor, and the “Crisis” of Reason’ in L. M. Antony and C. Witt, eds, A Mind of One’s Own: feminist essays on reason and objectivity (Boulder, Colo., and Oxford, 1993).
S. Lovibond, ‘An Ancient Theory of Gender: Plato and the Pythagorean Table’ in L. Archer, S. Fischler and M. Wyke, eds, Women in Ancient Societies (London, 1994), pp. 88–101.
G. Lloyd, The Man of Reason: ‘male’ and ‘female’ in Western philosophy (London, 1984), p. 3.
C. Witt, ‘Form, Normativity and Gender in Aristotle: a feminist perspective’ in C. Freeland, ed., Feminist Interpretations of Aristotle (Pennsylvania, 1998).
G. Lloyd, The Man of Reason: ‘male’ and ‘female’ in Western philosophy (London, 1984; 2nd edn with new introduction: Routledge, 1993).
John Knox, First Blast of the Trumpet against the Monstrous Regiment of Women (Geneva, 1558).
Jean Bodin, Six Bookes of a Commonweale, ed. K. McRae (Cambridge, Mass., 1962), pp. 746–7.
M. Nyquist, ‘Profuse, Proud Cleopatra: “barbarism” and female rule in early modern English republicanism’, Women’s Studies 24 (1994), 85–130.
M. L. Shanley, ‘Marriage Contract and Social Contract in Seventeenth Century English Political Thought’, Western Political Quarterly 32 (1979), 79–91.
S. M. Okin, Women in Western Political Thought (London, 1980; orig. Princeton, NJ, 1979).
D. H. Coole, Women in Political Theory: from ancient misogyny to contemporary feminism (Brighton, 1988).
A. W. Saxonhouse, Women in the History of Political Thought: ancient Greece to Machiavelli (New York, 1985), respectively.
K. Green, The Woman of Reason: feminism, humanism and political thought (Cambridge, 1995).
N. J. Hirschmann and C. Di Stefano, eds, Revisioning the Political: feminist reconstructions of traditional concepts in western political theory (Colorado and Oxford, 1996).
C. Pateman, The Sexual Contract (Cambridge, 1988).
H. F. Pitkin, Fortune is a Woman: gender and politics in the thought of Niccolò Machiavelli (Berkeley, Los Angeles, Calif., and London, 1984).
M. S. Kochin, Gender and Rhetoric in Plato’s Political Thought (Cambridge, 2002).
A. Hobbs, Plato and the Hero: courage, manliness, and the impersonal good (Cambridge, 2000).
W. R. Newell, Ruling Passion: the erotics of statecraft in Platonic political philosophy (Maryland and Oxford, 2000).
M. Buchan’s more pedestrian Women in Plato’s Political Theory (Basingstoke and London, 1999).
P. Springborg, ‘Astell, Masham, and Locke: religion and politics’ in H. Smith, ed., Women Writers and the Early Modern British Political Tradition (Cambridge, 1998).
L. Hunt, The Family Romance of the French Revolution (London, 1992).
R. Weil, Political Passions: gender, the family and political argument in England 1680–1714 (Manchester and New York, 1999).
S. Wiseman, ‘“Adam, the Father of all Flesh”: porno-political rhetoric and political theory in and after the English Civil War’, in J. Holstun, ed., Pamphlet Wars: prose in the English revolution (London, 1992).
C. Jordan, Renaissance Feminism: literary texts and political models (Ithaca, NY, and London, 1990).
H. Smith, Reason’s Disciples: seventeenth-century English feminists (Urbana, Ill., and London, 1982).
P. Deutscher, Yielding Gender: feminism, deconstruction and the history of philosophy (London, 1997), citing pp. 91, 1.
J. Ober, Political Dissent in Democratic Athens: intellectual critics of popular rule (Princeton, NJ, 1998).
Psuedo-Xenophon, Constitution of the Athenians, II.20 (ed. and trans. H. Frisch, The Constitution of the Athenians: a philological-historical analysis (Copenhagen, 1942)).
Cicero, De Re Publica 1.67.2 (ed. J. Zetzel, Cambridge, 1995).
Francesco Guicciardini, How the Popular Government should be Reformed (1512), in J. Kraye, ed., Cambridge Translations of Renaissance Philosophical Texts: Vol. 2: Political philosophy (Cambridge, 1997), p. 231.
John Milton, The Tenure of Kings and Magistrates, in Milton, Political Writings, ed. M. Dzelzainis (Cambridge, 1991), p. 3.
John Milton, Readie and Easie Way (1st edn), Complete Prose Works of John Milton, revised edn, Vol. 7, ed. J. Ayers (New Haven, Conn., and London, 1980), p. 359.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2006 Rachel Foxley
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Foxley, R. (2006). gender and intellectual history. In: Whatmore, R., Young, B. (eds) palgrave advances in intellectual history. Palgrave Advances. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230204300_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230204300_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4039-3901-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-20430-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)