Skip to main content

The Control Arms Campaign: A Case Study of NGO Impacts on International Relations after the Cold War

  • Chapter
  • 691 Accesses

Part of the book series: Palgrave Macmillan Transnational History Series ((PMSTH))

Abstract

Research in the field of international agreements on small arms and light weapons (hereafter SALW) has focused mainly on specific aspects of the problem viewed from an international relations perspective, whereas the social movement dimension of the topic has been largely under-researched. Moreover, this research has been almost exclusively done by insiders, either activists or academics, closely connected to the NGO sector. As a result, this perspective may be biased toward overemphasizing the NGO role in these processes. In addition, the majority of these works do not cover more recent events.1 This essay expands und updates previous analyses, taking into account the events of 2006, while also contributing original empirical research from an outside perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See, e.g., Denise García, “Norm Building in the Evolution of the Control of Small Arms in the International Agenda,” Security and Defense Studies Review 5, no. 2 (Autumn 2005): 225–255.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Small Arms Survey, Yearbook 2003: Development Denied (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003), chapter 7.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See Richard Price, “Reversing the Gun Sights: Transnational Civil Society Targets Land Mines,” International Organization 52, no. 3 (July 1998): 613–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. See also Javier Alcalde, “The International Campaign to Ban Landmines, the Mine Ban Treaty and Human Security Ten Years Later,” European Political Science 7, no. 4 (December 2008): 519–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Estimated by the UN. See United Nations, “Setting the Record Straight.” http://disarmament.un.org/cab/smallarms/facts.htm (accessed July 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  6. John Borrie and Vanessa Martin Randin, eds, Alternative Approaches in Multilateral Decision Making: Disarmament as Humanitarian Action (Geneva: UNIDIR, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  7. See Small Arms Survey, Yearbook 2002: Counting the Human Cost (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), chapter 5.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ole Elgstrom and Christer Jönsson, eds, European Union Negotiations: Processes, Networks and Institutions (London: Routledge, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  9. See Javier Alcalde and Caroline Bouchard, “Human Security and Coherence within the EU: The Case of Small Arms and Light Weapons,” Hamburg Review on Social Sciences 3, no. 1 (June 2008), Special issue on Revisiting Coherence in the Common Foreign and Security Policy. http://www.hamburg-review.com/fileadmin/pdf/03_01/F_ Alcalde_02.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  10. For the term “scale shift,” see Sidney Tarrow and Doug McAdam, “Scale Shift in Transnational Contention,” in Donatella della Porta and Sidney Tarrow, eds, Transnational Protest and Global Activism (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2005), 121–150.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Ronald M. Behringer, “Middle Power Leadership on the Human Security Agenda,” Cooperation and Conflict 40, no. 3 (2005): 305–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. David A. Snow and Robert D. Benford, “Ideology, Frame Resonance and Participant Mobilization,” International Social Movement Research 1 (1988): 197–219.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kristin A Goss, Disarmed: The Missing Movement for Gun Control in America (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Patrick McCarthy, “Deconstructing Disarmament: The Challenge of Making the Disarmament and Arms Control Machinery Responsive to the Humanitarian Imperative,” in John Borrie and Vanessa Martin Randin, eds, Alternative Approaches in Multilateral Decision Making: Disarmament as Humanitarian Action (Geneva, UNIDIR, 2005), 51–66.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Kathrin Fahlenbrach Martin Klimke Joachim Scharloth Laura Wong

Copyright information

© 2012 Kathrin Fahlenbrach, Martin Klimke, Joachim Scharloth, and Laura Wong

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Alcalde, J. (2012). The Control Arms Campaign: A Case Study of NGO Impacts on International Relations after the Cold War. In: Fahlenbrach, K., Klimke, M., Scharloth, J., Wong, L. (eds) The Establishment Responds. Palgrave Macmillan Transnational History Series. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230119833_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230119833_12

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-230-11499-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-230-11983-3

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics