Advertisement

Social Change and the Potential for Flexibility in Islamic Law: the Shari’a between Ethics and Politicisation

  • Bassam Tibi

Abstract

In most religions, religious scholars are basically theologians. In contrast, learned men of religion in Islam are sacral jurists/faqihs (in Arabic: fuqaha), not theologians (mutakallimun). In medieval Islam a religious tradition of kalam (theology) was unfolded, but it never succeeded in becoming mainstream. The fiqh (Islamic sacral jurisprudence) possessed and continues to possess a monopoly over the interpretation of religious affairs in Islam. Despite the central place of law in Islam, I refer to the text of the Koran in which the term shari’a occurs only once (sura 45, verse 18) with an ethical, not a juridical meaning. Historically, I maintain that the shari’a, as a legal system, is a postKoranic construction. In the course of Islamic history, the shari’a became an integral part of the everyday culture of Muslims, but not yet politicised. Of course, there are some exceptional cases. It is, therefore, basic to refer to the shari’a to understand why most Muslims perceive their religious beliefs in terms of legal instructions. A pious Muslim is thus a lawful person.

Keywords

Legal Norm Legal Tradition World Peace Islamic Civilisation Islamic Ethic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    H.L.A. Hart, The Concept of Law, 2nd printing, Oxford, 1970, p. 221. See also on international lawGoogle Scholar
  2. H.L.A. Hart and Michael Akehurst, A Modern Introduction to International Law, 6th edition, London, 1987, pp. 21f. See also the classic, fortunately reprinted, work byGoogle Scholar
  3. F.S.C. Northrop, The Taming of the Nations: a Study of the Cultural Basis of International Policy, 2nd edition, Woodbridge, CT, 1987. The basic issues of international law are discussed byGoogle Scholar
  4. Terry Nardin, Law, Morality and the Relations of States, Princeton, NJ, 1983.Google Scholar
  5. 2.
    Ralf Dreier, Recht — Moral — Ideologie. Studien zur Rechtstheorie, Frankfurt/M., 1981, p. 24.Google Scholar
  6. 3.
    Abdullah An-Na’im, Toward an Islamic Reformation, Syracuse, NY, 1990. See also Google Scholar
  7. Tore Lindholm and Kari Vogt (eds), Islamic Law Reform and Human Rights, Copenhagen and Oslo, 1993.Google Scholar
  8. 4.
    On the European expansion, see B. Tibi, Kreuzzug und Djihad. Der Islam und die christliche Welt, Munich, 1999, chapter 6; see also Google Scholar
  9. Barrie Axford, The Global System: Economics, Politics and Culture, New York, 1995.Google Scholar
  10. 5.
    An-Na’im, Toward an Islamic Reformation (referenced in note 3), chapters 6 and 7; see also B. Tibi, ‘Islamic Law/Shari’a, Human Rights, Universal Morality and International Relations’, in Human Rights Quarterly, vol. 16, 2 (1994), pp. 277–99.Google Scholar
  11. 6.
    See Brun-Otto Bryde, The Politics and Sociology of African Legal Development, Frankfurt/M., 1976; as well as my review in Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, vol. 65 (1979), pp. 433f. Bryde was promoted in 2000 to judge at the German Federal Supreme Court.Google Scholar
  12. 7.
    See also J.N.D. Anderson, Islamic Law in Africa, 3rd printing, London, 1978.Google Scholar
  13. 8.
    Theodor Viehweg, Topik und Jurisprudenz. Ein Beitrag zur rechtswissenschaftlichen Grundlagenforschung, 5th printing, Munich, 1974, p. 118.Google Scholar
  14. 9.
    For an authentic account, see Subhi Salih, Ma’alim al-shari’a al-Islamiyya (Essential Characteristics of Islamic Law), Beirut, 1975, pp. 122ff. See also Google Scholar
  15. Yusuf al-Qaradawi, al-Halal wa al-haram fi al-Islam (The Permitted and the Forbidden in Islam), 20th printing, Cairo, 1991.Google Scholar
  16. 10.
    On the de-Westernisation of law on the example of the shari’a, see B. Tibi, ‘Die Entwestlichung des Rechts. Das Hudud-Strafrecht der islamischen Schari’a’, in Klaus Lüderssen (ed.), Aufgeklärte Kriminalpolitik oder Kampf gegen das Böse, 5 vols, here vol. 5, Baden-Baden, 1998, pp. 21–30.Google Scholar
  17. 11.
    See Najib Armanazi, al-Shar’ al-duwali fi al-Islam (International Law in Islam), new printing, London, 1990 (first published, Damascus, 1930). See also Google Scholar
  18. W.M. Watt, Islamic Political Thought: the Basic Concepts, Edinburgh, 1969, p. 91. See also Google Scholar
  19. B. Tibi, ‘War and Peace in Islam’, in Terry Nardin (ed.), The Ethics of War and Peace: Religious and Secular Perspectives, Princeton, NJ, 1996, pp. 128–45.Google Scholar
  20. 12.
    See the textbook by Werner Levi, Contemporary International Law, 2nd edition, Boulder, CO, 1991.Google Scholar
  21. 14.
    Maxime Rodinson, Mohammed, Lucerne and Frankfurt, 1975, p. 27.Google Scholar
  22. 15.
    See B. Tibi, The Crisis of Modern Islam: a Preindustrial Culture in the Scientific-Technological Age, Salt Lake City, 1988, pp. 57–66.Google Scholar
  23. 16.
    This is also the view of the legal Muslim reformer Mohammed Said al-Ashmawi, Usul al-shari’a (The Origins of the Shari’a), Cairo, 1983.Google Scholar
  24. 17.
    Joseph Schacht, An Introduction to Islamic Law, 5th printing, Oxford, 1979, p. 1.Google Scholar
  25. 18.
    For a detailed account, see the contributions in Nikki Keddie (ed.), Scholars, Saints and Sufis: Muslim Religious Institutions in the Middle East since 1500, Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1972; see in particular the editor’s introduction.Google Scholar
  26. 19.
    On the Koran, see Rudi Paret, Mohammed und der Koran, 4th printing, Stuttgart, 1976; as well as the internationally leading monograph byGoogle Scholar
  27. R. Bell and W.M. Watt, Introduction to the Qur’an, 2nd printing, Edinburgh, 1977. Interesting interpretations of the Koran are given byGoogle Scholar
  28. Johan Bouman, Gott und Mensch im Koran. Eine Strukturform religiöser Anthropologie anhand des Beispiels Allah und Muhammad, Darmstadt, 1977.Google Scholar
  29. 20.
    On the interpretation of revelation in Islam, see W.M. Watt, Islamic Revelation in the Modern World, Edinburgh, 1969.Google Scholar
  30. 21.
    See the introduction to N.J. Coulson, A History of Islamic Law, 3rd printing, Edinburgh, 1978.Google Scholar
  31. 22.
    On the notion of de-Westernisation, see note 10 above, on the crisis of the secular nation-state, see B. Tibi, ‘The Simultaneity of the Unsimultaneous: Old Tribes and Imposed Nation-States in the Modern Middle East’, in Philip Khoury/Joseph Kostiner (eds), Tribes and State Formation in the Middle East, Berkeley, 1990, pp. 127–52.Google Scholar
  32. 23.
    Maxime Rodinson, Islam und Kapitalismus, Frankfurt/M., 1971, p. 77. See also my introduction (‘Maxime Rodinson, der Islam und die westlichen Islam-Studien’) to the 2nd edition of this book (1986), on the work of Rodinson, pp. ix–li.Google Scholar
  33. 24.
    John Waterbury, The Commander of the Faithful: the Moroccan Political Elite, New York, 1970, p. 5.Google Scholar
  34. 25.
    See the interpretation of Islamic law in the article by Ann Elizabeth Mayer, Abdulaziz Sachedina and Norman Caldor in Oxford Encyclopedia of the Middle Eastern World, 4 vols, New York, 1995, vol. 2, pp. 450–72.Google Scholar
  35. 26.
    Salih, Ma’alim (referenced in note 9), pp. 89ff. See also chapter 6 on Arabiyya in: B. Tibi, Islam and the Cultural Accommodation of Social Change, Boulder, CO, 1990, pp. 76–101.Google Scholar
  36. 27.
    Ann E. Mayer, ‘Law and Religion in the Muslim Middle East’, in The American Journal of Comparative Law, vol. 35, 1 (Winter 1987), pp. 127–84.Google Scholar
  37. 28.
    On this distinction, see the introduction in Donald E. Smith (ed.), Religion and Political Modernization, New Haven and London, 1974.Google Scholar
  38. 30.
    Muhammed T. Ben-Ashur, Maqasid al-shari’a al-Islamiyya (The Aims of Islamic Law), Tunis, 1978, p. 64.Google Scholar
  39. 32.
    See W.M. Watt, Muhammad at Medina, 6th printing, Oxford, 1977.Google Scholar
  40. 33.
    Marshall G.S. Hodgson, The Venture of Islam, 3 vols, Chicago, 1974. See also Tibi, Kreuzzug (referenced in note 4).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 34.
