Abstract
We suggest a subtle, yet far-reaching, tension in the objectives specified by the Monetary Control Act of 1980 (MCA) for the Federal Reserve’s role in providing retail payment services, such as check processing. Specifically, we argue that the requirement of an overall cost-revenue match, coupled with the goal of ensuring equitable access on a universal basis, partially shifted the burden of cost recovery from high-cost to low-cost service points during the MCA’s early years, thereby allowing private-sector competitors to enter the low-cost segment of the market and undercut the relatively uniform prices charged by the Fed. To illustrate this conflict, we develop a voter model for what begins as a monopoly setting in which a regulatory regime that establishes a uniform price irrespective of cost differences, and restricts total profits to zero, initially dominates through majority rule both deregulation and regulation that sets price equal to cost on a bank-by-bank basis. Uniform pricing is dropped in this model once cream skimming has subsumed half the market. These results help illumine the Federal Reserve’s experience in retail payments under the MCA, particularly the movement over time to a less uniform fee structure for check processing.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
The authors wish to thank Vadim Anshelevich, Hesna Genay, Gautam Gowrisankaran, Preston McAfee, Marci Rossell, Bruce Smith, Joanna Stavins, Ed Stevens, James Thomson, David Van Hoose, John Weinberg, and participants at the 1998 Southern Economic Association meetings in Baltimore and the Federal Reserve Financial Services Research Group Workshop for comments and suggestions. The views expressed may or may not coincide with the positions of the Federal Reserve Banks of Chicago or Dallas, or the Federal Reserve System.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Committee on the Federal Reserve in the Payments Mechanism (1997), Summary of Input from Payments System Forums. Washington, D.C.: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September.
Eckel, Catherine, and Charles A. Holt (1989), “Strategic voting in agenda-controlled committee experiments” American Economic Review 79 (September): 763–73.
Federal Register (1980), Proposed fee schedules and pricing principles, 45 FR 58689, September 4.
Federal Register (1981), Adoption of fee schedules and pricing principles for Federal Reserve Bank services, 46 FR 1338, January 6.
Federal Register (1990), Approval of a private sector adjustment factor and fee schedules for Federal Reserve Bank priced services for 1991, 55 FR 46720, November 6.
Federal Reserve Bulletin (1981), Announcements, adoption of fee schedules, trans-portation services, November, p. 854.
Federal Reserve Regulatory Service (1994), Policy statement on surpluses and short¬falls that arise from the provision of Federal Reserve priced services, 7–135, March.
Federal Reserve Regulatory Service (1994), Standards related to priced-service activities of the Federal Reserve Banks, 7–137, March.
Federal Reserve Regulatory Service (1994), Provision of payment services to all depository institutions, 7–143, March.
Federal Reserve Regulatory Service (1994), Methodology for computing Federal Reserve Bank costs and fees, 7–147, March.
Interdistrict Check Manual (1990, 1998), Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.
Lacker, Jeffery M., and John A Weinberg (1998), “Can the Fed be a payment system innovator?” 1997Annual Report, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond.
Laffont, Jean-Jacques, and Jean Tirole (1990), “Optimal bypass and cream skim¬ming,” American Economic Review 80: December, 1042–61.
Stavins, Joanna (2004), “Do bank mergers affect Federal Reserve check volume?” Public Policy Discussion Papers No. 04-7, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, October.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2010 Robert R. Bliss and George G. Kaufman
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chakravorti, S., Gunther, J.W., Moore, R.R. (2010). Universal Access, Cost Recovery, and Payment Services. In: Bliss, R.R., Kaufman, G.G. (eds) Financial Institutions and Markets. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230117365_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230117365_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-29113-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-11736-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)