Skip to main content

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac: Creatures of Regulatory Privilege

  • Chapter

Abstract

As part of its response to the ongoing credit crisis, the federal government placed Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-chartered, privately owned mortgage finance companies, in conservatorship. These two massive companies are profit-driven, but as government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) they also have a government-mandated mission to provide liquidity and stability to the United States mortgage market and to achieve certain affordable housing goals. How the two companies should exit their conservatorship is of key importance to the future of federal housing finance policy. Indeed, this question is of pressing importance as the Obama Administration has signaled that it would rely heavily on Fannie and Freddie as part of the short-term response to the foreclosure epidemic that has swept across America in the last couple of years. Once the acute crisis is dealt with, however, the Administration will need to put American housing finance policy on the right track for the long-term health of the system. This will require a framework for analyzing the needs of that system, a framework that this chapter provides.

This chapter is based in large part on “Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and the Future of Federal Housing Finance Policy: A Study of Regulatory Privilege,” Alabama Law Review 61, (forthcoming 2010).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Block, C. (2003–2004). Congress and accounting scandals: Is the pot calling the kettle black? Nebraska Law Review 82: 365–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breyer, S. G. (1982). Regulation and its reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodley, J. F. (1987). The economic goals of antitrust: Efficiency, consumer welfare and technological progress. New York University Law Review 62: 1020–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning, L. (2008, December 10). Ex-officer faults mortgage giants for “orgy” of nonprime loans. The New York Times, p. B3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crew, M. A., and C. K. Rowley, (1988). Dispelling the disinterest in deregulation. In C. K. Rowley, R. D. Tollison, G. Tullock, G. (eds.) The political economy of rent-seeking. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crew, M. A. (1989). Feasibility of deregulation: a public choice analysis. In M. A. Crew, (ed.), Deregulation and diversification of utilities. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Engel, K.C., and P. A. McCoy (2007). Turning a blind eye: Wall street finance of predatory lending. Fordham Law Review 75: 2039–2104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Froomkin, M. (1995). Reinventing the government corporation. University of Illinois Law Review 1995: 543–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagerty, J. R. (2007, July 28). Fannie, Freddie are said to suffer in subprime. The Wall Street Journal, p. A3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008, Pub. L. No. 110-289 (2008). 122 Stat. 2654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koppell, J. G. (2003). The politics of quasi-government. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OFHEO (2003). Systemic risk: Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the role of OFHEO. Washington, DC: Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight.

    Google Scholar 

  • OMB (1995). Memorandum on government corporations (M-96-05). Retrieved from www.whitehouse.gov/omb/assets/omb/memoranda/m96-05.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, D. (2008). The federal government’s implied guarantee of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s obligations: Uncle Sam will pick up the tab. Georgia Law Review 42: 1019–1083.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanton, T. H. (2002). Government-sponsored enterprises: Mercantilist companies in the modern 2d. Washington, DC: AEI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanton, T. H., and R. Moe (2002). Government corporations and government-sponsored enterprises. In L. M. Salaman, (ed.), The tools of government: A guide to the new governance (80–116). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein, C. (1990). After the rights revolution: Reconceiving the regulatory state. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Justice (n.d.). About the division: Antitrust division. Retrieved January 21, 2010 from http://www.justice.gov/atr/about/mission.htm.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2010 Robert R. Bliss and George G. Kaufman

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Reiss, D.J. (2010). Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac: Creatures of Regulatory Privilege. In: Bliss, R.R., Kaufman, G.G. (eds) Financial Institutions and Markets. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230117365_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics