Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to identify the most important security and military issues that have surrounded the implementation of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA).1 Since 1979, many former American officials have testified to the Congress or written papers for various think tanks about these controversial security issues. It may be many years before the internal records of the U.S. government are declassified for historians to study these controversies inside the U.S. government. However, in the meantime, by examining the debates among former officials, at least some indirect knowledge of the range of policy options can be glimpsed. To my knowledge, these debates have not been drawn together in one place to provide a guide to security issues and controversies that have surrounded the TRA. This paper does not attempt to explain the origins of these issues or why former officials differ in their views. Retired Admiral Eric McVadon, former defense attaché in Beijing, has testified that how one characterizes China’s military and security influence is often a function of whether one leans toward “China bashing” or “Panda hugging.”2
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Rear Admiral Eric A. McVadon, U.S. Navy (Retired), Testimony before the U.S.-China Economic & Security Review Commission, March 4, 2009, Washington DC.
Jenny W. Hsu, “U.S. Comfortable With Détente,” Taipei Times, March 19, 2009.
This section draws on David Tawei Lee, The Making of the Taiwan Relations Act (Oxford University Press, 2000).
Kenneth T. Young, Negotiating With the Chinese Communists: The United States Experience, 1953–1967, McGraw-Hill, 1968.
Stephen S. F. Chen, “The Foreign and Cross-Strait Policies of the New Administration in the Republic of China,” Chatham House, London, December 8, 2008.
David Tawei Lee, The Making of the Taiwan Relations Act, Oxford University Press, 2000.
Jaw-Ling Joanne Chang, “Managing U.S. Taiwan Relations: Twenty Years After the Taiwan Relations Act,” United States-Taiwan Relations: Twenty Years after the Taiwan Relations Act, University of Maryland School of Law 2000, edited by Jaw-Ling Joanne Chang and William W. Boyer.
Cheng-Yi Lin, “The U.S. Role in Taiwan China Security Relations,” United States-Taiwan Relations: Twenty Years after the Taiwan Relations Act, University of Maryland School of Law 2000, edited by Jaw-Ling Joanne Chang and William W. Boyer.
Yann-Huei Song, “The Second Decade of the Taiwan Relations Act: U.S. Congressional Involvement in the Implementation ofthe Law,” United States-Taiwan Relations: Twenty Years after the Taiwan Relations Act, University of Maryland School of Law 2000, edited by Jaw-Ling Joanne Chang and William W. Boyer.
Robert G. Kaiser and Steven Mufson, “Blue Team Draws a Hard Line on Beijing: Action on Hill Reflects Informal Group’s Clout,” Washington Post, February 22, 2000, p. A1.
Robert G. Kaiser and Steven Mufson, “Blue Team Draws a Hard Line on Beijing: Action on Hill Reflects Informal Group’s Clout,” Washington Post, February 22, 2000, p. A1.
Robert G. Kaiser and Steven Mufson, “Blue Team Draws a Hard Line on Beijing: Action on Hill Reflects Informal Group’s Clout,” Washington Post, February 22, 2000, p. A1.
See David Shambaugh, “A Matter of Time: Taiwan’s Eroding Military Advantage,” Washington Quarterly, 23 (Spring 2000), 119–33
Thomas E. Ricks, “Taiwan Seen Vulnerable to Attack: Pentagon Study Says Isolation Keeps Defense Weak,” The Washington Post, 31 March 2000, p. Al.
Ralph A. Cossa, Brad Glosserman, Michael A. McDevitt, Nirav Patel, James Przystup and Brad Roberts, The United States and the Asia-Pacific Region: Security Strategy for the Obama Administration, 2009, p. 49. Available at www.cnas.org/files/documents/publications/CossaPatel_US_Asia-Pacific_February2009.pdf.
Robert Sutter, “Cross-Strait Moderation and the United States—Policy Adjustments Needed,” Pacific Forum CSIS Honolulu, Hawaii, Number 17, March 5, 2009.
Robert Sutter, “Cross-Strait Moderation and the United States—Policy Adjustments Needed,” Pacific Forum CSIS Honolulu, Hawaii, Number 17, March 5, 2009.
Dan Blumenthal and Aaron Friedberg, An American Strategy For Asia—A Report Of The Asia Strategy Working Group, AEI, January 2009.
Michael O’Hanlon, “Why China Cannot Conquer Taiwan,” International Security 25, no. 2, Fall 2000, pp. 51–86
Michael A. Glosny, “Strangulation from the Sea? A PRC Submarine Blockade of Taiwan,” International Security 28, no. 4, Spring 2000, pp. 125–60
Robert S. Ross, “Navigating the Taiwan Strait: Deterrence, Escalation Dominance, and U.S.-China Relations,” International Security 27, no. 2, Fall 2002, pp. 48–85
David A. Shlapak, David T. Orletsky, and Barry A. Wilson, Dire Strait? Military Aspects of the China-Taiwan Confrontation and Options for U.S. Policy, RAND, 2000).
Bernard D. Cole, Taiwan’s Security: History and Prospects. New York: Routledge, 2006.
William S. Murray, “Revisiting Taiwan’s Defense Strategy,” Naval War College Review, Summer 2008.
Zhao Keshi, “Theoretical Innovations and Scientific Practice in Improving the Armed Forces’ Combat Capabilities by the Communist Party of China Leadership Since Reform and Opening Up,” May 2008, China Military Science, pp. 47–56.
Susan Shirk, China -Fragile Superpower—How China’s Internal Politics Could Derail Its Peaceful Rise, Oxford University Press, 2007, p. 139.
Peter Hayes Gries, China’s New Nationalism: Pride, Politics and Diplomacy, University of California Press 2004.
James Townsend, “Chinese Nationalism,” Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs, January 1992.
Edward Friedman, “Chinese nationalism: challenge to U.S. interests,” in The People’s Liberation Army and China in Transition, edited by Stephen J. Flanagan and Michael E. Marti, Washington: National Defense University Press, 2003
Suisheng Zhao, “Chinese Nationalism and its International Orientations,” Political Science Quarterly, Spring 2000
Yongnian Zheng, Discovering Chinese Nationalism in China: Modernization, Identity, and International Relations, Cambridge University Press 1999
Shu Guang Zhang, Mao’s Military Romanticism: China and the Korean War, 1950–1953 (University Press of Kansas, 1995)
Richard C. Bush, Untying the Knot—Making Peace in the Taiwan Strait, Brookings, 2005.
Michael D. Swaine and Zhang Tuosheng with Danielle F. S. Cohen. Carnegie, Managing Sino-American Crises-Case Studies and Analysis, 2006.
Michael D. Swain, “Chinese Crisis Management: Framework for Analysis, Tentative Observations, And Questions for the Future,” in Andrew Scobell and Larry M. Wortzel, eds., Chinese Decisionmaking under Stress, Army War College Press, 2005.
Thomas Christensen, Useful Adversaries, Princeton University Press, 1996, p. 254.
Chen Youwei, “China’s Foreign Policymaking As Seen Through Tiananmen,” Journal of Contemporary China, November 2003, pp. 715–22.
John Wilson Lewis and Xue Litai, Imagined Enemies—China Prepares for Uncertain War, Stanford University Press, 2006.
Andrew Scobell, China’s Use of Military Force, Cambridge University Press, 2003.
in William Whitson, editor, Military and Political Power in China in the 1970s, New York, Praeger; 1972, pp. 8–11.
John Fairbank, editor, The Chinese World Order, Harvard University Press, 1968
Richard Solomon, Mao’s Revolution and the Chinese Political Culture, University of California Press, 1971
Lucian Pye, The Mandarin and the Cadre: China’s Political Culture, University of Michigan Press, 1988.
Abram N. Shulsky, Deterrence Theory and Chinese Behavior, Rand, 2000, ch. 6.
Mark Burles and Abram N. Shulsky, Patterns in China’s Use of Force, Rand, 2000.
Christopher Pherson, Meeting the Challenge of China’s Rising Power, Carlisle Papers in Security Strategy, Army War College, July 2006.
Jenny W. Hsu, “U.S. Comfortable With Détente,” Taipei Times, March 19, 2009.
Roger Cliff, Mark Burles, Michael S. Chase, Derek Eaton, and Kevin L. Pollpeter, “Entering The Dragon’s Lair: Chinese Anti-Access Strategies And Their Implications For The United States,” RAND Corporation, 2007
Chung Chien, “High Tech War Preparation of the PLA: Taking Taiwan Without Bloodshed,” Taiwan Defense Affairs, Vol. 1, October 2000, pp. 141–62.
Michael Pillsbury, “The Taiwan Relations Act and U.S.-Taiwan Military Relations,” April 9–10, 1999
Michael O’Hanlon, “Why China Cannot Conquer Taiwan,” International Security 25, no. 2 (Fall 2000), pp. 51–86
Michael A. Glosny, “Strangulation from the Sea? A PRC Submarine Blockade of Taiwan,” International Security 28, no. 4 (Spring 2000), pp. 125–60
Robert S. Ross, “Navigating the Taiwan Strait: Deterrence, Escalation Dominance, and U.S.-China Relations,” International Security 27, no. 2 (Fall 2002), pp. 48–85
David A. Shlapak, David T. Orletsky, and Barry A. Wilson, Dire Strait? Military Aspects of the China-Taiwan Confrontation and Options for U.S. Policy (Santa Monica, Calif.: RAND, 2000)
Thomas J. Christensen, “Posing Problems without Catching Up: China’s Rise and Challenges for U.S. Security Policy,” International Security 25, no. 4 (Spring 2001), pp. 5–40
Lyle Goldstein and William Murray, “Undersea Dragons: China’s Maturing Submarine Force,” International Security 28, no. 4 (Spring 2004), pp. 161–96
Bernard D. Cole, Taiwan’s Security: History and Prospects (London: Routledge, 2006)
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2011 Cheng-yi Lin and Denny Roy
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pillsbury, M. (2011). U.S. Debates About Taiwan’s Security, 1979–2009. In: Lin, Cy., Roy, D. (eds) The Future of United States, China, and Taiwan Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230118966_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230118966_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-29471-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-11896-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)