Skip to main content

The Lusaka Ceasefire Agreement

  • Chapter
Crisis in the Congo
  • 128 Accesses

Abstract

On July 10, 1999, the allied heads of states of the DRC, Zimbabwe, Angola, and Namibia signed the Lusaka accord, as did their Ugandan and Rwandan counterparts. But the rebel leaders still held out from doing so. The signatories and the UN Security Council urged the rebel groups to resolve their differences and sign the agreement as soon as possible.1 President Chiluba launched a new round of diplomatic efforts, knowing full well that the ceasefire was unlikely to hold if the rebels themselves failed to agree to it. The rebels went as far as threatening to press on with their military campaign to oust Kabila.2 Acceding to Chiluba’s pressure, RCD-Goma, RCD Kisangani, and MLC factions met in Tanzania on July 22, 1999, at the invitation of the ex-Tanzanian president Julius Nyerere. In the period leading up to the meeting, the RCD-Goma vice president, Moise Nyarugabo, warned that just because the rebel groups had agreed to attend these talks did not necessarily mean that they would sign. In addition, Nyarugabo repeated that the RCD-Goma faction refused to acknowledge Ernest Wamba dia Wamba’s signature in the name of the RCD but noted that “if he forms a separate group, then he can sign for that group.”3

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. UN-DPI, “Security Council Members Welcome Signing of Accord on DRC; Urge Rebels to Follow Suit,” July 12, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Reuters, “African Ministers to Meet on Congo Ceasefire,” July 19, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  3. IRIN, “Special Report: South Africa’s New Drive to Achieve Progress in the DRC,” July 30, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  4. PANA, “DR Congo Peace Process Gets Fresh Impetus,” August 3, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  5. AFP, “Main Rebel Group to Sign Accord on Tuesday,” August 27, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  6. IRIN, “DRC: UN Welcomes Rebel Signing of Peace Accord,” September 1, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  7. AFP, “DR Congo Ceasefire Committees Meet at Long Last,” September 3, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Reuters, “Factions Sees Peace Deal Holding,” September 7, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  9. European Union, “DRC: Delays in the Implementation of the Lusaka Agreement,” September 22, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  10. EU, “Declaration by the Presidency on Behalf of the European Union on the DRC,” October 11, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  11. AFP, “France Pledges $700,000 to DR Congo Peace Commission,” October 19, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  12. AFP, “Five Million Dollars Raised for DRC Peace Process,” October 31, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  13. PANA, “Britain Donates £50,000 for Military Commission,” November 10, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  14. European Union, “The European Union Will Support the Implementation of the Lusaka Ceasefire Agreement and the Peace Process in the DRC by €1.2 Million,” November 15, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  15. IRIN-SA, “Africa: Holbrooke Outlines New U.S. Policy,” December 7. 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Government of Sweden, “Swedish Support to the Joint Military Commission in the DRC,” November 26, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  17. AFP, “New Timetable for DR Congo Peace Process Sought,” January 13, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  18. IRIN-CEA, “Uganda: IRIN Interview with Minister Amama Mbabazi,” March 17, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  19. AFP, “Signatories to the DR Congo Truce Agree on Total Ceasefire,” April 8, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  20. PANA, “Joint Military Commission on DRC Meets in Lusaka,” June 2, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Xinhua, “Political Committee for Congo Ceasefire Adopts Mechanisms,” June 9, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  22. IRIN-SA, “Zimbabwe: Troops to Withdraw for DRC,” July 14, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  23. IRIN-SA, “DRC/Africa: Nigerian, Ghana Troops for DRC,” July 14, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  24. AFP, “UN Security Council Finalizes DRC Draft Resolution,” July 23, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  25. AFP, “Security Council Approves Deployment of UN Personnel in DRC,” August 6, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  26. AFP, “DR Congo Belligerents Pledged to Keep UN Personnel Safe,” October 12, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  27. IRIN-SA, “South Africa: Conference on Peacekeeping Opens,” October 21, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  28. AFP, “France Seeks Security Guarantees for UN Observers in DR Congo,” November 8, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  29. UN secretary general, “Special Envoy for DRC Peace Process to Travel to Kinshasa, November 7–10,” November 8, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  30. AFP, “Kinshasa, UN Reach Accord on Deployment of Observers,” November 10, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Reuters, “UN Begins Delayed Congo Mission,” November 11, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  32. UN-DPI, “UN Begins Deployment of Remaining Military Liaison Officers to DRC,” November 24, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  33. AFP, “Four UN Observers Arrive in DR Congo HQ Town,” November 26, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  34. UN-DPI, “Mandate, Composition Approved for UN Mission in DRC,” November 30, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  35. IRIN-SA, “Southern Africa: Southern African Leaders Concerned at Slow Pace in DRC,” December 13, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  36. UN Security Council, “Security Council Briefed on DRC by Under-Secretary for Peacekeeping,” December 16, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  37. UN Security Council, “Security Council Briefed on DRC by Under-Secretary for Peacekeeping,” December 16, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Although based on the assumption that the parties to the conflict would respect the Lusaka peace accord, the proposal recognized the realities on the ground. See AFP, “UN’s Annan Recommends a 5,000-Member Protection Force for the DRC,” January 19, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  39. UN-DPI, “Security Council Holds Top-Level Meeting on DRC,” January 24, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  40. UN-SC, “Seven African Heads of State Address Security Council in Day-Long Meeting on DRC,” January 24, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kabila had been suspecting the South African government of supporting the rebels. See IRIN-SA, “South Africa-DRC: IRIN Focus on the Peacekeeping Debate,” January 26, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  42. On February 3, 2000, the UN Security Council was slated to begin working on a resolution to authorize a UN force to monitor ceasefire in the DRC. See Reuters, “UN Council Begins to Move on Troops for Congo,” January 26, 2000, and

    Google Scholar 

  43. Reuters, “UN Council Moves Closer to Sending Force to Congo,” February 3, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  44. UN-DPI, “Security Council Members Back Kofi Annan’s Proposed Force for DRC,” February 4, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  45. USAID, “Holbrooke Intends to Keep Emphasis on Africa,” February 4, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Christian Science Monitor, “U.S. Role in Africa’s Big War,” February 22, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Reuters, “African Leaders Open Talks on New Congo Peace Deal,” February 23, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  48. The force of 5,500 Blue Helmets planned by the UN was only the second phase of the program. According to Amama Mbabazi, the first one was the deployment of ninety liaison officers, 500 observers, and four battalions to protect them. See IRIN, “Ouganda: Entretien avec le Ministre Amama Mbabazi,” Mar, 7, 2000, and IRIN-CEA, Weekly Roundup: February 26–March 3, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  49. On April 7, 2000, the new Rwandan president, Paul Kagame, expressed doubt that the 5,500 Blue Helmets and observers were sufficient, but he acknowledged that it was a step in the right direction. See IRIN Update No. 899 for the Great Lakes, April 7, 2000, and UN-DPI, “UN Team in DRC Visits Potential Bases for Peacekeeping,” March 17, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  50. AFP, “OAU Chief Calls for Rapid UN Troops of Deployment in DRC,” April 11, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  51. AFP, “African Leaders Appeal for Rapid UN Aid after Congo Ceasefire,” April 9, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  52. USAID, “Holbrooke Urges Congress to Support Lusaka Peace Plan,” April 12, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  53. UN-DPI, “Annan’s Latest Report on DR Congo Shows Progress but Warns of Pitfalls,” April 20, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  54. UN-DPI, “Press Briefing by Special Representative for DRC,” April 25, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  55. AFP, “UN and Kinshasa Sign Agreement on Peacekeeping Force,” May 4, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  56. USAI, “Holbrooke Holds Press Conference in Kigali,” May 8, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  57. On June 29, 2000, the South African government approved $15 million toward the deployment of about 160 technical support staff to the UN mission in the DRC. The South African military staff awaited a deployment date from the UN. See AFP, “South Africa Government Approves $15 million for DR Congo Mission,” June 29, 2000,

    Google Scholar 

  58. and UN-DPI, “Security Council Welcomes Rwanda/Uganda Ceasefire of DR of Congo,” June 8, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  59. UN secretary general, “S.G. Appoints General Abdulsalami Abubakar of Nigeria as Special Envoy to the DRC,” August 18, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  60. AFP, “Kinshasa Says It Is Ready to Receive UN Peacekeepers,” September 3, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  61. While these diplomatic advances and the Security Council’s October 13 mandate extension until December 15, 2000 were positive developments, many UN officials were nonetheless growing frustrated. Some member states accused the UN of having a double standard for peacekeeping operations. See UN General Assembly, “Security Council Extended Role, ‘Double Standard’ among Issues Raised as Fourth Committee Concludes Discussion of Peacekeeping Operations,” November 10, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  62. On the African side, it was reported on November 30, 2000, in the meeting of the JPC that the belligerents had reaffirmed their pledges to withdraw their forces by at least 15 kilometers and that military chiefs would formally sign this new agreement in the Zimbabwean capital on December 5. See AFP, “DR of Congo Agrees to Discuss UN Observers Mission Says Mbeki,” November 27, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  63. UN-DPI, “Annan Recommends Six-Month Extension of UN Mission in DR of Congo,” December 7, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  64. UN secretary general, “S.G. in Statement on UN Mission in DRC Urges Respect for Terms of Lusaka Agreement,” December 14, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  65. The first functional meeting of the JMC took place in Kampala on October 11 and 12, 1999. On October 18, the meeting of the Political Committee had also (with the JMC) been delayed due to inadequate support from other countries and international organizations. See AFP, “UN Blamed for Slow Pace of DR Congo Peace,” October 18, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  66. IRIN-SA, “Southern Africa: Southern African Leaders Concerned at Slow Pace in DRC,” December 13, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  67. USIA, “Masire Rates US-UN Cooperation Vital to African Peace,” January 28, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  68. AFP, “DR Congo Mediator Ketumile Masire Due to Meet Rebels Wednesday,” May 15, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  69. PANA, “Cotonou to Host DRC Preparatory Peace Meeting,” May 30, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  70. USIA, “Statement on Democratic Republic of Congo,” June 4, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  71. USIA, “UN Security Council to Hold Major Session on DRC,” January 21, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  72. IRIN, Interview with the UN secretary general, Kofi Annan, February 1, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Reuters, “African Leaders Urge UN to Deploy Congo Force,” April 20, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  74. U.S. Department of State, “UN Security Council Mission Leaving for DRC,” May 1, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  75. U.S. Department of State, “Holbrooke on the DRC,” June 15, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  76. U.S. Department of State, “State Department Spokesman on the Lusaka Summit,” August 16, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  77. IRIN-SA, “Zimbabwe-DRC: Pressure Mounts for Troops to Leave,” August 14, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  78. AFP, “Lusaka Ceasefire Accord Stalls in DR Congo Peace Process,” August 29, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  79. UN-DPI, “Little Progress Made in DRC Peace Process, Says Annan,” September 22, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  80. UN-DPI, “Peace in DRC Depends on Will of Congolese People, Says UN Envoy,” December 21, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  81. AFP, “Meeting on DR Congo Conflict Postponed,” December 21, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2011 François Ngolet

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ngolet, F. (2011). The Lusaka Ceasefire Agreement. In: Crisis in the Congo. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230116252_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230116252_5

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-53645-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-230-11625-2

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics