Advertisement

The Neoconservative-Led Network

Chapter
  • 123 Downloads

Abstract

In the aftermath of 9/11, three caricatures of the neoconservativeled network were presented. The first—put forward partly by defensive conservatives and neoconservatives and partly by uninformed critics— depicted the neoconservatives as a “cabal,” implying that they had plotted the Bush foreign policy surreptitiously and were the hidden hand behind the “war on terror.” For some, the fact that neoconservatism as a political phenomenon had received comparatively little media attention in the nineties meant that it seemed like it had come from nowhere when the spotlight shone on the neocons after 9/11. For others, invoking the “cabal” caricature facilitated the deflection of criticism. Joshua Muravchik, David Brooks, a neoconservative New York Time. columnist, and Max Boot, a neoconservative Wall Street Journal editor, all claimed that their critics were reliant on depicting them as a “cabal” or “conspiracy,” with Brooks even claiming they were motivated by anti-Semitism; claims that they then proceeded to refute with ease. However, these loaded terms were not the words of critics but the neocons’ own words. There were no specific examples cited and rarely any names mentioned. Brooks was even forced to retract his allegations of anti-Semitism and issue an apology.1

Keywords

Foreign Policy Wall Street Journal Republican Party Heritage Foundation Midterm Election 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Jacob Heilbrun, “The Neoconservative Journey,” in Peter Berkowitz (ed.), Varieties of Conservatism in Americ. (Hoover Institution Press, Stanford, CA, 2004): 105, 107, 108.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    Shadia B. Drury, The Political Ideas of Leo Straus. (Palgrave Macmillan, New York/Basingstoke, 2005): ix-lix.Google Scholar
  3. 6.
    See Richard King, “Intellectuals and the State: The Case of the Straussians,” Comparative American Studies. Vol. 4, No. 4, December 2006: 395–408;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Norton, Leo Strauss and the Politics of American Empire. 5–20 and 181–200; Stephen Lenzner and William Kristol, “What Was Leo Strauss Up To?” The Public Interes., No. 153, Fall 2003: 19–39;Google Scholar
  5. Gary J. Schmitt and Abram N. Shulsky, “Leo Strauss and the World of Intelligence (By Which We Do Not Mean Nous),” in Kenneth L. Murley and John A. Deutsch (eds.), Leo Strauss, the Straussians and the American Regim. (Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Lanham, MD, 1999): 407–12.Google Scholar
  6. 7.
    Quoted in Jon Meacham, “The GOP’s Master Strategist—William Kristol,” Washington Monthly. September 1994, Vol. 26, No. 9: 32–39.Google Scholar
  7. 39.
    Maria Ryan, “Neoconservatism and the American Public: Was 9/11 a ‘Hegemonic Moment’?” in Helen Laville and Andrew Johnstone (eds.), The U.S. Public and American Foreign Polic. (Routledge, London, 2010).Google Scholar
  8. 40.
    Quoted in John J. Miller, A Gift of Freedom: How the Olin Foundation Changed Americ. (Encounter Books, San Francisco, 2006): 4, 56–57.Google Scholar
  9. 54.
    David Brock, Blinded by the Right: The Conscience of an Ex-Conservativ. (Three Rivers Press, New York, 2002): 87.Google Scholar
  10. 56.
    On the practical importance of institutional recuperation of intellectuals, see Hugh Wilford, The New York Intellectuals: From Vanguard to Institutio. (Manchester University Press, Manchester, 1995): Introduction and Epilogue.Google Scholar
  11. 57.
    In addition to the books already cited, see Muravchik, The Imperative of American Leadership. Michael Ledeen, Freedom Betrayed: How America Led a Global Democratic Revolution, Won the Cold War and Walked Awa. (AEI Press, Washington, D.C., 1996).Google Scholar
  12. 58.
    Stefan Halper and Jonathon Clarke, America Alone: The Neo-Conservatives and the Global Orde. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2004): 118–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 61.
    William Kristol, “A Conservative Looks at Liberalism,” Commentar., Vol. 96, No. 3, September 1993: 33–36.Google Scholar
  14. David Frum, The Right Man: An Inside Account of the Surprise Presidency of George W. Bus. (Weidenfeld&Nicolson, London, 2003): 224–45.Google Scholar
  15. 76.
    Ivo H. Daalder, Getting to Dayton: The Making of America’s Bosnia Polic. (Brookings Institution Press, Washington, D.C., 2000): 81–162.Google Scholar
  16. 91.
    Krauthammer, “Democratic Realism” Lecture. See also Charles Krauthammer, “The Neoconservative Convergence,” Commentary. July–August 2005, Vol. 20, No. 1: 21–26.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Maria Ryan 2010

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations