Christ’s Lips Move
In the Old English life of Saint Andrew, a late tenth-century Vercelli Book text known as Andreas, the ability to recognize the divine voice is a criterion by which believers are distinguished from non-believers. These two discursive communities are embodied in Andrew himself, who preaches Christian doctrine yet initially balks at a request made by Christ himself to go rescue his fellow apostle Matthew from the Mermedonians, cannibalistic heathens who live in Ethiopia. Andrew assents but still has divine payback to face because of his resistance to obeying Christ’s command. Christ adopts the form of the sea captain taking Andrew and his disciples on the dreaded trip to Mermedonia. As the two men talk, the conversation turns to the subject of Andrew’s master—the one who preached and performed miracles. The apostle falls for the sailor’s trick and proceeds to tell him stories about Christ until the ship lands. Once in Mermedonia, Andrew gives conflicting reports about his lengthy conversation with this sea captain. To his men, the apostle alleges that even though Christ had disguised his form (856, þeh he his mægwlite besiðen hæfde), he recognized Christ’s speech (855, word).1 A short time later, however, Andrew makes no such claim to Christ himself. Instead, he asks Christ why he was unable to recognize him on the sea voyage.
KeywordsVocal Performance Divine Revelation Loud Voice Christian Teaching Exeter Book
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 6.Christopher Fee, “Productive Destruction: Torture, Text and the Body in the Old English Andreas,” Essays in Medieval Studies 11 (1994): 51–62, 53.Google Scholar
- 9.John Casteen, “Andreas: Mermedonian Cannibalism and Figural Narrative,” Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 75 (1974) 74–8, 77.Google Scholar
- 11.Irving, “A Reading of Andreas,” lists works that treat Andreas as greatly indebted to or that are “feeble imitation[s] of Beowulf” (215); Leonard J. Peters, “The Relationship of the Old English Andreas to Beowulf,” PMLA 66 (1951), 844–63, argues that direct influence of Beowulf on Andreas cannot be proven.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 39.Frederick M. Biggs, “The Passion of Andreas: Andreas 1398–1491,” Studies in Philology 85 (1988): 413–27, 419.Google Scholar
- 43.Thomas D. Hill, “Figural Narrative in Andreas,” Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 70 (1969): 261–273, 265–7;Google Scholar
- Marie Michelle Walsh, “The Baptismal Flood in the Old English Andreas: Liturgical and Typological Depths,” Traditio 33 (1977): 137–58.Google Scholar
- 47.Penn R. Szittya, “The Living Stone and the Patriarchs: Typological Imagery in Andreas, lines 706–810,” Journal of English and Germanic Philology 72 (1973): 167–74, 172–3.Google Scholar