Abstract
One of the recently emerged approaches in the humanities and social sciences that attempts to act in the role of a connector between various experiences of otherness, determined by the imperial-colonial dimension of modernity, is the decolonial turn or decolonial option. There are several points formulated by decolonial humanists which I attempt to dialogue with here. First of all, it is a fundamental rethinking of modernity from its underside (Dussel 1996). According to Enrique Dussel, modernity as a European phenomenon is “constituted in a dialectical relation with a non-European alterity that is its ultimate content. Modernity appears when Europe affirms itself as the ‘center’ of a World History that it inaugurates: the ‘periphery’ that surrounds this center is consequently part of its self-definition … (Dussel 1995, 65) Modernity includes a rational ‘concept’ of emancipation that we affirm and subsume. But, at the same time, it develops an irrational myth, a justification for genocidal violence. The postmodernists criticize modern reason as a reason of terror; we criticize modern reason because of the irrational myth that it conceals” (Mignolo 2007, 454).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 2010 Madina Tlostanova
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tlostanova, M. (2010). Decolonial Feminism and the Decolonial Turn. In: Gender Epistemologies and Eurasian Borderlands. Comparative Feminist Studies Series. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230113923_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230113923_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-29122-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-11392-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)