    Sabir Tu’aima, al-Shari’a al-Islamiyya fi asr al-ilm (Islamic Law in the Age of Science), Beirut, 1979, pp. 208ff.Google Scholar
  42. 37.
    Jack Donnelly, Universal Human Rights, Ithaca and London, 1989.Google Scholar
  43. 38.
    See B. Tibi, ‘International Morality and Cross-Cultural Bridging’, in Roman Herzog, Preventing the Clash of Civilizations, New York, 1999, pp. 107–26; see also Google Scholar
  44. M.K. Asante and W.B. Gudykunst (eds), Handbook of International and Inter-Cultural Communication, London, 1989.Google Scholar
  45. 39.
    Mohammed Arkoun, Rethinking Islam, Boulder, CO, 1994.Google Scholar
  46. 40.
    W.M. Watt, Islamic Philosophy and Theology, 5th printing, Edinburgh, 1979, pp. 37ff. and 91ff.Google Scholar
  47. 41.
    On medieval Islamic rationalisation, see Herbert Davidson, Alfarabi, Avicenna, Averroës on Intellect, New York, 1992; andGoogle Scholar
  48. B. Tibi, Der wahre Imam. Der Islam von Mohammed bis zur Gegenwart, Munich, 1996, Part 2.Google Scholar
  49. 42.
    Ernst Bloch, Avicenna und die Aristotelische Linke, Frankfurt/M., 1963, p. 45.Google Scholar
  50. 43.
    M. Wahba, ‘The Paradox of Averroës’, in Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, vol. 66 (1980), pp. 257–60.Google Scholar
  51. 44.
    B. Tibi, ‘Islam and Secularization, Religion and the Functional Differentiation of the Social System’, in Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, vol. 66 (1980), pp. 207–22.Google Scholar
  52. 45.
    Niklas Luhmann, Funktion der Religion, Frankfurt/M., 1977.Google Scholar
  53. 46.
    See B. Tibi, ‘Secularisation and Desecularisation in Modern Islam’, in Religion, Staat, Gesellschaft, vol. 1, 1 (2000), pp. 95–117.Google Scholar
  54. 47.
    Josef Esser, Vorverständnis und Methodenwahl in der Rechtsfindung, Frankfurt/M., 1970, p. 32.Google Scholar
  55. 51.
    See Charles C. Adams, Islam and Modernism in Egypt: a Study of the Modern Reform Movement, 2nd printing, London, 1968 (first published in 1933).Google Scholar
  56. 52.
    See Norman Anderson, Law Reform in the Muslim World, London, 1976.Google Scholar
  57. 59.
    See B. Tibi, ‘Islam and Social Change in the Modern Middle East’, in Law and State, vol. 22 (1980), pp. 91–106.Google Scholar
  58. 60.
    Ali Abdelraziq, al-Islam wa usul al-hukm (Islam and Patterns of Government), Cairo, 1925 (reprinted Beirut, 1966), French translation in: Revue des Etudes Islamiques, vol. 7 (1933) and vol. 8 (1934). On Abdelraziq, see Google Scholar
  59. B. Tibi, Arab Nationalism: between Islam and the Nation-State, 3rd edition, New York, 1997, pp. 170ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 61.
    On the use of takfir, see Sayyid Yasin, al-Kauniyya, wa al-usuliyya wa ma-ba’d al-hadatha (Globalism, Fundamentalism and Postmodernism), Cairo, 1996, chapter 21, pp. 228ff. On the radical groups and their ideology, see Google Scholar
  61. Abdulazim Ramadan, Jama’at al-takfir (The Takfir-Groups), Cairo, 1995.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Malcolm Kerr, Islamic Reform: the Political and Legal Theories of Muhammad Abduh and Rashid Rida, Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1966.Google Scholar
  63. 68.
    N.J. Coulson, Conflicts and Tensions in Islamic Jurisprudence, Chicago, 1969, p. 2; see also Google Scholar
  64. Coulson, ‘The Concept of Progress and Islamic Law’, in Robert N. Bellah (ed.), Religion and Progress in Modern Asia, New York, 1965, pp. 74–92; as well asGoogle Scholar
  65. N.J. Coulson and Norman Anderson, ‘Modernization: Islamic Law’, in Michael Brett (ed.), Northern Africa: Islam and Modernization, London, 1973, pp. 73–83.Google Scholar
  66. 69.
    More on this in the shari’a — chapter 8 in B. Tibi, The Challenge of Fundamentalism: Political Islam and the New World Disorder, Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1998, pp. 158–78.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bassam Tibi
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.University of GöttingenGermany
  2. 2.Cornell UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations