Advertisement

Envisioning the (W)hole World “Behind Things” in Sam Mendes’s American Beauty

Chapter
  • 48 Downloads

Abstract

Sam Mendes’s American Beauty (1999) explicitly affirms the importance of upholding the prohibition against incest. In his DVD commentary on the film, Mendes himself sees his work as the tale of a man, Lester Burnham (Kevin Spacey), who becomes “a father again” by forgoing the chance to act on his fantasy—to sleep with his daughter’s teenage friend, Angela (Mena Suvari).1 The film understands this endorsement of the injunction against incest broadly and in terms we might characterize as Lacanian. Indeed, Lester’s gesture summons Lacan’s well-known account of the subject in/of language. The restoration of Lester as a father—his choice to sustain the paternal function—comes with his acceptance of Symbolic law or castration, with his own acknowledgment of the exigencies of being (dis)placed in language. That is to say, Lester’s refusal to sleep with Angela coincides with a recognition that the intimations of Otherness that compel and position the film’s celebrated videographer, Ricky Fitts (Wes Bentley), pertain to him as well. Ricky looks not to the superficial image of beauty that has driven Lester and that appears to yield a transparent access to self and other, but rather to remnants (even waste) that often point to an unseen world, a whole “life behind things.”

Keywords

Paternal Function Incest Taboo Film Viewer Symbolic Mediation Radical Otherness 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Gary Hentzi’s review in Film Quarterly 54, no. 2 (2000): 46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 4.
    Kaja Silverman, Male Subjectivity at the Margins (New York: Routledge, 1992), 65 (hereafter cited as MSAM).Google Scholar
  3. 6.
    Martin Jay, Downcast Eyes: the Denigration of Vision in Twentieth-Century Erench Thought (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993).Google Scholar
  4. 7.
    Julia Kristeva, “Psychoanalysis and the Polis,” in The Kristeva Reader, ed. Toril Moi (New York: Columbia University Press, 1986), 304.Google Scholar
  5. 10.
    Walter Benjamin, “On Some Motifs in Baudelaire,” in Illuminations, ed. Hannah Arendt, trans. Harry Zohn (New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World, 1968): 155–200 (hereafter cited as I).Google Scholar
  6. 12.
    Lee Edelman, “Rear Window’s Glasshole,” in Out Takes: Essays on Queer Theory and Film, ed. Ellis Hanson (Durham: Duke University Press, 1999), 93 (hereafter cited as RWG).Google Scholar
  7. 13.
    Alan Trachtenberg, “Photography/Cinema,” in Before Hollywood: Turn of the Century Film from the Archives, ed. Charles Musser (New York: American Federation of the Arts, 1986), 76 (hereafter cited as BH).Google Scholar
  8. 16.
    Akira Mizuta Lippit, “The Death of an Animal,” Film Quarterly 56, no. 1 (Fall 2002), 12 (hereafter cited as DOA).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Vincent J. Hausmann 2011

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations