Abstract
As the terms of Zimbabwe’s negotiated political settlement were being concluded between the ruling Zimbabwe African National Union-Patriotic Front (ZANU-PF) and the Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) in the latter half of 2008, much of the concern focused around the dynamics of the power-sharing formula. With battle lines drawn over who should control significant portfolios such as the security forces and home affairs, it seemed that the protracted negotiations resolving the crisis over Zimbabwe’s acute political and economic decline had reached another stalemate. While the political pundits were trying to tease out an acceptable power-sharing framework, the dynamics of Zimbabwe’s post-conflict economic reconstruction had also become the subject of much debate.
In future, the recovery of Zimbabwe will bring significant benefits to the South African economy through increased employment, export earnings as well as remittances from profits earned by subsidiaries situated in Zimbabwe. Therefore, the assistance advanced to Zimbabwe by the South Africans will result in a win win situation for both countries.
—Elton Mangoma, Zimbabwean minister of economic planning and investment promotion, March 30, 2009
Some South African companies are even using the crisis, or are planning to use the crisis, to take over large swathes of the Zimbabwean economy. They are not alone in attempting to do so. British, French and Chinese companies are attempting to do exactly the same thing. Time will tell which countries’ capital will benefit the most out of this macabre race. One thing that is certain, however, is that the corporate vultures are descending; and this is happening at the cost of Zimbabwe’s remaining, and limited, sovereignty.
—Shawn Hattingh, October 4, 2007
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
In January 2010, the IMF restored Zimbabwe’s voting rights. This has enabled Zimbabwe to qualify for US$510 million loan package as part of the IMF’s global assistance package to help countries to cope with the 2009 financial crisis. According to Minister of Finance Tendai Biti, US$210 million of this IMF would be used for infrastructure development. Biti also announced that donors had pledged US$800 million toward Zimbabwe’s 2010 budget. See MacDonald Dzirutwe, “Zimbabwe Economy on Mend, 7 Pct Growth Seen in 2010,” Reuters News, December 2, 2009, http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/GEE5B11GP.htm.
See United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), Comprehensive Economic Recovery in Zimbabwe: A Discussion Document, Working Paper Series (UNDP Zimbabwe, 2008). http://www.undp.org.zw/images/stories/Docs/Publications/CompEconoRec2008.pdf.
See Brent Cloete and Greg Mills, “Scan of Zimbabwe Economic Recovery Literature,” Brenthurst Discussion Paper 4/2009, Johannesburg, April 2009.
Solidarity Peace Trust, “A Difficult Dialogue: Zimbabwe-South African Economic Relations Since 2000,” A Preliminary Report, October 23, 2007, http://www.solidari-typeacetrust.org/reports/difficult_dialogue.pdf.
See Patrick Bond, “Zimbabwe Under a Sub-imperial, Neo-liberal Thumb,” Pambazuka News, March 26, 2009, http://www.pambazuka.org/en/category/comment/55156;
Shawn Hattingh, “South Africa in Zimbabwe: The Vultures Have Descended,” Centre for Civil Society, Durban 2007: http://www.ukzn.ac.za/ccs/default.asp? 3, 28, 11, 3162;
William G. Martin, “South Africa’s Subimperial Futures: Washington Consensus, Bandung Consensus or Peoples Consensus?” Africa Files, http://www.africafiles.org/arti-cle.asp?ID=19153; and “South African Companies Unlock Sub-Saharan Africa,” Business Week, December 4, 2008, http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/08_50/b4112052173000.htm?campaign_id=rss_topStories.
See John Daniel, Varusha Naidoo, and Sanusha Naidu, “The South Africans Have Arrived: Post Apartheid Corporate Expansion,” in State of the Nation: South Africa 2003–2004, eds. John Daniel, Adam Habib, and Roger Southall (Cape Town: HSRC Press, 2004).
John Daniel and Nompumelelo Bhengu, “South Africa in Africa: Still a Formidable Player,” in A New Scramble for Africa? Imperialism, Investment and Development, eds. Roger Southall and Henning Melber (Scottsville, SA: University of KwaZulu Natal Press, 2009).
Richard Saunders, “Crisis, Capital, Compromise: Mining and Empower in Zimbabwe,” African Sociological Review: Special Issue: South Africa in Africa: African Perceptions, African Realities 12, no.1 (2008): 67.
See also Dianna Games, “A Nation in Turmoil,” 2006; and “The Experience of South African Firms Doing Business in Africa: A Preliminary Survey,” SAIIA Business in Africa Research Project Report No. 1, Braamfontein, 2004.
Tom Burgis and William Wallis, “Harare to Receive African Credit,” Financial Times, May 4, 2009.
Haru Mutasa, “China Buys The World: Zimbabwe’s Special Relationship,” Aljazeera.net, August 10, 2009.
This has been explicitly stated by Premier Wen Jiabao: “We should hasten the implementation of our ‘going out’ strategy and combine the utilization of foreign exchange reserves with the ‘going out’ of our enterprises.” See Stephen Marks, “Rio Case Could Signal a Shift,” Pambazuka News, Issue 443, July 23, 2009, http://www.pambazuka.org/en/category/africa_china/57937.
See Peter Kagwanja, “An Encumbered Regional Power? The Capacity Gap in South Africa’s Peace Diplomacy in Africa,” Democracy and Governance Research Programme Occasional Paper no. 6, Cape Town, 2009.
Postapartheid South Africa Africa’s policy is based on reintegrating democratic South Africa into the continent. Based on principles of mutual interest and development, democratic South Africa sought to project an African policy that articulates an image resonating with the African renaissance and pushing for African peace, stability, and development. Yet this approach is seen in certain quarters as ambivalent since Pretoria is trying to reconcile South Africa’s political power with its economic footprint that tends to reflect deep suspicion by African governments around whether democratic South Africa is behaving like its apartheid predecessor and importantly about whether it really represent the voice of the continent. See Chris Alden and Garth Le Pere, “South Africa in Africa: Bound to Lead?” Politikon: Special Edition on Africa’s Relations with Emerging Powers: Charting a New Direction in International Engagements 36, no. 1 (2009) (guest editors Sanusha Naidu, Lucy Corkin, and Hayley Herman).
John Brand and Mieke Krynauw, “Implications and Ramifications of Zimbabwe/SA Agreement on Investment Protection,” February 15, 2010, http://www.bowman.co.za/LawArticles/Law-Article~Content~Implications%20ramifications%20Zimbabwe.asp.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2011 Hany Besada
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Naidu, S. (2011). South African Corporate Expansion into Zimbabwe: Weathering the Storm and Reaping the Benefits. In: Besada, H. (eds) Zimbabwe. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230116436_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230116436_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-29253-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-11643-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)