Skip to main content
  • 295 Accesses

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to identify the most important security and military issues that have surrounded the implementation of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA).1 Since 1979, many former American officials have testified to the Congress or written papers for various think tanks about these controversial security issues. It may be many years before the internal records of the U.S. government are declassified for historians to study these controversies inside the U.S. government. However, in the meantime, by examining the debates among former officials, at least some indirect knowledge of the range of policy options can be glimpsed. To my knowledge, these debates have not been drawn together in one place to provide a guide to security issues and controversies that have surrounded the TRA. This paper does not attempt to explain the origins of these issues or why former officials differ in their views. Retired Admiral Eric McVadon, former defense attaché in Beijing, has testified that how one characterizes China’s military and security influence is often a function of whether one leans toward “China bashing” or “Panda hugging.”2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Rear Admiral Eric A. McVadon, U.S. Navy (Retired), Testimony before the U.S.-China Economic & Security Review Commission, March 4, 2009, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jenny W. Hsu, “U.S. Comfortable With Détente,” Taipei Times, March 19, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  3. This section draws on David Tawei Lee, The Making of the Taiwan Relations Act (Oxford University Press, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kenneth T. Young, Negotiating With the Chinese Communists: The United States Experience, 1953–1967, McGraw-Hill, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Stephen S. F. Chen, “The Foreign and Cross-Strait Policies of the New Administration in the Republic of China,” Chatham House, London, December 8, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  6. David Tawei Lee, The Making of the Taiwan Relations Act, Oxford University Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jaw-Ling Joanne Chang, “Managing U.S. Taiwan Relations: Twenty Years After the Taiwan Relations Act,” United States-Taiwan Relations: Twenty Years after the Taiwan Relations Act, University of Maryland School of Law 2000, edited by Jaw-Ling Joanne Chang and William W. Boyer.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cheng-Yi Lin, “The U.S. Role in Taiwan China Security Relations,” United States-Taiwan Relations: Twenty Years after the Taiwan Relations Act, University of Maryland School of Law 2000, edited by Jaw-Ling Joanne Chang and William W. Boyer.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yann-Huei Song, “The Second Decade of the Taiwan Relations Act: U.S. Congressional Involvement in the Implementation ofthe Law,” United States-Taiwan Relations: Twenty Years after the Taiwan Relations Act, University of Maryland School of Law 2000, edited by Jaw-Ling Joanne Chang and William W. Boyer.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Robert G. Kaiser and Steven Mufson, “Blue Team Draws a Hard Line on Beijing: Action on Hill Reflects Informal Group’s Clout,” Washington Post, February 22, 2000, p. A1.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Robert G. Kaiser and Steven Mufson, “Blue Team Draws a Hard Line on Beijing: Action on Hill Reflects Informal Group’s Clout,” Washington Post, February 22, 2000, p. A1.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Robert G. Kaiser and Steven Mufson, “Blue Team Draws a Hard Line on Beijing: Action on Hill Reflects Informal Group’s Clout,” Washington Post, February 22, 2000, p. A1.

    Google Scholar 

  13. See David Shambaugh, “A Matter of Time: Taiwan’s Eroding Military Advantage,” Washington Quarterly, 23 (Spring 2000), 119–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Thomas E. Ricks, “Taiwan Seen Vulnerable to Attack: Pentagon Study Says Isolation Keeps Defense Weak,” The Washington Post, 31 March 2000, p. Al.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ralph A. Cossa, Brad Glosserman, Michael A. McDevitt, Nirav Patel, James Przystup and Brad Roberts, The United States and the Asia-Pacific Region: Security Strategy for the Obama Administration, 2009, p. 49. Available at www.cnas.org/files/documents/publications/CossaPatel_US_Asia-Pacific_February2009.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Robert Sutter, “Cross-Strait Moderation and the United States—Policy Adjustments Needed,” Pacific Forum CSIS Honolulu, Hawaii, Number 17, March 5, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Robert Sutter, “Cross-Strait Moderation and the United States—Policy Adjustments Needed,” Pacific Forum CSIS Honolulu, Hawaii, Number 17, March 5, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dan Blumenthal and Aaron Friedberg, An American Strategy For Asia—A Report Of The Asia Strategy Working Group, AEI, January 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Michael O’Hanlon, “Why China Cannot Conquer Taiwan,” International Security 25, no. 2, Fall 2000, pp. 51–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Michael A. Glosny, “Strangulation from the Sea? A PRC Submarine Blockade of Taiwan,” International Security 28, no. 4, Spring 2000, pp. 125–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Robert S. Ross, “Navigating the Taiwan Strait: Deterrence, Escalation Dominance, and U.S.-China Relations,” International Security 27, no. 2, Fall 2002, pp. 48–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. David A. Shlapak, David T. Orletsky, and Barry A. Wilson, Dire Strait? Military Aspects of the China-Taiwan Confrontation and Options for U.S. Policy, RAND, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bernard D. Cole, Taiwan’s Security: History and Prospects. New York: Routledge, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  24. William S. Murray, “Revisiting Taiwan’s Defense Strategy,” Naval War College Review, Summer 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zhao Keshi, “Theoretical Innovations and Scientific Practice in Improving the Armed Forces’ Combat Capabilities by the Communist Party of China Leadership Since Reform and Opening Up,” May 2008, China Military Science, pp. 47–56.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Susan Shirk, China -Fragile Superpower—How China’s Internal Politics Could Derail Its Peaceful Rise, Oxford University Press, 2007, p. 139.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Peter Hayes Gries, China’s New Nationalism: Pride, Politics and Diplomacy, University of California Press 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  28. James Townsend, “Chinese Nationalism,” Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs, January 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Edward Friedman, “Chinese nationalism: challenge to U.S. interests,” in The People’s Liberation Army and China in Transition, edited by Stephen J. Flanagan and Michael E. Marti, Washington: National Defense University Press, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  30. Suisheng Zhao, “Chinese Nationalism and its International Orientations,” Political Science Quarterly, Spring 2000

    Google Scholar 

  31. Yongnian Zheng, Discovering Chinese Nationalism in China: Modernization, Identity, and International Relations, Cambridge University Press 1999

    Google Scholar 

  32. Shu Guang Zhang, Mao’s Military Romanticism: China and the Korean War, 1950–1953 (University Press of Kansas, 1995)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Richard C. Bush, Untying the Knot—Making Peace in the Taiwan Strait, Brookings, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Michael D. Swaine and Zhang Tuosheng with Danielle F. S. Cohen. Carnegie, Managing Sino-American Crises-Case Studies and Analysis, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Michael D. Swain, “Chinese Crisis Management: Framework for Analysis, Tentative Observations, And Questions for the Future,” in Andrew Scobell and Larry M. Wortzel, eds., Chinese Decisionmaking under Stress, Army War College Press, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Thomas Christensen, Useful Adversaries, Princeton University Press, 1996, p. 254.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Chen Youwei, “China’s Foreign Policymaking As Seen Through Tiananmen,” Journal of Contemporary China, November 2003, pp. 715–22.

    Google Scholar 

  38. John Wilson Lewis and Xue Litai, Imagined Enemies—China Prepares for Uncertain War, Stanford University Press, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Andrew Scobell, China’s Use of Military Force, Cambridge University Press, 2003.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  40. in William Whitson, editor, Military and Political Power in China in the 1970s, New York, Praeger; 1972, pp. 8–11.

    Google Scholar 

  41. John Fairbank, editor, The Chinese World Order, Harvard University Press, 1968

    Google Scholar 

  42. Richard Solomon, Mao’s Revolution and the Chinese Political Culture, University of California Press, 1971

    Google Scholar 

  43. Lucian Pye, The Mandarin and the Cadre: China’s Political Culture, University of Michigan Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Abram N. Shulsky, Deterrence Theory and Chinese Behavior, Rand, 2000, ch. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Mark Burles and Abram N. Shulsky, Patterns in China’s Use of Force, Rand, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Christopher Pherson, Meeting the Challenge of China’s Rising Power, Carlisle Papers in Security Strategy, Army War College, July 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Jenny W. Hsu, “U.S. Comfortable With Détente,” Taipei Times, March 19, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Roger Cliff, Mark Burles, Michael S. Chase, Derek Eaton, and Kevin L. Pollpeter, “Entering The Dragon’s Lair: Chinese Anti-Access Strategies And Their Implications For The United States,” RAND Corporation, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  49. Chung Chien, “High Tech War Preparation of the PLA: Taking Taiwan Without Bloodshed,” Taiwan Defense Affairs, Vol. 1, October 2000, pp. 141–62.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Michael Pillsbury, “The Taiwan Relations Act and U.S.-Taiwan Military Relations,” April 9–10, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  51. Michael O’Hanlon, “Why China Cannot Conquer Taiwan,” International Security 25, no. 2 (Fall 2000), pp. 51–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Michael A. Glosny, “Strangulation from the Sea? A PRC Submarine Blockade of Taiwan,” International Security 28, no. 4 (Spring 2000), pp. 125–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Robert S. Ross, “Navigating the Taiwan Strait: Deterrence, Escalation Dominance, and U.S.-China Relations,” International Security 27, no. 2 (Fall 2002), pp. 48–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. David A. Shlapak, David T. Orletsky, and Barry A. Wilson, Dire Strait? Military Aspects of the China-Taiwan Confrontation and Options for U.S. Policy (Santa Monica, Calif.: RAND, 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Thomas J. Christensen, “Posing Problems without Catching Up: China’s Rise and Challenges for U.S. Security Policy,” International Security 25, no. 4 (Spring 2001), pp. 5–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Lyle Goldstein and William Murray, “Undersea Dragons: China’s Maturing Submarine Force,” International Security 28, no. 4 (Spring 2004), pp. 161–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Bernard D. Cole, Taiwan’s Security: History and Prospects (London: Routledge, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2011 Cheng-yi Lin and Denny Roy

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pillsbury, M. (2011). U.S. Debates About Taiwan’s Security, 1979–2009. In: Lin, Cy., Roy, D. (eds) The Future of United States, China, and Taiwan Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230118966_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics