Advertisement

Conclusion

  • Shennan Hutton
Part of the The New Middle Ages book series (TNMA)

Abstract

The oldest continuous records of ordinary economic transactions between private individuals from Ghent reveal a gender construction that allowed women access to legal performance, property management, and middling-status occupations throughout their adult lives. By focusing on the short period between 1339 and 1361 rather than on the process of change and the more numerous documents from later centuries, I have mapped the contours of this economic gender construction that helped to make Ghent one of the premier wool cloth production centers of Europe. Approaching the customary law as a site where norms are constructed and negotiated, I have used the sources of actual practice to recover mid-fourteenth-century norms while questioning as many assumptions as possible. Statistical analysis, prosopography, and examination of language have shown that many of the restrictions on women’s legal economic acts inscribed in the sixteenth-century prescriptive sources did not exist in actual practice in the mid-fourteenth century. The story of the loss of women’s opportunities and the growth of patriarchy by the sixteenth century has been told by others. But in 1350 that teleological outcome was unknown. Although seeds of the patrimonial construction were certainly present in mid-fourteenth-century Ghent, most Ghentenars seem to have been comfortable with women performing legal economic acts and managing property.

Keywords

Sixteenth Century Wool Cloth Fourteenth Century Male Relative Gender Construction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 11.
    R. C. Van Caenegem, “Law in the Medieval World,” in Legal History: A European Perspective (London and Rio Grande: Hambledon Press, 1991), 117–9 [115–48].Google Scholar
  2. 13.
    Jutta Gisela Sperling and Shona Kelly Wray, ed., Across the Religious Divide: Women, Property, and Law in the Wider Mediterranean (ca. 1300–1800) (New York: Routledge, 2010).Google Scholar
  3. Maryanne Kowaleski and Judith M. Bennett, “Crafts, Gilds, and Women in the Middle Ages: Fifty Years after Marian K. Dale,” in Sisters and Workers in the Middle Ages, ed. Judith M. Bennett, Elizabeth A. Clark, Jean F. O’Barr, B. Anne Vilen, and Sarah Westphal-Wihl (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989), pp. 11–25 [11–38];Google Scholar
  4. Heide Wunder, He Is the Sun, She Is the Moon: Women in Early Modern Germany, trans. Thomas Dunlap (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998), pp. 74–6;Google Scholar
  5. Simon Schama, The Embarrassment of Riches: An Interpretation of Dutch Culture in the Golden Age (London: Collins, 1987), pp. 402–4;Google Scholar
  6. 26.
    In contrast, see Miri Rubin, “The Languages of Late-Medieval Feminism,” in Perspectives on Feminist Political Thought in European History: From the Middle Ages to the Present, ed. Tjitske Akkerman and Siep Stuurman (London and New York: Routledge, 1998), pp. 37–9 [34–49], among many others.Google Scholar
  7. 33.
    Jo Ann McNamara and Suzanne Wemple, “The Power of Women Through the Family in Medieval Europe, 500–1100,” Feminist Studies I (1973): 126–42,Google Scholar
  8. Kimberly A. LoPrete, “The Gender of Lordly Women: The Case of Adela of Blois,” in Pawns or Players? Studies on Medieval and Early Modern Women, ed. Christine Meek and Catherine Lawless (Dublin: Four Courts Press, 2003), pp. 90–110.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Shennan Hutton 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shennan Hutton

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations