Abstract
The importance of the Shiite community’s public opinion was very evident in the conduct of the Hezbollah movement in the 1990s. It worked, not without errors, toward the shaping of a policy that would support the resistance on the one hand and establish the legitimacy and the Lebanese character of the movement on the other hand while it blurred its image as a radical pan-Islamic movement. The voices of the electors in the ballot boxes determined, to a large degree, the legitimacy of the movement, its power versus the Amal movement, and its ability to influence the distribution of the public goods.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Nairn Qassem, Hezbollah—Al-ManhagAl-Tajriba Al-Mustakbal (Beirut: Dar Al Hadi, 2002), 81–87; Nidaa Al-Watan, 7 July 1997.
Olive Roy, The Failure of Political Islam (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996), 75–88.
Copyright information
© 2009 Eitan Azani
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Azani, E. (2009). Political Institutionalization and Public Discourse—Adaptation and Legitimization. In: Hezbollah: The Story of the Party of God. The Middle East In Focus. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230116290_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230116290_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-0-230-10872-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-11629-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)