Abstract
Under the guise of democracy, each state is free to set standards for its students and those standards may be as low as the state wishes. The federal government does not dictate standards for learning. The No Child Left Behind law, enacted at the beginning of this century, required public school students to meet state standards, but the fact that some states called for low standards got insufficient attention. There was nothing to prevent an individual local school board from lifting its standards above those in the rest of the state, but scant incentive to do so given that its schools might face sanctions for not meeting the higher standards.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Frederick M. Hess, School Boards at the Dawn of the 21st Centur. (Alexandria, VA: National School Boards Association, 2002), 4.
Martha Abele Mac Iver, Robert Balfanz, and Vaughan Byrnes, Dropouts in the Denver Public Schools: Early Warning Signals and Possibilities for Prevention and Recover. (Baltimore, MD: The Center for the Social Organization of Schools, Johns Hopkins University, 2009).
Strategic Support Team of the Council of the Great City Schools. Accelerating Achievement in the Denver Public Schools, 2008–0. (Washington, DC: Council of Great City Schools, 2009), 107.
Jeremy Meyer, “DPS Graduation Rate Higher, But Only About Half Finish on Time,” Denver Post, December 18, 2009.
Debra Viadero, “Early-Algebra Push Seen to Be Flawed,” Education Week, February 10, 2010, 1.
Ann Duifett and Steve Farkas, Growing Pains in the Advanced Placement Program: Do Tough Trade-Offs Lie Ahead. (Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2009).
Dave E. Marcotte and Steven W. Hemelt, “Unscheduled School Closings and Student Performance,” Education Finance and Polic. 3, no. 3 (2008): 316–38.
Rick Fry and Felisa Gonzales, One-in-Five and Growing Fast: A Profile of Hispanic Public School Student. (Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center, 2008).
James Vaznis, “City Schools Challenged by Shifting Ethnic Mix,” Boston Globe, April 19, 2009.
Debra Viadero, “Research Hones Focus on ELLs,” Education Week, January 8, 2009, 22.
Mauricio Gaston Institute for Latin Community Development and Public Policy, English Language Learners in Massachusetts: Trends in Enrollments and Outcome. (Boston: Mauricio Gaston Institute for Latin Community Development and Public Policy, University of Massachusetts at Boston, 2009), 1–2.
E. D. Hirsch Jr., “How Schools Fail Democracy,” Chronicle Review, September 29, 2009.
Sam Dillon, “New Push Seeks to End Need for Pre-College Remedial Classes,” New York Times, May 28, 2009, A14.
North Carolina Justice Center, “This Academic Genocide Must End,” Legislative Bulletin, April 28, 2009.
Michael D. Usdan, “School Boards: A Neglected Component of School Reform,” ECS Governance Notes, March-April 2005.
Copyright information
© 2010 Gene I. Maeroff
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Maeroff, G.I. (2010). The School Board’s Impact on Student Learning. In: School Boards in America. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230117495_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230117495_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-0-230-10931-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-11749-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Education CollectionEducation (R0)