Skip to main content

Rapprochement in Postwar History: Implications for North Korea

  • Chapter
New Challenges of North Korean Foreign Policy

Abstract

By the end of 2009, Obama had fulfilled his pledges by reaching out to Iran, Cuba, Burma, and, like his predecessor, Libya; it may well be that this “engagement” train is leaving the station, and leaving North Korea behind. But that cannot be known at this writing, and so I want to focus on several cases of engagement and rapprochement with former enemies, in hopes of shedding light on Obama’s policies toward North Korea and Iran—two countries that we specialists keep separate, but that interact daily in the minds of policy-makers—and to critique the long-term American strategy of blockade and isolation toward regimes that Washington does not like.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. James Der Derian, On Diplomacy: A Genealogy of Western Estrangement (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nazila Fathi and Alan Cowell, “After Obama Overture, Iran’s Leader Seeks U.S. Apology,” New York Times, January 29, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Many would see Iran as an exception, but I agree with Max Rodenbeck that it is really “a strategic featherweight.” In a conventional war, a rather long list of countries would be able to devastate it, beginning with Israel, India, and Pakistan. See Rodenbeck, “The Iran Mystery Case,” New York Review of Books, January 15, 2009, 35–38. This article also lists a number of excellent new books on Iran.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See Michael R. Gordon’s investigative report, “How Politics Sank Accord on Missiles with North Korea,” New York Times, March 6, 2001, A-1 and A-8.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Naewoe Press, North Korea: Uneasy, Shaky Kim Jong-il Regime (Seoul: ROK Government, 1997), 143.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bruce B. Auster and Kevin Whitelaw, “Upping the Ante for Kim Jong Il: Pentagon Plan 5030, A New Blueprint for Facing Down North Korea,” U.S. News and World Report, July 21, 2003. http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/030721/21korea.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See a particularly good column on this by Roger Cohen, “The Other Tehran,” New York Times, February 2, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Juan Cole, Engaging the Muslim World (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009), 5, 231, 244.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Kyung-Ae Park

Copyright information

© 2010 Kyung-Ae Park

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cumings, B. (2010). Rapprochement in Postwar History: Implications for North Korea. In: Park, KA. (eds) New Challenges of North Korean Foreign Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230113978_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics