Skip to main content

The Manufactured Patron: Staging Bourgeois Identity through Art Consumption in Postbellum America

  • Chapter
The American Bourgeoisie: Distinction and Identity in the Nineteenth Century

Abstract

In his scholarship on art collecting in nineteenth-century Spain, Oscar Vásquez urges study of the philosophies of cultural philanthropy in conjunction with its key sites and practices in order to fully comprehend how art consumption articulates, consolidates, and perpetuates social identities. Through analysis of the cultural ecology of postbellum San Francisco, this essay argues that California’s entrepreneurial elites reorganized the regional art world, particularly over the course of the watershed decade of the 1870s. For leading patrons, art gradually but dramatically changed its function from educational philanthropy to a mark of class distinction; its audience, from a democratic commonwealth of art lovers to a tight clique of connoisseurs; its location, from a public forum to a sacred precinct; and its scope, from local to national markets and beyond.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. “Acquisitions sites and procedures were inseparable from the discourses of collecting and, as such, helped to define differences among subject positions, that is, among individual and group identities” (Oscar E. Vasquez, Inventing the Art Collection: Patrons, Markets, and the State in Nineteenth-Century Spain [University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2001], 31). I borrow the notion of an “ecology” of art patronage from Albert Boime, “Entrepreneurial Patronage in Nineteenth-Century France,” in Enterprise and Entrepreneurs in Nineteenth- and Twentieth-Century France ed. Edward C. Carter II, Robert Forster, and Joseph N. Moody (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976) esp. 181–84.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See San Francisco Art Association, Constitution, By-laws, List of Members and Catalogue of Library, and Rules of the School of Design of the San Francisco Art Association (San Francisco: B. F. Sterett, 1878).

    Google Scholar 

  3. On the “Big Five,” see Cerinda W. Evans, Collis Potter Huntington (Newport News, VA: The Mariners’ Museum, 1954)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Oscar Lewis, The Big Four (New York and London: Alfred A. Knopf, 1938)

    Google Scholar 

  5. K. D. Kurutz, “Sacramento’s Pioneer Patrons of Art: The Edwin Bryant Crocker Family,” Golden Notes 31, 2 (1985) 1–32

    Google Scholar 

  6. Norman E. Tutorow, Leland Stanford: Man of Many Careers (Menlo Park, CA: Pacific Coast, 1971). “General” David Douty Colton was a Maine native who parlayed a law degree and political connections into a real estate fortune; in 1874 he became a substantial investor in and executive of the CPR. Another major player in the Central Pacific was Wells Fargo Bank President Lloyd Tevis. Together with Irving M. Scott, Peter and James Donahue owned and operated the prosperous Union Iron Works, whose profitability precipitated holdings in gas, transportation, mining, banking, and real estate. Equally diversified were William Alvord, president of the Risdon Iron Works and one-time San Francisco mayor

    Google Scholar 

  7. William Ralston, president of the Bank of California and owner of the lavish Palace Hotel; banker Darius Ogden Mills. Finally, James Ben Ali Haggin, Lloyd Tevis, and George Hearst coordinated numerous investments in mining, financing, and real estate. Significantly, the few local plutocrats who could claim a true working-class background, mostly the Irish-born “Silver Kings” of the Virginia Consolidated Mining Company (James G. Fair, James C. Flood, John W. Mackay, and William S. O’Brien), engaged in collecting neither as extensively nor as early. Peter Decker, Fortunes and Failures: White-Collar Mobility in Nineteenth Century San Francisco (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978) esp. 170–95

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. William Issel and Robert W. Cherny, San Francisco, 1865–1932: Politics, Power, and Urban Development (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1986) 29–33

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gray A. Brechin, Imperial San Francisco: Urban Power, Earthly Ruin (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999) 125–26, 211–12, 249–51

    Google Scholar 

  10. Judith Robinson, The Hearsts: An American Dynasty (Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1991)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Oscar Lewis, Silver Kings (New York and London: Alfred A. Knopf, 1959)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Richard H. Peterson, The Bonanza Kings: The Social Origins and Business Behavior of Western Mining Entrepreneurs, 1870–1900 (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Prominent figures on the cultural scene included Washington, D.C., banker William Wilson Corcoran, New York railroad barons John Taylor Johnston and Robert M. Olyphant, New York department store tycoon Alexander Stewart, and Philadelphia manufacturing and railroad executive Joseph Harrison. Among this later group, only clothing wholesaler Thomas B. Clarke could boast a career comparable to his prewar mercantile brethren. W. G. Constable, Art Collecting in the United States of America: An Outline of a History (Toronto and New York: Thomas Nelson and Sons, 1964) 10–30, 141–43

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lillian B. Miller, Patrons and Patriotism: The Encouragement of the Fine Arts in the United States, 1790–1860 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1966) 148–59

    Google Scholar 

  15. Frederick Baekeland, “Collectors of American Painting, 1813–1913,” American Art Review 3, 6 (1976) 121–48

    Google Scholar 

  16. Madeleine Fidell Beaufort and Jeanne K. Welcher, “Some Views of Art Buying in New York in the 1870s and 1880s,” Oxford Art Journal 5, 1 (1982) 48–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ella M. Foshay, Mr. Luman Reed’s Picture Gallery (New York: Harry N. Abrams, 1990) 11–17

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lance Lee Humphries, “Robert Gilmor, Jr.: Baltimore Collector and American Art Patron” (Ph.D. dissertation, University of Virginia, 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Carrie Rebora, “Robert Fulton’s Art Collection,” American Art Journal 22, no. 3 (1990) 40–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nicholas B. Wainwright, “Joseph Harrison, Jr.: A Forgotten Art Collector,” Antiques 102, no. 4 (1972) 660–68

    Google Scholar 

  21. Alan Wallach, Exhibiting Contradiction: Essays on the American Museum in the United States (Boston: University of Massachusetts Press, 1998) 22–37

    Google Scholar 

  22. Barbara H. Weinberg, “Thomas B. Clarke: Foremost Patron of American Art from 1872 to 1899,” American Art Journal 8, no. 1 (1976): 52–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hubert Howe Bancroft, The History of California (San Francisco: The History Company, 1890) 7:693

    Google Scholar 

  24. Thomas G. Shearman, “The Owners of the United States,” Forum 9 (1889) 262–73. E. B. Crocker may have not made this list because either he had died in 1875, or Sacramento was too small a city at the time, or his estate’s value was less than $20 million.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Quoted in Carol A. O’Connor, “A Region of Cities,” in The Oxford History of the American West ed. Clyde A. Milner II, Carol A. O’Conner, and Martha A. Sandweiss (New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994) 543.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mary P. Ryan, Civic Wars: Democracy and Public Life in the American City during the Nineteenth Century (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997) 282.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Marx is cited in Philip J. Ethington, The Public City: The Political Construction of Urban Life in San Francisco, 1850–1900 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994) 242.

    Google Scholar 

  28. In its inaugural year, the Exhibition garnered almost 30,000 single admissions and twice as many season tickets in a little under one month; by the 1870s, daily attendance often approached 30,000. Ellen Schwartz, Nineteenth-Century San Francisco Art Exhibition Catalogues (Davis: Library Associates, University Library, University of California, Davis, 1981) 2

    Google Scholar 

  29. Birgitta Hjalmarson, Artful Players: Artistic Life in Early San Francisco (Los Angeles: Balcony Press, 1999) 24–25

    Google Scholar 

  30. B. E. Lloyd, Lights and Shades in San Francisco (San Francisco: A. L. Bancroft, 1876) 116–19

    Google Scholar 

  31. J. H. Culver, “The Building of a State: IX. The Mechanics’ Institute,” Overland Monthly 8 (1886) 314–24

    Google Scholar 

  32. John W. Wood, 75 Years of History of the Mechanics’ Institute of San Francisco (San Francisco: Mechanics’ Institute, 1930);and the Mechanics’ Institute annual Industrial Exhibition reports.

    Google Scholar 

  33. William Alvord, quoted in “San Francisco Art Association,” Alta California March 27, 1872, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  34. B. P. Avery, “Art Beginnings on the Pacific: II,” Overland Monthly 1, 2 (1868) 113–19

    Google Scholar 

  35. Julian Dana, The Man Who Built San Francisco (New York: McMill, 1937) 93

    Google Scholar 

  36. Raymond Wilson, “Painters of California’s Silver Era,” American Art Journal (1984) 73.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Julia Cooley Altrocchi, The Spectacular San Franciscans (New York: E. P. Dutton, 1949) 155

    Google Scholar 

  38. Carol Green Wilson, Gump’s Treasure Trade: A Story of San Francisco (New York: Thomas Y. Crowell, 1965 [1949])

    Google Scholar 

  39. Janet Lynn Roseman et al., Gump’s since 1861: A San Francisco Legend (San Francisco: Chronicle Books, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  40. On the phenomenon of studio as showrooms, see Kenneth John Myers, “The Public Display of Art in New York City, 1664–1914,” in Rave Reviews: American Art and Its Critics David B. Dearinger (Hanover, NH: University Press of New England, 2000) 40

    Google Scholar 

  41. Annette Blaugrund, The Tenth Street Studio Building: Artist-Entrepreneurs from the Hudson River School to the American Impressionists (Southampton, NY: Parrish Art Museum, 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Linda Henefield Skalet, “The Market for American Painting in New York, 1870–1915” (Ph.D. diss., Johns Hopkins University, 1980) 11–22.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Malcolm Goldstein, Landscape with Figures: A History of Art Dealing in the United States (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000) 29.

    Google Scholar 

  44. On Europe, see Dianne Sachko Macleod, Art and the Middle Class: Money and the Making of Cultural Identity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996) esp. 38–40, 241–43

    Google Scholar 

  45. Cynthia A. White and Harrison C. White, Canvases and Careers: Institutional Changes in the French Painting World (New York: Wiley, 1965)..

    Google Scholar 

  46. The quotes come from “Judge Crocker’s Fine Art Gallery,” Sacramento Bee December 27, 1873, 3. See also “Art Items,” San Francisco Bulletin September 18, 1871, 3

    Google Scholar 

  47. “Judge Crocker’s Art Gallery on Exhibition,” Sacramento Union, March 18, 1874, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  48. W. K. Vickery, Catalogue of Paintings Exhibited for the Benefit of the Maria Kip Orphanage (San Francisco, 1891)

    Google Scholar 

  49. The still-essential guide to Ruskin’s stateside reception is Roger B. Stein, John Ruskin and Aesthetic Thought in America, 1840–1900 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1967).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  50. Mary Ann Stankiewicz, “‘The Eye Is a Nobler Organ’: Ruskin and American Art Education,” Journal of Aesthetic Education 18, 2 (1984) 51–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Charles Colbert, “A Critical Medium: James Jackson Jarves’s Vision of Art History,” American Art 16, 1 (2002) 18–35. The quotations appear in James Jackson Jarves, “On the Formation of Galleries in America,” Atlantic Monthly 6 (July 1860) 108

    Google Scholar 

  52. Jarves, Art Studies: The “Old Masters” of Italy (New York: Derby and Jackson, 1861) 13.

    Google Scholar 

  53. James Jackson Jarves, Art Thoughts (New York: Hurd & Houghton, 1869) 315

    Google Scholar 

  54. James Jackson Jarves, “Art and Artists of America,” Christian Examiner 75 (1863) 114–27.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Gunther Barth, “Metropolitanism and Urban Elites in the Far West,” in The Age of Industrialism in America: Essays in Social Structures and Cultural Values, ed. Frederic Cople Jaher (New York: Free Press, 1968) 158–87

    Google Scholar 

  56. Patricia Lawrence, “Four Mansions on Nob Hill in the 1870s” (M.A. thesis, University of California, Davis, 1976)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Olive Palmer, comp., Vignettes of Early San Francisco Homes and Gardens (San Francisco: Garden Club, 1935)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Carol M. Osborne, Museum Builders in the West: The Stanfords as Collectors and Patrons of Art, 1870–1906 (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1986) 27–29.

    Google Scholar 

  59. On the Stanfords, see Bertha Berner, Mrs. Leland Stanford: An Intimate Account (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1935) 19–20

    Google Scholar 

  60. Donald Clyde Ball, “A History of the E. B. Crocker Art Gallery and Its Founders” (M.A. thesis, College of the Pacific, 1955)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Richard V. West, “The Crockers and Their Collection: A Brief History,” in Crocker Art Museum: Handbook of Paintings, ed. Richard Vincent West (Sacramento: The Museum, 1979) 7–11

    Google Scholar 

  62. Numerous New York galleries appear in Arnold Lewis, James Turner, and Steven McQuillin, The Opulent Interiors of the Gilded Age (New York: Dover Publications, 1987) passim.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Alexander Saxton, The Indispensable Enemy: Labor and the Anti-Chinese Movement in California (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1971) 114–15

    Google Scholar 

  64. Kevin Starr, Endangered Dreams: The Great Depression in California (New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996) 7–9.

    Google Scholar 

  65. William Deverell, Railroad Crossing: Californians and the Railroad, 1850–1910 (Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press, 1994) 44–45

    Google Scholar 

  66. Ambrose Bierce, “Editorial,” San Francisco Illustrated Wasp May 31, 1884, 4

    Google Scholar 

  67. Bierce, “Editorial,” San Francisco Illustrated Wasp August 5, 1882, 2. On Bierce’s Wasp, see Deverell, Railroad Crossing, 58–59

    Google Scholar 

  68. Ernest Jerome Hopkins, The Ambrose Bierce Satanic Reader (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1968) 194–209

    Google Scholar 

  69. Kenneth M. Johnson, The Sting of the Wasp (San Francisco: Book Club of California, 1967); 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  70. Daniel Lindley, Ambrose Bierce Takes on the Railroad: The Journalist as Muckraker and Cynic (Westport, CT: Praeger, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Paul DiMaggio, “Cultural Entrepreneurship in Nineteenth-Century Boston, Part II: The Classification and Framing of American Art,” Media, Culture & Society 4 (1982) 303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Hubert Howe Bancroft, “Biography of Leland Stanford,” unpublished proofs (ca. 1888) 153.

    Google Scholar 

  73. My language here comes from Benedict Anderson, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (London and New York: Verso, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  74. “Amusements, Etc.,” Alta California October 31, 1868. On the San Francisco Mercantile Library, see Joyce Backus, “A History of the San Francisco Mercantile Library Association” (M.A. thesis, University of California, Berkeley, 1931)

    Google Scholar 

  75. Bradford Luckingham, “Libraries and Museums in Emergent San Francisco: A Note on the Pursuit of Culture in the Urban Far West,” Pacific Historian 17, 3 (1973) 4–11.

    Google Scholar 

  76. On the SFAA at the Mercantile Library, see “The San Francisco Art Association,” Alta California March 29, 1871, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  77. B. P. Avery, “Art in California,” The Aldine 7, 4 (1874) 72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Avery, “Etc.,” Overland Monthly 9, 2 (1872) 91.

    Google Scholar 

  79. G. William Domhoff, The Bohemian Grove and Other Retreats: A Study in Ruling Class Cohesiveness (New York: Harper and Row, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Vasquez, Inventing the Art Collection 7, has noted similar trends in Europe during the period of 1839–1860.

    Google Scholar 

  81. One such local example may be found in T. A. Barry, “Art in California,” California Spirit of the Times July 1, 1876, 14.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Emile Alix Durand-Gréville, “Private Picture Galleries of the United States,” Gazette des Beaux-Arts 36 (1887) 65–75

    Google Scholar 

  83. Earl Shinn [Edward Strahan], The Art Treasures of America (Philadelphia: G. Barrie, 1879–82). See also Emile Alix Durand-Gréville, “Private Picture Galleries of the United States,” Gazette des Beaux-Arts 36 (1887) 65–75

    Google Scholar 

  84. Walter Montgomery, American Art and American Art Collections (Boston: E. W. Walker, 1889).

    Google Scholar 

  85. Dozens of articles on elites’ personal galleries can also be found in the wave of new journals from the period, including Art Amateur, Art Journal, The Collector and The Studio; see also Ruth Krueger Meyer and Madeleine Fidell Beaufort, “The Rage for Collecting: Beyond Pittsburgh in the Gilded Age,” in Gabriel P. Weisberg et al., Collecting in the Gilded Age: Art Patronage in Pittsburgh, 1890–1910 (Pittsburgh: Frick Art and Historical Center, 1997) 315–16.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Charles R. Henschel, “A Personal History of Knoedler,” in The Rise of the Art World in America: Knoedler at 150 (New York: Knoedler, 1996) 10–11

    Google Scholar 

  87. S. R. Koehler, United States’ Art Directory and Year-Book (New York and London: Garland, 1976 [1882–84]), iii.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Carol Troyen, “Innocents Abroad: American Painters at the 1867 Exposition Universelle, Paris,” American Art Journal 16, 4 (1984) 19–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. H. Barbara Weinberg, “Cosmopolitan Attitudes: The Coming of Age of American Art,” in Paris 1889: American Artists at the Universal Exposition ed. Annette Blaugrund (Philadelphia: Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts and New York: Harry N. Abrams, 1989) 33–34.

    Google Scholar 

  90. On the tariff issue, see William J. Barber, “International Commerce in the Fine Arts and American Political Economy, 1789–1913,” in Economic Engagements with Art ed. Neil De Marchi and Craufurd D. W. Goodwin (Durham, NC, and London: Duke University Press, 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  91. Kimberly Orcutt, “Buy American? The Debate over the Art Tariff,” American Art 16, 3 (2002) 82–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Alfred D. Chandler Jr., The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1977)

    Google Scholar 

  93. Chandler, Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990) esp. 51–94

    Google Scholar 

  94. Peter Dobkin Hall, The Organization of American Culture: Private Institutions, Elites, and the Origins of American Nationality, 1700–1900 (New York: New York University Press, 1984)

    Google Scholar 

  95. William G. Roy, Socializing Capital: The Rise of the Large Industrial Corporation in America (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997) 100–10, 122–43

    Google Scholar 

  96. Sven Beckert, The Monied Metropolis: New York City and the Consolidation of the American Bourgeoisie, 1850–1896 (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001) 239–42, 253–65.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  97. In like fashion, Lawrence Levine figures high culture as a “cloak.” Pierre Bourdieu has alternatively categorized the arts as symptomatic of the bourgeois “withdrawal from economic necessity” and their “denial of the social world.” Lawrence W. Levine, Highbrow/Lowbrow: The Emergence of Cultural Hierarchy in America (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988)

    Google Scholar 

  98. Pierre Bourdieu, Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste trans. Richard Nice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1984) 53–54, 596.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Paul Venable Turner, “The Architectural Significance of the Stanford Museum,” in Osborne, Museum Builders 93–97. Cesnola consoled the Stanfords for the loss of their 15-year-old son Leland Jr., lamenting that the young man’s loss was all the greater since he had shown an early interest in antiquities and “the art-training of our American people” (quoted in Osborne, 15). On Cesnola, see also Calvin Tompkins, Merchants and Masterpieces: The Story of the Metropolitan Museum of Art (New York: E. P. Dutton, 1970) esp. 49–83.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Rachel N. Klein, “Art and Authority in Antebellum New York City: The Rise and Fall of the American Art Union,” Journal of American History 81, 4 (1895) 1560. On Boston, see Story, Forging of an Aristocracy 16–17

    Google Scholar 

  101. Neil Harris, “The Gilded Age Revisited: Boston and the Museum Movement,” American Quarterly 14 (1962) 545–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Julia Rosenbaum, “Displaying Civic Culture: The Controversy over Frederick MacMonnies’ Bacchante,” American Art 14, 3 (Fall 2000) 41–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Helen Lefkowitz Horowitz, Culture and the City: Cultural Philanthropy in Chicago from the 1880s to 1917 (Lexington: University of Kentucky Press, 1976) 65

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2010 Sven Beckert and Julia B. Rosenbaum

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ott, J. (2010). The Manufactured Patron: Staging Bourgeois Identity through Art Consumption in Postbellum America. In: The American Bourgeoisie: Distinction and Identity in the Nineteenth Century. Palgrave Studies in Cultural and Intellectual History. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230115569_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230115569_16

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-28751-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-230-11556-9

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics