Skip to main content

Professionalizing Dissent: Protest, Political Communication, and the Media

  • Chapter
The Establishment Responds

Part of the book series: Palgrave Macmillan Transnational History Series ((PMSTH))

  • 724 Accesses

Abstract

Exploring “the overall relationship between protest movements and their interaction in a larger social and cultural context” necessitates paying some attention to the communicative strategies of such movements. It is, after all, through these strategies that protesters seek to persuade and mobilize supporters. Communicative strategies are furthermore the means through which movements confront “the embodiment of things to overcome and the major target of criticism,” namely, the “establishment.”1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Joachim Scharloth, Kathrin Fahlenbrach, and Martin Klimke, “Introduction,” presented at the conference “The ‘Establishment’ Responds: The Institutional and Social Impact of Protest Movements during and after the Cold War,” Heidelberg, Germany, November 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ralph Negrine and Darren Lilleker, “The Professionalization of Political Communication: Continuities and Change in Media Practices,” European Journal of Communication 17 (2002): 305–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Graham Murdock, “Political Deviance: The Press Presentation of a Militant Mass Demonstration,” in Stanley Cohen and Jock Young, eds, The Manufacture of News: Deviance, Social Problems and the Mass Media (London: Constable, 1979), 173.

    Google Scholar 

  4. For a fuller discussion, see Ralph Negrine, Politics and the Mass Media in Britain (London: Routledge, 1989).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Des Wilson, Pressure: The A to Z of Campaigning in Britain (London: Ashgate, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chris Rose, How to Win Campaigns: 101 Steps to Success (London: Earthscan, 2005). See also http://www.campaignstrategy.org.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wilma De Jong, Martin Shaw, and Neil Stammers, eds, Global Activism, Global Media (London: Pluto Press, 2005), 7.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brian McNair, “PR Must Die: Spin, Anti-spin and Political Public Relations in the UK, 1997–2004,” Journalism Studies 5(3) (2004): 325–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pippa Norris, Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing Political Activism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), 9–10.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See Brian Doherty, Matthew Paterson, Alexandra Plows, and Derek Wall, “Explaining the Fuel Protests,” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 5 (2003): 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lance W. Bennett, “Communicating Global Activism: Strengths and Vulnerabilities of Networked Politics,” Information, Communication & Society 6 (2003): 143–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jenny Pickerill and Frank Webster, “The Anti-War/Peace Movement in Britain and the Conditions of Information War,” International Relations 20 (2006): 407–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. See also selected chapters in Frank Webster, ed., Culture and Politics in the Information Age: A New Politics? (London: Routledge, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. G. Jordan and William Maloney, The Protest Business (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1997), 22.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sean Carrell, “Plan to Link Up with BSkyB Splits Friends of the Earth,” The Guardian, August6, 2007. http://www.guardian.co.ukenvironment/2007/aug/06/conservation. broadcasting.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Camp for Climate Action. Background to the Camp Mainstream Media Access Policy (August 13, 2007): http://www.climatecamp.org.uk.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Katherine Q. Seelye, New York Times, “About $2.6 Billion Spent on Political Ads in 2008,” December 2, 2008: http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com2008/12/02/about-26-billion-spent-on-political-ads-in-2008/ (accessed June 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. Keane, The Life and Death of Democracy (London: Simon and Schuster, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Kathrin Fahlenbrach Martin Klimke Joachim Scharloth Laura Wong

Copyright information

© 2012 Kathrin Fahlenbrach, Martin Klimke, Joachim Scharloth, and Laura Wong

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Negrine, R. (2012). Professionalizing Dissent: Protest, Political Communication, and the Media. In: Fahlenbrach, K., Klimke, M., Scharloth, J., Wong, L. (eds) The Establishment Responds. Palgrave Macmillan Transnational History Series. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230119833_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230119833_3

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-230-11499-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-230-11983-3

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics