Skip to main content
  • 51 Accesses

Abstract

The null hypothesis, challenged here, is that competences delegated to the Commission remain limited to the Copenhagen enlargement context as institutionally designed. The general hypothesis derived from the theoretical framework is that the successful implementation of policies in the Copenhagen framework creates functional pressure for further integration (necessary condition) but that only if member state governments do not expect political spillover to ensue, they will tolerate an extension of the Commission’s action capacity (sufficient condition).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Authors

Copyright information

© 2011 Eva G. Heidbreder

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Heidbreder, E.G. (2011). The Analytical Framework: Design of the Empirical Study. In: The Impact of Expansion on European Union Institutions. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230118584_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics