Advertisement

Jobs, Jobs, Jobs

Chapter
  • 43 Downloads

Abstract

School boards are job machines. This is especially true in some small towns and suburbs, where the school system is a major, if not the largest, employer. School boards perform as gatekeepers in such places, opening doors to lifetime employment, pensions, and health benefits for the chosen few. Jobs are available on all levels as school systems hire not only certificated educators but secretaries, lunchroom workers, teacher aides, security officers, bus drivers, crossing guards, custodians, groundskeepers, and a host of other nonprofessionals. Many such positions do not require a college degree and provide a kind of security seldom found any longer in private sector employment. As a matter of fact, Paul E. Peterson, a government professor at Harvard University, wrote that the number of pupils for each member of the support staff declined from 58 in 1960 to 43 in 1970 to 27 in 2005.1 Jobs on the support staff, in other words, proliferated at a faster rate than enrollment.

Keywords

School District School System Board Member Collective Bargaining School Board 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Paul E. Peterson, “What Is Good For General Motors … Is Good for Education,” Education Nex. 9, no. 2 (Spring 2009): 5.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jennifer Medina and Robert Gebeloif, “With More Money, City Schools Added Jobs, Many at Top Dollar,” New York Times, July 1, 2009, 1.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mary McCain, Serving Students: A Survey of Contracted Food Service Work in New Jersey’s K-12 Public School. (New Bunswick, NJ: Rutgers Center for Women and Work, Rutgers University, 2009).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eleanor Chute, “Advantages Aside, Montour Troubled,” Post-Gazette, September 28, 2009.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brian C. Rittmeyer, “Party Boss Is Said to Have Dominated Montour Board,” Tribune- Review, November 9, 2003.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Joseph Tanfani and Mark Fazlollah, “A Drain on City’s Struggling Schools,” Philadelphia Inquirer, May 4, 2009, A5.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Charles J. Russo, “The Legal Status of School Boards in the Intergovernmental System,” in School Boards: Changing Local Control, ed. Patricia F. First and Herbert J. Walberg (Berkeley, CA: McCutchan Publishing, 1992), 13–14.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jonah E. Rockoif, et al., “Can You Recognize an Effective Teacher When You Recruit One?” (working paper, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Keren Brooking, “Future Challenge of Principal Succession in New Zealand Schools: Implications of Quality and Gender,” International Studies in Educational Administratio. 36, no. 1 (2008): 41–55.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Summerford Accountancy PC, Report prepared for Wake County Board of Educatio. (Birmingham, AL: Summerford Accountancy PC, 2006.).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nate Carlisle, “2nd Guilty Plea Made in Davis Schools Scam,” Salt Lake Tribune, October 2, 2009.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    New Jersey School Board Association, “School Ethics Commission Issues Decisions on Board Member Conduct,” School Board Notes, November 14, 2008.Google Scholar
  13. 14.
    Susan Black, “Out of Bounds,” American School Board Journal. 196, no. 1 (January 2009): 37.Google Scholar
  14. 15.
    Raegen Miller and Robin Chait, Teacher Turnover, Tenure Policies, and the Distribution of Teacher Qualit. (Washington, DC: Center for American Progress, 2008), 16.Google Scholar
  15. 16.
    National Council on Teacher Quality, State Teacher Quality Yearboo. (Washington, DC: National Council on Teacher Quality, 2009).Google Scholar
  16. 18.
    Jennifer Medina, “Progress Slow in Bloomberg Goal to Rid Schools of Bad Teachers,” New York Times, February 24, 2010, 1.Google Scholar
  17. 19.
    Jason Song, “Firing Tenured Teachers Can Be A Costly and Tortuous Task,” Los Angeles Times, May 3, 2009.Google Scholar
  18. 20.
    Jason Song, “Los Angeles Teacher Should Be Fired Immediately, Judge Again Rules,” Los Angeles Times, January 13, 2010.Google Scholar
  19. 21.
    Jason Song, “L.A. Unified Pays Teachers Not to Teach,” Los Angeles Times, May 6, 2009.Google Scholar
  20. 22.
    Javier C. Hernandez, “Budget Bind Turns Spotlight on Reserve Teacher Policy,” New York Times, September 26, 2008, B3.Google Scholar
  21. 24.
    Del Stover and Glenn Cook, “Legal List: Top 10 Issues,” American School Board Journal. 196, no. 2 (February 2009): 16–25.Google Scholar
  22. 25.
    Ting-Yi Oei, “My Students, My Cellphone, My Ordeal,” Washington Post, April 19, 2009.Google Scholar
  23. 26.
    U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits in the United State. (Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, 2009).Google Scholar
  24. 27.
    Raegen T. Miller, Richard J. Murnane, and John B. Willett, Do Teacher Absences Impact Student Achievement? Longitudinal Evidence from One Urban School Distric. (Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 28.
    Il Hwan Chung, et al., Documenting Variation in Teacher Contract Provisions Across New York School District. (Syracuse, NY: Education and Finance Accountability Program, Syracuse University, 2008), ii.Google Scholar
  26. 29.
    Employee Benefits Research Institute, Facts from EBR. (Washington, DC: Employee Benefits Research Institute, 2007), 2.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Gene I. Maeroff 2010

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations