Advertisement

Other Ways to Govern Schools

Chapter
  • 43 Downloads

Abstract

If the school board is not the proper vehicle for looking after the educational interests of a community’s children, then what is the alternative? There has been a range of other approaches across the country, though most school districts have been largely untouched by these experiments, and the traditional school board has continued to carry on unimpeded with business as usual in most locales. This could mean that no place has found a better form of governance or that the weight of the status quo is just too heavy to lift. Yet efforts to diminish board authority have a long history and remain viable. Various forms of school-based management during the final decades of the twentieth century enhanced the power of school communities, reducing the authority of central boards. The Chicago Reform Act, passed by the Illinois legislature in 1988, for instance, exemplifies this approach. It provided for governance through local school councils, empowering parents, other residents, and teachers to select principals and to have input.

Keywords

Public School School District School System School Board Charter School 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    Arne Duncan, “School Reform Means Doing What’s Best for Kids,” Wall Street Journal, April 22, 2009, editorial.Google Scholar
  2. 4.
    Jessani Gordon, “State Continues Shortchanging Charter School Children,” Star- Ledger, May 14, 2009, 15.Google Scholar
  3. 8.
    Donald R. McAdams, What School Boards Can Do: Reform Governance for Urban School. (New York: Teachers College Press, 2006), 10.Google Scholar
  4. 9.
    Joseph P. Viteritti, “Should Mayors Run Schools?” Education Week, April 8, 2009, 32.Google Scholar
  5. 10.
    Gerald Bracey, “Mayoral Control of Schools: The New Tyranny,” Huffington Post, July 21, 2009.Google Scholar
  6. 11.
    Michael D. Usdan, “Mayors and Public Education: The Case for Greater Involvement,” Harvard Educational Review, Summer 2006, 149.Google Scholar
  7. 12.
    Frederick M. Hess, Assessing the Case for Mayoral Control of Urban School. (Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, 2008), 3.Google Scholar
  8. 13.
    Gene I. Maeroff, Building Blocks: Making Children Successful in the Early Years of Schoo. (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006).Google Scholar
  9. 15.
    Jenry Goodrich-Small, “The Impact of the Mayoral Takeover on the Attitudes of Administrators in the Harrisburg School District” (PhD diss., Temple University, May 2009).Google Scholar
  10. 16.
    Paul G. Vallas and Leslie R. Jacobs, “‘Race to the Top’ Lessons from New Orleans,” Education Week, September 2, 2009, 26.Google Scholar
  11. 17.
    Paul E. Peterson and Matthew M. Chingos, “For-Profit and Nonprofit Management in Philadelphia Schools,” Education Nex. 9, no. 2 (Spring 2009): 65–70.Google Scholar
  12. 18.
    Howard Blume and Jason Song, “Vote Could Open 250 L.A. Schools to Outside Operators,” Los Angeles Times, August 25, 2009.Google Scholar
  13. 19.
    Diane Ravitch, “Why Public Schools Need Democratic Governance,” Phi Delta Kappa. 91, no. 6 (March 2010): 24–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Gene I. Maeroff 2010

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations