Abstract
The problem of conflict abstinence in the curriculum was at the center of the debate among scholars who were situated in different progressive political perspectives. These groups of scholars were engaged in powerful analyses that addressed both the dominant and counterdominant perspectives. They were challenging the culture of positivism (Giroux, 1981a), which was fundamentally concerned “with controlling and dominating the natural and human environment” (Wexler, 1976, p. 8), thus fostering cognitive passivity (Kincheloe, 1993). These scholars saw the urgent need, as Wexler (1976) puts it, to “turn from science as the single standard of knowledge in favor of a plurality of equally ways of knowing” (p. 8). Learning, Giroux (1983) claims, “takes place in a variety of public spheres outside of the schools” (p. xxviii).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 2011 João M. Paraskeva
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Paraskeva, J.M. (2011). The Nature of Conflict. In: Conflicts in Curriculum Theory. Education, Politics, and Public Life. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230119628_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230119628_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-29467-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-11962-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Education CollectionEducation (R0)