Skip to main content

Should Public Diplomacy Be Privatized?

  • Chapter
The Practice of Public Diplomacy

Abstract

Some argue that public diplomacy is not as strong and effective as it could be. Many of these critics argue that public diplomacy should be privatized. Others defend the current public diplomacy structure and results. The main question that this essay addresses is: “Should public diplomacy be privatized?—and what does that mean?” Furthermore, what should the relationship between the public and private sector be, with respect to public diplomacy?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. The primary forms of data collection for this essay were interviews and secondary data review. This report seeks to go beyond the excellent essay by a respected scholar that has asked the important questions and laid out the basic issues: Kathleen R. Fitzpatrick, “Privatized Public Diplomacy,” in ed. Philip Seib, Toward a New Public Diplomacy: Redirecting U.S. Foreign Policy (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009), p. 155.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Peter Peterson, “Privatising U.S. Public Diplomacy,” January 21, 2004, available at http://www.cfr.org/publication/6697/privatising_us_public_diplomacy.html (accessed November 17, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nancy Snow and Philip M. Taylor, eds., Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy (New York: Routledge, 2009), pp. 198–199.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Michael Holtzman, “Privatize Public Diplomacy,” The New York Times, August 8, 2002, available at http://www.nytimes.com/2002/08/08/opinion/08H0LT.html (accessed September 12, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  5. David E. Morey, testimony delivered to the Subcommittee on National Security, “Emerging Threats and International Relations U.S. Congress,” February 10, 2004, available at http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/…/public_diplomacy_morey_feb04.pdf (accessed November 17, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fred Coffey et al., “Making Public Diplomacy Effective,” January 2009, available at http://www.publicdiplomacy.org/17.htm (accessed November 1st, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  7. A.W. Goudie and David Stasavage, “A Framework for the Analysis of Corruption,” Crime, Law and Social Change, Vol. 29 (1998), pp. 113–127 and 131–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jan Melissen, ed., The New Public Diplomacy (New York: Palgrave-Macmillan, 2007) p. 188.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

William A. Rugh (Foreign Service officer)

Copyright information

© 2011 William A. Rugh

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kravec, N.G. (2011). Should Public Diplomacy Be Privatized?. In: Rugh, W.A. (eds) The Practice of Public Diplomacy. Palgrave Macmillan Series in Global Public Diplomacy. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230118652_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics