Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Palgrave Advances ((PAD))

Abstract

The study of the gendered aspects of intellectual history does not enjoy the dubious blessing of being a distinct and well-developed discipline, or even sub-discipline. Perhaps this is as it should be: there are so many aspects of intellectual history which demand gendered attention that it would be unhelpful and reductive to try to unify the field. The range of the work currently being done which might in some way be categorised as gendered intellectual history, or the intellectual history of gender, is staggering. Yet I think there is something to gain here from considering some issues in this range of work under one heading; and this chapter may also point up the fact that, even within this great range of work, there are areas where there is still much to be done.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. G. Lloyd, ‘Feminism in History of Philosophy: appropriating the past’, in M. Fricker and J. Hornsby, eds, The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy (Cambridge, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. Lloyd, ‘Introduction’ in G. Lloyd, ed., Feminism and History of Philosophy (Oxford, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. Witt, ‘Feminist History of Philosophy’ in E. Zalta, ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2000 edition).

    Google Scholar 

  4. T. Laqueur, Making Sex: body and gender from the Greeks to Freud (Cambridge, Mass., and London, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. Riley, ‘Does Sex have a History?’ in J. W. Scott, ed., Feminism and History (Oxford, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. Allen, The Concept of Woman (Grand Rapids, Mich., 1997–2002, 2 Vols, 2nd edn).

    Google Scholar 

  7. N. Tuana, The Less Noble Sex: scientific, religious, and philosophical conceptions of woman’s nature (Bloomington and Indianapolis, Ind., 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Sommerville, Sex and Subjection: attitudes to women in early-modern society (London, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Shepard, Meanings of Manhood in Early Modern England (Oxford, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. Lloyd, ‘Maleness, Metaphor, and the “Crisis” of Reason’ in L. M. Antony and C. Witt, eds, A Mind of One’s Own: feminist essays on reason and objectivity (Boulder, Colo., and Oxford, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. Lovibond, ‘An Ancient Theory of Gender: Plato and the Pythagorean Table’ in L. Archer, S. Fischler and M. Wyke, eds, Women in Ancient Societies (London, 1994), pp. 88–101.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. G. Lloyd, The Man of Reason: ‘male’ and ‘female’ in Western philosophy (London, 1984), p. 3.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. C. Witt, ‘Form, Normativity and Gender in Aristotle: a feminist perspective’ in C. Freeland, ed., Feminist Interpretations of Aristotle (Pennsylvania, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  14. G. Lloyd, The Man of Reason: ‘male’ and ‘female’ in Western philosophy (London, 1984; 2nd edn with new introduction: Routledge, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  15. John Knox, First Blast of the Trumpet against the Monstrous Regiment of Women (Geneva, 1558).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jean Bodin, Six Bookes of a Commonweale, ed. K. McRae (Cambridge, Mass., 1962), pp. 746–7.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. M. Nyquist, ‘Profuse, Proud Cleopatra: “barbarism” and female rule in early modern English republicanism’, Women’s Studies 24 (1994), 85–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. M. L. Shanley, ‘Marriage Contract and Social Contract in Seventeenth Century English Political Thought’, Western Political Quarterly 32 (1979), 79–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. S. M. Okin, Women in Western Political Thought (London, 1980; orig. Princeton, NJ, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  20. D. H. Coole, Women in Political Theory: from ancient misogyny to contemporary feminism (Brighton, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  21. A. W. Saxonhouse, Women in the History of Political Thought: ancient Greece to Machiavelli (New York, 1985), respectively.

    Google Scholar 

  22. K. Green, The Woman of Reason: feminism, humanism and political thought (Cambridge, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  23. N. J. Hirschmann and C. Di Stefano, eds, Revisioning the Political: feminist reconstructions of traditional concepts in western political theory (Colorado and Oxford, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  24. C. Pateman, The Sexual Contract (Cambridge, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  25. H. F. Pitkin, Fortune is a Woman: gender and politics in the thought of Niccolò Machiavelli (Berkeley, Los Angeles, Calif., and London, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  26. M. S. Kochin, Gender and Rhetoric in Plato’s Political Thought (Cambridge, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  27. A. Hobbs, Plato and the Hero: courage, manliness, and the impersonal good (Cambridge, 2000).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. W. R. Newell, Ruling Passion: the erotics of statecraft in Platonic political philosophy (Maryland and Oxford, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  29. M. Buchan’s more pedestrian Women in Plato’s Political Theory (Basingstoke and London, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  30. P. Springborg, ‘Astell, Masham, and Locke: religion and politics’ in H. Smith, ed., Women Writers and the Early Modern British Political Tradition (Cambridge, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  31. L. Hunt, The Family Romance of the French Revolution (London, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  32. R. Weil, Political Passions: gender, the family and political argument in England 1680–1714 (Manchester and New York, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  33. S. Wiseman, ‘“Adam, the Father of all Flesh”: porno-political rhetoric and political theory in and after the English Civil War’, in J. Holstun, ed., Pamphlet Wars: prose in the English revolution (London, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  34. C. Jordan, Renaissance Feminism: literary texts and political models (Ithaca, NY, and London, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  35. H. Smith, Reason’s Disciples: seventeenth-century English feminists (Urbana, Ill., and London, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  36. P. Deutscher, Yielding Gender: feminism, deconstruction and the history of philosophy (London, 1997), citing pp. 91, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  37. J. Ober, Political Dissent in Democratic Athens: intellectual critics of popular rule (Princeton, NJ, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Psuedo-Xenophon, Constitution of the Athenians, II.20 (ed. and trans. H. Frisch, The Constitution of the Athenians: a philological-historical analysis (Copenhagen, 1942)).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Cicero, De Re Publica 1.67.2 (ed. J. Zetzel, Cambridge, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Francesco Guicciardini, How the Popular Government should be Reformed (1512), in J. Kraye, ed., Cambridge Translations of Renaissance Philosophical Texts: Vol. 2: Political philosophy (Cambridge, 1997), p. 231.

    Google Scholar 

  41. John Milton, The Tenure of Kings and Magistrates, in Milton, Political Writings, ed. M. Dzelzainis (Cambridge, 1991), p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  42. John Milton, Readie and Easie Way (1st edn), Complete Prose Works of John Milton, revised edn, Vol. 7, ed. J. Ayers (New Haven, Conn., and London, 1980), p. 359.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2006 Rachel Foxley

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Foxley, R. (2006). gender and intellectual history. In: Whatmore, R., Young, B. (eds) palgrave advances in intellectual history. Palgrave Advances. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230204300_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230204300_11

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4039-3901-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-230-20430-0

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics